sup

A curses threads-with-tags style email client

sup-website.git

git clone https://supmua.dev/git/sup-website/

community/pipermail-archives/sup-talk/2011-01.txt (90274B) - raw

      1 From vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu  Sun Jan  2 08:28:32 2011
      2 From: vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu (Matthias Vallentin)
      3 Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 05:28:32 -0800
      4 Subject: [sup-talk] Standard message operations
      5 Message-ID: <1293974819-sup-7114@samurai.icir.org>
      6 
      7 How do I move a message to the inbox? When I try to add the label
      8 inbox, sup complains: 'inbox' is a reserved label! 
      9 
     10 Also, how do I mark messages as read other than reading it in a buffer?
     11 
     12     Matthias
     13 
     14 From kljohann@gmail.com  Sun Jan  2 09:38:12 2011
     15 From: kljohann@gmail.com (=?utf-8?q?Johann_Kl=C3=A4hn?=)
     16 Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 15:38:12 +0100
     17 Subject: [sup-talk] Standard message operations
     18 In-Reply-To: <1293974819-sup-7114@samurai.icir.org>
     19 References: <1293974819-sup-7114@samurai.icir.org>
     20 Message-ID: <1293978932-sup-1127@ahoi>
     21 
     22 Hi Matthias, pressing '?' at any time provides you with all key
     23 bindings available.
     24 
     25 > How do I move a message to the inbox? When I try to add the label
     26 > inbox, sup complains: 'inbox' is a reserved label! 
     27 I usually do this by pressing 'a' (the same key binding is used for
     28 archiving messages)
     29 
     30 > Also, how do I mark messages as read other than reading it in a buffer?
     31 Try 'N'
     32 
     33 Johann
     34 
     35 From bwalton@artsci.utoronto.ca  Sun Jan  2 09:39:09 2011
     36 From: bwalton@artsci.utoronto.ca (Ben Walton)
     37 Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 09:39:09 -0500
     38 Subject: [sup-talk] Standard message operations
     39 In-Reply-To: <1293974819-sup-7114@samurai.icir.org>
     40 References: <1293974819-sup-7114@samurai.icir.org>
     41 Message-ID: <1293979127-sup-9066@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
     42 
     43 Excerpts from Matthias Vallentin's message of Sun Jan 02 08:28:32 -0500 2011:
     44 
     45 > How do I move a message to the inbox? When I try to add the label
     46 > inbox, sup complains: 'inbox' is a reserved label! 
     47 
     48 The 'archive' toggle controls the inbox label.  Use 'a' on a message
     49 in the inbox to archive it.  Use 'A' on a message in the inbox to mark
     50 it read and archive it.
     51 
     52 > Also, how do I mark messages as read other than reading it in a
     53 > buffer?
     54 
     55 Use the 'n' key to do this.
     56 
     57 Use the '?' key on any sup view to see the available key strokes and
     58 their descriptions.
     59 
     60 HTH.
     61 -Ben
     62 --
     63 Ben Walton
     64 Systems Programmer - CHASS
     65 University of Toronto
     66 C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302
     67 
     68 
     69 From moritz+sup@wzff.de  Sun Jan  2 10:47:03 2011
     70 From: moritz+sup@wzff.de (Moritz Wilhelmy)
     71 Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 16:47:03 +0100
     72 Subject: [sup-talk] Standard message operations
     73 In-Reply-To: <1293979127-sup-9066@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
     74 References: <1293974819-sup-7114@samurai.icir.org>
     75 	<1293979127-sup-9066@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
     76 Message-ID: <1293982844-sup-20@niflheimr>
     77 
     78 Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Sun Jan 02 15:39:09 +0100 2011:
     79 > Excerpts from Matthias Vallentin's message of Sun Jan 02 08:28:32 -0500 2011:
     80 > 
     81 > > How do I move a message to the inbox? When I try to add the label
     82 > > inbox, sup complains: 'inbox' is a reserved label! 
     83 > 
     84 > The 'archive' toggle controls the inbox label.  Use 'a' on a message
     85 > in the inbox to archive it.  Use 'A' on a message in the inbox to mark
     86 > it read and archive it.
     87 
     88 Which raises the question: why are there some special labels reserved by sup?
     89 I don't see any disadvantages by making labels such as sent or inbox applicable
     90 to messages by normal means.  In fact, I think the the current behaviour is
     91 rather inconvenient.  Can anyone enlighten me?
     92 
     93 Best regards,
     94 
     95 Moritz
     96 
     97 From vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu  Sun Jan  2 11:13:39 2011
     98 From: vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu (Matthias Vallentin)
     99 Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 08:13:39 -0800
    100 Subject: [sup-talk] message.list_address weirdness
    101 In-Reply-To: <20101227100718.GL60419@icsi.berkeley.edu>
    102 References: <20101227100718.GL60419@icsi.berkeley.edu>
    103 Message-ID: <1293984326-sup-8884@samurai.icir.org>
    104 
    105 On Dec 27 2010 at 02:07AM PST, Matthias Vallentin wrote:
    106 > I cannot get message.list_address to match to add labels before adding
    107 > messages although the messages definitively have the List-Post header.
    108 
    109 Actually, the proposed changes will cause a crash when replying to a
    110 list address (i.e., hitting 'G'), which expects message.list_address to
    111 return a Person object rather than a string containing the email
    112 address. This is inconsistent with the wiki [1] and started my confusion
    113 in the first place. Automatically adding labels for mailing lists would
    114 then change from
    115 
    116     if message.list_address =~ /sup-talk/
    117       message.add_label "sup"
    118       message.add_label "list"
    119     end
    120 
    121 to
    122 
    123     if message.list_address and message.list_address.email =~ /sup-talk/
    124       message.add_label "sup"
    125       message.add_label "list"
    126     end
    127 
    128 in order to work correctly. In [1], list_address is documented to be of
    129 type String, which should probably be changed to type Person. I find the
    130 naming (list_address) slightly misleading because it suggest a plain
    131 email address. What about introducing a new member message.list that
    132 returns a Person object and making
    133 message.list_{address,subscribe,unsubscribe} return a string?
    134 
    135     Matthias
    136 
    137 [1] http://sup.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?AutoAddLabelsToNewMessages
    138 
    139 From vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu  Mon Jan  3 05:24:12 2011
    140 From: vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu (Matthias Vallentin)
    141 Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 02:24:12 -0800
    142 Subject: [sup-talk] Standard message operations
    143 In-Reply-To: <1293978932-sup-1127@ahoi>
    144 References: <1293974819-sup-7114@samurai.icir.org> <1293978932-sup-1127@ahoi>
    145 Message-ID: <1294050106-sup-9643@samurai.icir.org>
    146 
    147 On Jan 02 2011 at 06:38AM PST, Johann Kl?hn wrote:
    148 > Hi Matthias, pressing '?' at any time provides you with all key
    149 > bindings available.
    150 
    151 My main problem was getting used to the concept of toggling, i.e., using
    152 the same key for different operations. Now I wonder how I missed them in
    153 the first place!
    154 
    155     Matthias
    156 
    157 From vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu  Mon Jan  3 05:33:23 2011
    158 From: vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu (Matthias Vallentin)
    159 Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 02:33:23 -0800
    160 Subject: [sup-talk] Standard message operations
    161 In-Reply-To: <1293982844-sup-20@niflheimr>
    162 References: <1293974819-sup-7114@samurai.icir.org>
    163 	<1293979127-sup-9066@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
    164 	<1293982844-sup-20@niflheimr>
    165 Message-ID: <1294050366-sup-1412@samurai.icir.org>
    166 
    167 On Jan 02 2011 at 07:47AM PST, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
    168 > Which raises the question: why are there some special labels reserved by sup?
    169 > I don't see any disadvantages by making labels such as sent or inbox applicable
    170 > to messages by normal means.  In fact, I think the the current behaviour is
    171 > rather inconvenient.
    172 
    173 I agree that it is sometimes desirable to use reserved labels. For
    174 example, while I was loading my 100k+ messages into sup, I found some
    175 messages of mine that slipped through the automatic labelling as sent
    176 during the import, but I would still like to label them as such now.
    177 
    178     Matthias
    179 
    180 From vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu  Mon Jan  3 07:09:10 2011
    181 From: vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu (Matthias Vallentin)
    182 Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 04:09:10 -0800
    183 Subject: [sup-talk] Tilde expansion in signature path
    184 Message-ID: <1294053615-sup-2448@samurai.icir.org>
    185 
    186 Is there a specific reason why a tilde in the :signature: path is not
    187 expanded? If not, this patch will enable it:
    188 
    189 diff --git a/lib/sup/account.rb b/lib/sup/account.rb
    190 index 1718d94..6e078cf 100644
    191 --- a/lib/sup/account.rb
    192 +++ b/lib/sup/account.rb
    193 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ class Account < Person
    194      raise ArgumentError, "no email for account" unless h[:email]
    195      super h[:name], h[:email]
    196      @sendmail = h[:sendmail]
    197 -    @signature = h[:signature]
    198 +    @signature = File.expand_path h[:signature]
    199      @gpgkey = h[:gpgkey]
    200    end
    201 
    202     Matthias
    203 
    204 From vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu  Mon Jan  3 14:34:00 2011
    205 From: vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu (Matthias Vallentin)
    206 Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:34:00 -0800
    207 Subject: [sup-talk] Multiple execution of before-edit hook
    208 Message-ID: <1294082627-sup-4287@samurai.icir.org>
    209 
    210 I noticed that before-edit is executed several times when replying:
    211 
    212     @headers.each do |k, v|
    213       @bodies[k] = body
    214       HookManager.run "before-edit", :header => v, :body => @bodies[k]
    215     end
    216 
    217 What's the rational behind this? Why not invoking the hook once, for all
    218 headers and the body. (Also, the hook is executed again in the parent
    219 class EditMessageMode.) Since I use the hook to append some text at the
    220 end of the body
    221 
    222     body << "foo"
    223 
    224 the text is added multiple times. Currently I use a crude hack to avoid
    225 the duplicate appending by
    226 
    227     body << "foo" unless body.last == "foo"
    228 
    229 but I wonder whether this behavior is intentional.
    230 
    231     Matthias
    232 
    233 From vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu  Mon Jan  3 15:15:46 2011
    234 From: vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu (Matthias Vallentin)
    235 Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:15:46 -0800
    236 Subject: [sup-talk] Tilde expansion in signature path
    237 In-Reply-To: <1294053615-sup-2448@samurai.icir.org>
    238 References: <1294053615-sup-2448@samurai.icir.org>
    239 Message-ID: <1294085707-sup-6047@samurai.icir.org>
    240 
    241 Better: this tweak supports account configurations with lacking
    242 :signature: fields.
    243 
    244 +    @signature = File.expand_path h[:signature] if h[:signature]
    245 
    246     Matthias
    247 
    248 From tero@tilus.net  Mon Jan  3 15:46:59 2011
    249 From: tero@tilus.net (Tero Tilus)
    250 Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 22:46:59 +0200
    251 Subject: [sup-talk] Hook before-add-message,
    252 	any way to know if this message is in a topic I replied to ?
    253 In-Reply-To: <1293105681-sup-7985@Phoenix>
    254 References: <1292845256-sup-6025@Phoenix> <1292846110-sup-9522@tilus.net>
    255 	<1293105681-sup-7985@Phoenix>
    256 Message-ID: <1294086796-sup-9450@tilus.net>
    257 
    258 Wael Nasreddine, 2010-12-23 14:04:
    259 > I added this method to my before-add-message hook and I call it at the
    260 > very end of the before-add-hook (so it's executed at the end)
    261 > 
    262 > ------- CUT
    263 > def show_if_participated(message)
    264 >   return if message.has_label? :inbox
    265 > 
    266 >   my_emails = ['wael.nasreddine at gmail.com', 'anotheremail at example.com']
    267 >   ts = ThreadSet.new Index.instance, $config[:thread_by_subject]
    268 >   ts.load_thread_for_message message
    269 >   message_thread = ts.thread_for message
    270 >   return unless message_thread
    271 >   message.add_label :inbox if my_emails.any? { |email|
    272 > message_thread.authors.include? email }
    273 > end
    274 > ------- CUT
    275 > 
    276 > However it's not working, I remove ~/.sup/xapian and ran sup-sync,
    277 > this email does not have the inbox label however it's one of the
    278 > thread that I replied to in a mailing list, what's wrong with my
    279 > function?
    280 
    281 On the surface it looks like it should work.  Couple of questions
    282 raise when I look at the code.  Does the thread loading actually work
    283 like that?  I might have been awfully wrong.  Does #authors return
    284 email addresses or Person instances?  Did your reply come from one of
    285 the addresses listed in my_emails?  Did you reply only once and was
    286 that message the last one of it's thread to be indexed?  Your first
    287 mail to particular thread obviously won't trigger
    288 show_if_participated(), but subsequent mails will.
    289 
    290 Does your hook look like this?  (Judging by your explanation, it most
    291 probably does)
    292 
    293   ...
    294   def show_if_participated(message)
    295   end
    296   ...
    297   show_if_participated(message)
    298   ...
    299 
    300 -- 
    301 Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/
    302 
    303 From wael.nasreddine@gmail.com  Mon Jan  3 16:02:06 2011
    304 From: wael.nasreddine@gmail.com (Wael Nasreddine)
    305 Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 22:02:06 +0100
    306 Subject: [sup-talk] Hook before-add-message,
    307 	any way to know if this message is in a topic I replied to ?
    308 In-Reply-To: <1294086796-sup-9450@tilus.net>
    309 References: <1292845256-sup-6025@Phoenix> <1292846110-sup-9522@tilus.net>
    310 	<1293105681-sup-7985@Phoenix> <1294086796-sup-9450@tilus.net>
    311 Message-ID: <1294088289-sup-6218@Phoenix>
    312 
    313 This one time, at SUP Camp, Tero Tilus said, On 2011-01-03 21:46:
    314 > Wael Nasreddine, 2010-12-23 14:04:
    315 > > I added this method to my before-add-message hook and I call it at the
    316 > > very end of the before-add-hook (so it's executed at the end)
    317 
    318 > > ------- CUT
    319 > > def show_if_participated(message)
    320 > >   return if message.has_label? :inbox
    321 
    322 > >   my_emails = ['wael.nasreddine at gmail.com', 'anotheremail at example.com']
    323 > >   ts = ThreadSet.new Index.instance, $config[:thread_by_subject]
    324 > >   ts.load_thread_for_message message
    325 > >   message_thread = ts.thread_for message
    326 > >   return unless message_thread
    327 > >   message.add_label :inbox if my_emails.any? { |email|
    328 > > message_thread.authors.include? email }
    329 > > end
    330 > > ------- CUT
    331 
    332 > > However it's not working, I remove ~/.sup/xapian and ran sup-sync,
    333 > > this email does not have the inbox label however it's one of the
    334 > > thread that I replied to in a mailing list, what's wrong with my
    335 > > function?
    336 
    337 > On the surface it looks like it should work.  Couple of questions
    338 > raise when I look at the code.  Does the thread loading actually work
    339 > like that?  I might have been awfully wrong.  Does #authors return
    340 > email addresses or Person instances?
    341 I'm not sure, someone else might know about this.
    342 
    343 
    344 > Did your reply come from one of
    345 > the addresses listed in my_emails?
    346 Of course, I made sure all my aliases are listed in this Array (BTW
    347 any way to get all the addresses listed in the config file into this
    348 array?)
    349 
    350 > Did you reply only once and was
    351 > that message the last one of it's thread to be indexed?  Your first
    352 > mail to particular thread obviously won't trigger
    353 > show_if_participated(), but subsequent mails will.
    354 
    355 Well This email ended up in the list_sup_talk and out of the inbox,
    356 even though I did reply couple of times to it
    357 
    358 > Does your hook look like this?  (Judging by your explanation, it most
    359 > probably does)
    360 
    361 Yes exactly like this, I'll attach the before-add-hook in another
    362 personal email to you since it has many addresses to people I know
    363 won't like to be spammed (@list: sorry)
    364 
    365 >   ...
    366 >   def show_if_participated(message)
    367 >   end
    368 >   ...
    369 >   show_if_participated(message)
    370 >   ...
    371 
    372 -- 
    373 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    374           Wa?l Nasreddine
    375 website    http://wael.nasreddine.com
    376 Blog       http://emxyptlk.com
    377 TechnoGate http://technogate.fr
    378 mobile     06.32.94.70.13
    379 landline   09.70.444.236
    380 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    381 
    382 From vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu  Tue Jan  4 11:54:36 2011
    383 From: vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu (Matthias Vallentin)
    384 Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 08:54:36 -0800
    385 Subject: [sup-talk] Exporting search query result to a Maildir directory
    386 Message-ID: <1294159745-sup-4314@samurai.icir.org>
    387 
    388 I would like to export the result of a search query to a Maildir
    389 directory. Is that possible? I feel that it starts like this
    390 
    391     Index.each_message(Index.parse_query("select recent mail")) ...
    392 
    393 but don't know the machinery works that does the Maildir export. Because
    394 the result can span multiple sources the trivial solution, i.e.,  to
    395 access the raw Maildir source, is not an option.
    396 
    397     Matthias
    398 
    399 From rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu  Sat Jan 15 02:07:28 2011
    400 From: rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu (Rich Lane)
    401 Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 02:07:28 -0500
    402 Subject: [sup-talk] Sup 0.12 released
    403 Message-ID: <1295068347-sup-3453@zyrg.net>
    404 
    405 I'm pleased to announce the release of Sup 0.12.
    406 
    407 Sup is a console-based email client for people with a lot of email.
    408 It supports tagging, very fast full-text search, automatic contact-
    409 list management, and more. If you're the type of person who treats
    410 email as an extension of your long-term memory, Sup is for you.
    411 
    412 Get it: gem install sup
    413 Learn it: http://sup.rubyforge.org
    414 Love it: sup-talk at rubyforge.org
    415 
    416 Release notes:
    417 
    418 Deprecated remote sources have been removed.
    419 
    420 Maildir support has been improved to gracefully handle messages that
    421 move or disappear. The "out of sync" errors should no longer occur.
    422 
    423 Inline GPG is now supported.
    424 
    425 Changelog for 0.12:
    426 
    427 * Remove deprecated IMAP, IMAPS, and mbox+ssh sources
    428 * Inline GPG support
    429 * Robust maildir support
    430 * sup-dump compatibility between Sup versions
    431 * New hook: sendmail
    432 * Better Ruby 1.9/UTF8 support
    433 * As always, many bugfixes and tweaks.
    434 
    435 From self@antono.info  Sun Jan 16 21:56:22 2011
    436 From: self@antono.info (Antono Vasiljev)
    437 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 04:56:22 +0200
    438 Subject: [sup-talk] Custom cursor color
    439 Message-ID: <1295232827-sup-7356@ubook.local>
    440 
    441 Hello, All.
    442 
    443 First of all thanks to developers for great MUA!
    444 
    445 I trying to customize colors for sup and cannot find
    446 any yaml key for cursor color (highlighted line moved by J/K).
    447 Anyone can help me?
    448 
    449 -- 
    450 xmpp:self at antono.info
    451 http://antono.info/
    452 gopher://antono.info/
    453 
    454 From shadowfirebird@gmail.com  Mon Jan 17 05:44:42 2011
    455 From: shadowfirebird@gmail.com (Shadowfirebird)
    456 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:44:42 +0000
    457 Subject: [sup-talk] Sup 0.12 released
    458 In-Reply-To: <1295068347-sup-3453@zyrg.net>
    459 References: <1295068347-sup-3453@zyrg.net>
    460 Message-ID: <AANLkTimE-40sx8xXxQbjz=Jok3FnWJZgmNTBiMObRahx@mail.gmail.com>
    461 
    462 That's nice.
    463 
    464 Can I make a  criticism?   Perhaps there should have been a warning that
    465 upgrading is not just a matter of running "gem upgrade sup" because there
    466 are engine changes, with a link to the detailed description on the web of
    467 how to upgrade?
    468 
    469 And perhaps you should put a detailed descrption on the web of how to
    470 upgrade?
    471 
    472 "This Sup version expects a v4 index, but you have an existing v2 index.
    473 Please run sup-dump to save your labels, move /home/fred/.sup/xapian out of
    474 the way, and run sup-sync --restore."
    475 
    476 Perhaps it really is as simple as this, but this is my "live" data we are
    477 talking about here.   A little hand-holding would not have gone amis.
    478 
    479 
    480 On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Rich Lane <rlane at club.cc.cmu.edu> wrote:
    481 
    482 > I'm pleased to announce the release of Sup 0.12.
    483 >
    484 > Sup is a console-based email client for people with a lot of email.
    485 > It supports tagging, very fast full-text search, automatic contact-
    486 > list management, and more. If you're the type of person who treats
    487 > email as an extension of your long-term memory, Sup is for you.
    488 >
    489 > Get it: gem install sup
    490 > Learn it: http://sup.rubyforge.org
    491 > Love it: sup-talk at rubyforge.org
    492 >
    493 > Release notes:
    494 >
    495 > Deprecated remote sources have been removed.
    496 >
    497 > Maildir support has been improved to gracefully handle messages that
    498 > move or disappear. The "out of sync" errors should no longer occur.
    499 >
    500 > Inline GPG is now supported.
    501 >
    502 > Changelog for 0.12:
    503 >
    504 > * Remove deprecated IMAP, IMAPS, and mbox+ssh sources
    505 > * Inline GPG support
    506 > * Robust maildir support
    507 > * sup-dump compatibility between Sup versions
    508 > * New hook: sendmail
    509 > * Better Ruby 1.9/UTF8 support
    510 > * As always, many bugfixes and tweaks.
    511 > _______________________________________________
    512 > sup-talk mailing list
    513 > sup-talk at rubyforge.org
    514 > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
    515 >
    516 
    517 
    518 
    519 -- 
    520 What a tangled web we weave / Go 'round with circumstance / Someone show me
    521 how to tell / The dancer from the dance...
    522 -------------- next part --------------
    523 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    524 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20110117/51fcfcfa/attachment.html>
    525 
    526 From hollunder@lavabit.com  Mon Jan 17 17:03:23 2011
    527 From: hollunder@lavabit.com (=?utf-8?q?Philipp_=C3=9Cberbacher?=)
    528 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:03:23 +0100
    529 Subject: [sup-talk] Sup 0.12 released
    530 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimE-40sx8xXxQbjz=Jok3FnWJZgmNTBiMObRahx@mail.gmail.com>
    531 References: <1295068347-sup-3453@zyrg.net>
    532 	<AANLkTimE-40sx8xXxQbjz=Jok3FnWJZgmNTBiMObRahx@mail.gmail.com>
    533 Message-ID: <1295301694-sup-2240@eris>
    534 
    535 Excerpts from Shadowfirebird's message of 2011-01-17 11:44:42 +0100:
    536 > That's nice.
    537 > 
    538 > Can I make a  criticism?   Perhaps there should have been a warning that
    539 > upgrading is not just a matter of running "gem upgrade sup" because there
    540 > are engine changes, with a link to the detailed description on the web of
    541 > how to upgrade?
    542 > 
    543 > And perhaps you should put a detailed descrption on the web of how to
    544 > upgrade?
    545 > 
    546 > "This Sup version expects a v4 index, but you have an existing v2 index.
    547 > Please run sup-dump to save your labels, move /home/fred/.sup/xapian out of
    548 > the way, and run sup-sync --restore."
    549 > 
    550 > Perhaps it really is as simple as this, but this is my "live" data we are
    551 > talking about here.   A little hand-holding would not have gone amis.
    552 > 
    553 > On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Rich Lane <rlane at club.cc.cmu.edu> wrote:
    554 > 
    555 > > I'm pleased to announce the release of Sup 0.12.
    556 > >
    557 > > Sup is a console-based email client for people with a lot of email.
    558 > > It supports tagging, very fast full-text search, automatic contact-
    559 > > list management, and more. If you're the type of person who treats
    560 > > email as an extension of your long-term memory, Sup is for you.
    561 > >
    562 > > Get it: gem install sup
    563 > > Learn it: http://sup.rubyforge.org
    564 > > Love it: sup-talk at rubyforge.org
    565 > >
    566 > > Release notes:
    567 > >
    568 > > Deprecated remote sources have been removed.
    569 > >
    570 > > Maildir support has been improved to gracefully handle messages that
    571 > > move or disappear. The "out of sync" errors should no longer occur.
    572 > >
    573 > > Inline GPG is now supported.
    574 > >
    575 > > Changelog for 0.12:
    576 > >
    577 > > * Remove deprecated IMAP, IMAPS, and mbox+ssh sources
    578 > > * Inline GPG support
    579 > > * Robust maildir support
    580 > > * sup-dump compatibility between Sup versions
    581 > > * New hook: sendmail
    582 > > * Better Ruby 1.9/UTF8 support
    583 > > * As always, many bugfixes and tweaks.
    584 > > _______________________________________________
    585 > > sup-talk mailing list
    586 > > sup-talk at rubyforge.org
    587 > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
    588 > >
    589 
    590 There also seem to be huge problems building and installing sup 0.12,
    591 have a look here to get an idea how much frustration it already caused:
    592 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26439
    593 
    594 
    595 From rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu  Mon Jan 17 22:36:13 2011
    596 From: rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu (Rich Lane)
    597 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:36:13 -0500
    598 Subject: [sup-talk] Sup 0.12 released
    599 In-Reply-To: <1295301694-sup-2240@eris>
    600 References: <1295068347-sup-3453@zyrg.net>
    601 	<AANLkTimE-40sx8xXxQbjz=Jok3FnWJZgmNTBiMObRahx@mail.gmail.com>
    602 	<1295301694-sup-2240@eris>
    603 Message-ID: <1295321122-sup-9696@zyrg.net>
    604 
    605 Excerpts from Philipp ?berbacher's message of Mon Jan 17 17:03:23 -0500 2011:
    606 > There also seem to be huge problems building and installing sup 0.12,
    607 > have a look here to get an idea how much frustration it already caused:
    608 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26439
    609 
    610 I use Arch myself so I'm surprised there's been so much trouble
    611 packaging for it. Does gettext need to be a gem dependency? I've
    612 reconsidered the ncurses mess and master now requires ncursesw. I'm not
    613 convinced an Arch package should be using xapian-full - I only made that
    614 gem because I wanted the install process to be as simple as "gem install
    615 sup". The normal Arch Xapian package should work fine.
    616 
    617 Besides the ncursesw change is there anything else you want in 0.12.1?
    618 
    619 From sascha-ml-reply-to-2011-1@silbe.org  Tue Jan 18 12:34:54 2011
    620 From: sascha-ml-reply-to-2011-1@silbe.org (Sascha Silbe)
    621 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:34:54 +0100
    622 Subject: [sup-talk] Send Individually feature
    623 In-Reply-To: <1278630818-sup-6829@guava.lanl.gov>
    624 References: <1278630818-sup-6829@guava.lanl.gov>
    625 Message-ID: <1295370861-sup-7366@xo15-sascha.sascha.silbe.org>
    626 
    627 Excerpts from John Bent's message of Fri Jul 09 01:15:50 +0200 2010:
    628 
    629 > I sometimes send email to large recipient lists.  I would really like
    630 > there to be a way to ask sup to send a separate email to each recipient
    631 > instead of just sending the same one to all.
    632 
    633 I've implemented something similar recently, using the new "sendmail"
    634 hook (that I added for exactly that purpose). Maybe you can adjust it to
    635 suit your needs.
    636 
    637 Sascha
    638 
    639 -- 
    640 http://sascha.silbe.org/
    641 http://www.infra-silbe.de/
    642 -------------- next part --------------
    643 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
    644 Name: sendmail.rb
    645 Type: application/x-ruby
    646 Size: 2575 bytes
    647 Desc: not available
    648 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20110118/7d5ab2ed/attachment.bin>
    649 -------------- next part --------------
    650 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
    651 Name: signature.asc
    652 Type: application/pgp-signature
    653 Size: 494 bytes
    654 Desc: not available
    655 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20110118/7d5ab2ed/attachment-0001.bin>
    656 
    657 From mnjagadeesh@gmail.com  Wed Jan 19 00:55:56 2011
    658 From: mnjagadeesh@gmail.com (Jagadeesh N. Malakannavar)
    659 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:25:56 +0530
    660 Subject: [sup-talk] issue after upgrading sup mainline
    661 Message-ID: <AANLkTi=uUvKgVk4AEiiaBSjSL7=+w=HiWSNs5nb2MTdJ@mail.gmail.com>
    662 
    663 Hi,
    664 
    665 I wanted to use 0.12 version of sup and did git pull. But getting below
    666 error.
    667 
    668 jagadeesh at jagadeesh-laptop ~/Downloads/SUP/mainline $ ls
    669 bin           devel        lib          README.txt          sup-version.rb
    670 bugs          doc          LICENSE      ReleaseNotes        test
    671 contrib       HACKING      protocol.md  release-script.txt  www
    672 CONTRIBUTORS  History.txt  Rakefile     sup-files.rb
    673 
    674 jagadeesh at jagadeesh-laptop ~/Downloads/SUP/mainline $ ruby -I lib -w bin/sup
    675 ./lib/sup/util.rb:330: warning: `&' interpreted as argument prefix
    676 /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/pathname.rb:263: warning: `*' interpreted as argument
    677 prefix
    678 ./lib/sup/util.rb:19: warning: method redefined; discarding old gen_lock_id
    679 ./lib/sup/util.rb:30: warning: method redefined; discarding old dump_lock_id
    680 ./lib/sup/util.rb:107: warning: method redefined; discarding old
    681 calculate_boundaries
    682 ./lib/sup/message.rb:285: warning: `&' interpreted as argument prefix
    683 ./lib/sup/index.rb:564: warning: `&' interpreted as argument prefix
    684 ./lib/sup/index.rb:17: Xapian version 1.2.1 or higher required
    685 (RuntimeError)
    686 from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
    687 `gem_original_require'
    688 from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
    689 from ./lib/sup.rb:359
    690 from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
    691 `gem_original_require'
    692 from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
    693 from bin/sup:22
    694 jagadeesh at jagadeesh-laptop ~/Downloads/SUP/mainline $ ruby -v
    695 ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i486-linux]
    696 
    697 Can someone help me fixing this issue?
    698 
    699 Thanks
    700 -------------- next part --------------
    701 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    702 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20110119/165d6c98/attachment-0001.html>
    703 
    704 From edward@tropic.org.uk  Thu Jan 20 12:07:56 2011
    705 From: edward@tropic.org.uk (Edward Speyer)
    706 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:07:56 -0800
    707 Subject: [sup-talk] Screen width
    708 Message-ID: <AANLkTimqCKWS7vAMGAv4bAxuTz5tKdKNBUP3ZdtGGdnB@mail.gmail.com>
    709 
    710 Yo,
    711 
    712 Is there an easy way to get sup to wrap emails at 72 columns, even if my
    713 terminal is much wider than that?
    714 
    715 Right now I'm reading an email with a single quoted-printable text/plain
    716 attachment with lines 283 characters long.
    717 
    718 I'm happy to try patching this myself if someone can get me started,
    719 pointing in the right direction.
    720 
    721 Cheers,
    722 
    723 Ed
    724 -------------- next part --------------
    725 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    726 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20110120/540fe45f/attachment.html>
    727 
    728 From tero@tilus.net  Thu Jan 20 14:23:24 2011
    729 From: tero@tilus.net (Tero Tilus)
    730 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:23:24 +0200
    731 Subject: [sup-talk] Screen width
    732 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimqCKWS7vAMGAv4bAxuTz5tKdKNBUP3ZdtGGdnB@mail.gmail.com>
    733 References: <AANLkTimqCKWS7vAMGAv4bAxuTz5tKdKNBUP3ZdtGGdnB@mail.gmail.com>
    734 Message-ID: <1295551276-sup-5039@tilus.net>
    735 
    736 Edward Speyer, 2011-01-20 19:07:
    737 > Is there an easy way to get sup to wrap emails at 72 columns
    738 
    739 Just tune wrap_width in your ~/.sup/config.yaml.
    740 
    741 -- 
    742 Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/
    743 
    744 From edward@tropic.org.uk  Thu Jan 20 14:33:28 2011
    745 From: edward@tropic.org.uk (Edward Speyer)
    746 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:33:28 -0800
    747 Subject: [sup-talk] Screen width
    748 In-Reply-To: <1295551276-sup-5039@tilus.net>
    749 References: <AANLkTimqCKWS7vAMGAv4bAxuTz5tKdKNBUP3ZdtGGdnB@mail.gmail.com>
    750 	<1295551276-sup-5039@tilus.net>
    751 Message-ID: <AANLkTi=GP38t0guNhsEJ5k0ap4-V5TjHcrnztbMOn6bz@mail.gmail.com>
    752 
    753 Smashing, cheers.
    754 
    755 On 20 January 2011 11:23, Tero Tilus <tero at tilus.net> wrote:
    756 
    757 > Edward Speyer, 2011-01-20 19:07:
    758 > > Is there an easy way to get sup to wrap emails at 72 columns
    759 >
    760 > Just tune wrap_width in your ~/.sup/config.yaml.
    761 >
    762 > --
    763 > Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/
    764 > _______________________________________________
    765 > sup-talk mailing list
    766 > sup-talk at rubyforge.org
    767 > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
    768 >
    769 >
    770 -------------- next part --------------
    771 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    772 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20110120/b3002205/attachment.html>
    773 
    774 From bacuh@riseup.net  Sun Jan 23 03:25:58 2011
    775 From: bacuh@riseup.net (Sebastian Lipp)
    776 Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:25:58 +0100
    777 Subject: [sup-talk] gpg-options.rb: how to set always_trust
    778 Message-ID: <1295770743-sup-9363@fly>
    779 
    780 Hi.
    781 
    782 I've just 'git pull'ed so my always_trust setting for GnuPG isn't
    783 working any more. I tried to set it by just putting
    784   {:always_trust => true}
    785 into gpg-options.rb but it doesn't work. I bet I have to put something
    786 like
    787   if(operation == encrypt)
    788     always_trust = 1;
    789 into the file. The Problem is that I have got no clue about Ruby.
    790 
    791 Any assistance in putting the right code snipped here would be
    792 appreciated.
    793 
    794 -- 
    795 basti
    796  
    797 Government is a disease that masquerades as its own cure
    798 	-- Robert Lefevre
    799 
    800 From michael+sup@stapelberg.de  Sun Jan 23 07:17:41 2011
    801 From: michael+sup@stapelberg.de (Michael Stapelberg)
    802 Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:17:41 +0100
    803 Subject: [sup-talk] gpg-options.rb: how to set always_trust
    804 In-Reply-To: <1295770743-sup-9363@fly>
    805 References: <1295770743-sup-9363@fly>
    806 Message-ID: <1295784926-sup-5885@midna.zekjur.net>
    807 
    808 Hi Sebastian,
    809 
    810 Excerpts from Sebastian Lipp's message of 2011-01-23 09:25:58 +0100:
    811 > Any assistance in putting the right code snipped here would be
    812 > appreciated.
    813 See the wiki at http://sup.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?GPG, it has examples for
    814 hooks for sup >= 0.12.
    815 
    816 Best regards,
    817 Michael
    818 
    819 From bacuh@riseup.net  Sun Jan 23 17:09:01 2011
    820 From: bacuh@riseup.net (Sebastian Lipp)
    821 Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:09:01 +0100
    822 Subject: [sup-talk] gpg-options.rb: how to set always_trust
    823 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimJZiRE31R5KJBdqZv5L17qhKeLjbO4fWM5LfD2@mail.gmail.com>
    824 References: <1295770743-sup-9363@fly>
    825 	<AANLkTimJZiRE31R5KJBdqZv5L17qhKeLjbO4fWM5LfD2@mail.gmail.com>
    826 Message-ID: <1295820417-sup-1526@fly>
    827 
    828 Excerpts from Hamish D's message of So Jan 23 11:47:32 +0100 2011:
    829 > > I've just 'git pull'ed so my always_trust setting for GnuPG isn't
    830 > > working any more. I tried to set it by just putting
    831 > > ?{:always_trust => true}
    832 > > into gpg-options.rb but it doesn't work.
    833 > 
    834 > This may be slightly obscure,
    835 
    836 I expected it would, but as I said I have no clue about ruby. ;)
    837 
    838 > if operation == "encrypt"
    839 >   options.merge({:always_trust => true})
    840 > end
    841 > options
    842 
    843 That is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks.
    844 
    845 But another problem popped up. Now I can't sign any message. It makes no
    846 difference if gpg-options.rb is there or not. There is also no difference in
    847 choosing sign or sign and encrypt. There are no messages about that in
    848 the log even with debugging turned on. Have I found a bug?
    849 
    850 -- 
    851 basti
    852  
    853 The Web should be like a white sheet of paper: ready to be written on,
    854 with no control over what is written.
    855 	-- Tim Berners-Lee
    856 
    857 From rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu  Mon Jan 24 01:05:04 2011
    858 From: rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu (Rich Lane)
    859 Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:05:04 -0500
    860 Subject: [sup-talk] Sup 0.12.1 released
    861 Message-ID: <1295848539-sup-752@zyrg.net>
    862 
    863 I'm pleased to announce the release of Sup 0.12.1.
    864 
    865 Sup is a console-based email client for people with a lot of email.
    866 It supports tagging, very fast full-text search, automatic contact-
    867 list management, and more. If you're the type of person who treats
    868 email as an extension of your long-term memory, Sup is for you.
    869 
    870 Get it: gem install sup
    871 Learn it: http://sup.rubyforge.org
    872 Love it: sup-talk at rubyforge.org
    873 
    874 Release notes:
    875 
    876 This release changes the gem dependency on ncurses to ncursesw, which
    877 allows the gem to install cleanly on Ruby 1.9.
    878 
    879 The new sup-import-dump program applies labels to an existing index,
    880 which could be done with sup-sync before 0.12.
    881 
    882 Changelog for 0.12.1:
    883 
    884 * Depend on ncursesw rather than ncurses (Ruby 1.9 compatibility)
    885 * Add sup-import-dump
    886 
    887 From shadowfirebird@gmail.com  Mon Jan 24 04:15:13 2011
    888 From: shadowfirebird@gmail.com (Shadowfirebird)
    889 Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:15:13 +0000
    890 Subject: [sup-talk] gpg-options.rb: how to set always_trust
    891 In-Reply-To: <1295820417-sup-1526@fly>
    892 References: <1295770743-sup-9363@fly>
    893 	<AANLkTimJZiRE31R5KJBdqZv5L17qhKeLjbO4fWM5LfD2@mail.gmail.com>
    894 	<1295820417-sup-1526@fly>
    895 Message-ID: <1295860315-sup-4750@blake>
    896 
    897 > But another problem popped up. Now I can't sign any message. It makes no
    898 > difference if gpg-options.rb is there or not. There is also no difference in
    899 > choosing sign or sign and encrypt. There are no messages about that in
    900 > the log even with debugging turned on. Have I found a bug?
    901 
    902 I've just upgraded to 0.12.   On reading your post I tried signing a message and sending it to myself' it worked fine.  So I hazard to guess that it might be a problem with your hooks (or rather, with how the new Sup is reading your existing hook code.)  I only have a before-add-message and a mime-view hook set, so that would appear to be the likely difference between you and me.  
    903 
    904 Hope that helps.  Maybe you need to post your gpg-related hooks here...
    905 
    906 -- 
    907 "It's not just a computer -- it's your ass."
    908 		-- Cal Keegan
    909 
    910 From sup@zevv.nl  Mon Jan 24 00:20:47 2011
    911 From: sup@zevv.nl (Ico)
    912 Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 06:20:47 +0100
    913 Subject: [sup-talk] Bug reading/writing contacts with \" in them
    914 Message-ID: <1295845756-sup-308@pruts.nl>
    915 
    916 Hi all,
    917 
    918 I just found out about Sup yesterday, great stuff, thanks for that to all
    919 involved with development!
    920 
    921 I did run into a small bug yesterday though. I was able to analyze it a bit,
    922 but my Ruby is not good enough to propose a solid fix. 
    923 
    924 The problem occurs when contacts have a certain combination of backslashes and
    925 quotes in them. I 'imported' my mutt aliases with a simple script converting
    926 the format (too bad it is *almost* the same but not quite), and one of the
    927 contacts looked like this:
    928 
    929   somename: \"Some, Name\" <somename at somedomain.com>
    930 
    931 It seems there is a problem somewhere with parsing and writing out the backslashes, which
    932 get escaped each time sup saves the contact list, doubling the number of backslashes each time.
    933 
    934   somename: Some, Name\\ <somename at somedomain.com>
    935   somename: Some, Name\\\\ <somename at somedomain.com>
    936   somename: Some, Name\\\\\\\\ <somename at somedomain.com>
    937 
    938 and so on.
    939 
    940 I first got a hint something was wrong when I noticed that sup was starting up slower
    941 and slower each time, and took over 10 minutes after a few tries. It seems that the regexp
    942 at person.rb:79 
    943 
    944          when /(.+?) ((\S+?)@\S+) \3/
    945 
    946 goes haywire backtracking through all the backslashes, I guess the first .+?
    947 probably uses exponential time when trying to match the huge number of \'s
    948 
    949 Anyway, I did some quick trials to find where exaclty the bug is, but I
    950 couldn't come up with the proper fix right away. My problem has of course gone
    951 away by just removing the backslashes from the contacts file, but I hope
    952 somebody with more ruby-sense is willing to look into this one.
    953 
    954 Thanks,
    955 
    956 Ico
    957 
    958 -- 
    959 :wq
    960 ^X^Cy^K^X^C^C^C^C
    961 
    962 From dmishd@gmail.com  Mon Jan 24 05:34:28 2011
    963 From: dmishd@gmail.com (Hamish D)
    964 Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:34:28 +0000
    965 Subject: [sup-talk] gpg-options.rb: how to set always_trust
    966 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimB43mBbe-3EvRxZHCK_n9-Xy0mL1MHRGSO6MTf@mail.gmail.com>
    967 References: <1295770743-sup-9363@fly>
    968 	<AANLkTimJZiRE31R5KJBdqZv5L17qhKeLjbO4fWM5LfD2@mail.gmail.com>
    969 	<1295820417-sup-1526@fly> <1295860315-sup-4750@blake>
    970 	<AANLkTimrPK4Bt7z+uN5AkShp3uJSw3OdbR2A-R0p4RoA@mail.gmail.com>
    971 	<AANLkTimB43mBbe-3EvRxZHCK_n9-Xy0mL1MHRGSO6MTf@mail.gmail.com>
    972 Message-ID: <AANLkTimTV+qSRrVzMd=u7Z1egi2njbiHf2qqQDqOChqY@mail.gmail.com>
    973 
    974 Interesting ... it may well be a bug. As well as your hooks, could you let
    975 me know:
    976 
    977 * your gpg key type, including whether you have a separate sub key for
    978 signing. If your key is on public keyservers then the key ID could also be
    979 useful.
    980 * whether you use the gpgkey option in .sup/config.yaml
    981 
    982 I'll look into it in the next few days. I might even try constructing a gpg
    983 test suite for sup ...
    984 
    985 Hamish Downer
    986 On 24 Jan 2011 09:15, "Shadowfirebird" <shadowfirebird at gmail.com> wrote:
    987 -------------- next part --------------
    988 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    989 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20110124/7461c96d/attachment.html>
    990 
    991 From michael+sup@stapelberg.de  Mon Jan 24 13:20:13 2011
    992 From: michael+sup@stapelberg.de (Michael Stapelberg)
    993 Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:20:13 +0100
    994 Subject: [sup-talk] [PATCH] Re: Bug reading/writing contacts with \" in them
    995 In-Reply-To: <1295845756-sup-308@pruts.nl>
    996 References: <1295845756-sup-308@pruts.nl>
    997 Message-ID: <1295892863-sup-1896@midna.zekjur.net>
    998 
    999 Hi Ico,
   1000 
   1001 Excerpts from Ico's message of 2011-01-24 06:20:47 +0100:
   1002 > The problem occurs when contacts have a certain combination of backslashes and
   1003 > quotes in them. I 'imported' my mutt aliases with a simple script converting
   1004 > the format (too bad it is *almost* the same but not quite), and one of the
   1005 > contacts looked like this:
   1006 > 
   1007 >   somename: \"Some, Name\" <somename at somedomain.com>
   1008 As discussed on IRC, I?ve made the following findings:
   1009 
   1010  ? Some combinations of email addresses (phrase + addr-spec in RFC822
   1011    terminology) need to be escaped, for example when they contain a comma or a
   1012    quote.
   1013  ? This escaping happens in Person#full_address by using @name.inspect
   1014  ? Person#full_address also is used when saving contacts back to contacts.txt
   1015  ? Person#initialize partly strips the quotes (line 10/11), but does not handle
   1016    backslashes.
   1017 
   1018 Attached is a patch which fixes the issue. Input like "Rob, Post\" will first
   1019 be turned into "Rob, Post\\" when initially escaping, but will then stay "Rob,
   1020 Post\\" (no more exploding backslashes).
   1021 
   1022 Best regards,
   1023 Michael
   1024 -------------- next part --------------
   1025 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
   1026 Name: 0001-Bugfix-Un-escape-slashes-when-initializing-a-new-Per.patch
   1027 Type: application/octet-stream
   1028 Size: 798 bytes
   1029 Desc: not available
   1030 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20110124/f9e9ff63/attachment-0001.obj>
   1031 
   1032 From wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net  Mon Jan 24 13:40:49 2011
   1033 From: wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net (William Morgan)
   1034 Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:40:49 -0500
   1035 Subject: [sup-talk] call for new maintainers
   1036 Message-ID: <1295894044-sup-7965@masanjin.net>
   1037 
   1038 I said this in another thread on sup-devel, but I thought I'd give it a
   1039 broader audience.
   1040 
   1041 Rich is stepping down as maintainer due to lack of time (but will still
   1042 be around as a contributor). I personally have a little more time
   1043 nowadays than I did before. But I would rather spend it working on
   1044 features, including possible a new index backend.
   1045 
   1046 So, anyone who would be interested in the maintainership busywork of
   1047 collecting patches from sup-devel, making branches, and pushing
   1048 releases, please let me know. You must be familiar with git, Ruby and,
   1049 of course, Sup. I can provide a brief guide of how this all works.
   1050 
   1051 In exchange, you will have access to the secret Sup maintainer meetings
   1052 that take place in the smoky backrooms of various San Francisco bars.
   1053 
   1054 If multiple people are interested, we can set up a rotation so that no
   1055 one is stuck with it forever.
   1056 
   1057 If no one responds, I will continue to be your (not very responsive)
   1058 maintainer.
   1059 -- 
   1060 William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>
   1061 
   1062 From sup@zevv.nl  Tue Jan 25 05:17:57 2011
   1063 From: sup@zevv.nl (Ico)
   1064 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:17:57 +0100
   1065 Subject: [sup-talk] un-archiving an archived mail
   1066 Message-ID: <1295949814-sup-8566@pruts.nl>
   1067 
   1068 Hi all,
   1069 
   1070 Since yesterday I'm a sup user, and I'm quite impressed with the way
   1071 things work, great stuff.
   1072 
   1073 I had once annoyance though, and today on irc met somebody with the same
   1074 itch: if I (we) understand correctly, there is no way to 'unarchive' a
   1075 message once it is archived. 'undo' does the trick while the sup
   1076 session is still running, but afaik it is not possible to find an
   1077 archived mail and mark it 'unachived' or 'inbox'.
   1078 
   1079 Is there something I'm missing, or is this really not possible at the
   1080 moment ? Would it be possible to make the 'a' key a toggle like
   1081 'd'elete, so it is simple possible to unarchive an archived message by
   1082 hitting the 'a' key again ?
   1083 
   1084 Thanks,
   1085 
   1086 Ico
   1087 
   1088 -- 
   1089 :wq
   1090 ^X^Cy^K^X^C^C^C^C
   1091 
   1092 From wael.nasreddine@gmail.com  Tue Jan 25 05:34:32 2011
   1093 From: wael.nasreddine@gmail.com (Wael M. Nasreddine)
   1094 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:34:32 +0100
   1095 Subject: [sup-talk] un-archiving an archived mail
   1096 In-Reply-To: <1295949814-sup-8566@pruts.nl>
   1097 References: <1295949814-sup-8566@pruts.nl>
   1098 Message-ID: <AANLkTimhrxGptBa2epDM0m56p6aidNRtAMp2+dZ7NPTc@mail.gmail.com>
   1099 
   1100 Hey,
   1101 
   1102 Welcome to SUP :)
   1103 
   1104 Just add the inbox label to it ( move the cursor on the thread and press l,
   1105 l for like! and type inbox)
   1106 
   1107 This should work
   1108 
   1109 On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:17, Ico <sup at zevv.nl> wrote:
   1110 
   1111 > Hi all,
   1112 >
   1113 > Since yesterday I'm a sup user, and I'm quite impressed with the way
   1114 > things work, great stuff.
   1115 >
   1116 > I had once annoyance though, and today on irc met somebody with the same
   1117 > itch: if I (we) understand correctly, there is no way to 'unarchive' a
   1118 > message once it is archived. 'undo' does the trick while the sup
   1119 > session is still running, but afaik it is not possible to find an
   1120 > archived mail and mark it 'unachived' or 'inbox'.
   1121 >
   1122 > Is there something I'm missing, or is this really not possible at the
   1123 > moment ? Would it be possible to make the 'a' key a toggle like
   1124 > 'd'elete, so it is simple possible to unarchive an archived message by
   1125 > hitting the 'a' key again ?
   1126 >
   1127 > Thanks,
   1128 >
   1129 > Ico
   1130 >
   1131 > --
   1132 > :wq
   1133 > ^X^Cy^K^X^C^C^C^C
   1134 > _______________________________________________
   1135 > sup-talk mailing list
   1136 > sup-talk at rubyforge.org
   1137 > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
   1138 >
   1139 
   1140 
   1141 
   1142 -- 
   1143 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   1144 Wa?l Nasreddine
   1145 TechnoGate www.technogate.fr
   1146 mobile :  06.32.94.70.13
   1147 agence : 09.70.444.236
   1148 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   1149 -------------- next part --------------
   1150 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
   1151 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20110125/a8b0a29d/attachment.html>
   1152 
   1153 From aidecoe@aidecoe.name  Tue Jan 25 05:41:14 2011
   1154 From: aidecoe@aidecoe.name (=?utf-8?q?Amadeusz_=C5=BBo=C5=82nowski?=)
   1155 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:41:14 +0100
   1156 Subject: [sup-talk] un-archiving an archived mail
   1157 In-Reply-To: <1295949814-sup-8566@pruts.nl>
   1158 References: <1295949814-sup-8566@pruts.nl>
   1159 Message-ID: <1295951914-sup-9032@ittemni>
   1160 
   1161 Hi,
   1162 
   1163 Excerpts from Ico's message of Tue Jan 25 11:17:57 +0100 2011:
   1164 > Is there something I'm missing, or is this really not possible at the
   1165 > moment ? Would it be possible to make the 'a' key a toggle like
   1166 > 'd'elete, so it is simple possible to unarchive an archived message by
   1167 > hitting the 'a' key again ?
   1168 
   1169 'a' does work as toggle. :-)  To access archived msgs you need to
   1170 perform global search ('\' key).
   1171 -- 
   1172 Amadeusz ?o?nowski
   1173 
   1174 PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA  4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
   1175 -------------- next part --------------
   1176 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
   1177 Name: signature.asc
   1178 Type: application/pgp-signature
   1179 Size: 490 bytes
   1180 Desc: not available
   1181 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20110125/fd49da4c/attachment.bin>
   1182 
   1183 From ezyang@MIT.EDU  Tue Jan 25 05:39:48 2011
   1184 From: ezyang@MIT.EDU (Edward Z. Yang)
   1185 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 05:39:48 -0500
   1186 Subject: [sup-talk] un-archiving an archived mail
   1187 In-Reply-To: <1295949814-sup-8566@pruts.nl>
   1188 References: <1295949814-sup-8566@pruts.nl>
   1189 Message-ID: <1295951969-sup-9468@ezyang>
   1190 
   1191 I regularly use 'a' to unarchive mail.  What are you doing specifically?
   1192 
   1193 Edward
   1194 
   1195 From sascha-ml-reply-to-2011-1@silbe.org  Tue Jan 25 06:15:31 2011
   1196 From: sascha-ml-reply-to-2011-1@silbe.org (Sascha Silbe)
   1197 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:15:31 +0100
   1198 Subject: [sup-talk] un-archiving an archived mail
   1199 In-Reply-To: <1295949814-sup-8566@pruts.nl>
   1200 References: <1295949814-sup-8566@pruts.nl>
   1201 Message-ID: <1295954038-sup-293@xo15-sascha.sascha.silbe.org>
   1202 
   1203 Excerpts from Ico's message of Tue Jan 25 11:17:57 +0100 2011:
   1204 
   1205 > Is there something I'm missing, or is this really not possible at the
   1206 > moment ? Would it be possible to make the 'a' key a toggle like
   1207 > 'd'elete, so it is simple possible to unarchive an archived message by
   1208 > hitting the 'a' key again ?
   1209 
   1210 It already does, though only in search-results-mode, not in
   1211 thread-view-mode.
   1212 
   1213 Sascha
   1214 
   1215 -- 
   1216 http://sascha.silbe.org/
   1217 http://www.infra-silbe.de/
   1218 -------------- next part --------------
   1219 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
   1220 Name: signature.asc
   1221 Type: application/pgp-signature
   1222 Size: 494 bytes
   1223 Desc: not available
   1224 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20110125/247edfb2/attachment.bin>
   1225 
   1226 From matthieu.rakotojaona@gmail.com  Tue Jan 25 07:03:38 2011
   1227 From: matthieu.rakotojaona@gmail.com (Matthieu Rakotojaona)
   1228 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:03:38 +0100
   1229 Subject: [sup-talk] un-archiving an archived mail
   1230 In-Reply-To: <1295951914-sup-9032@ittemni>
   1231 References: <1295949814-sup-8566@pruts.nl> <1295951914-sup-9032@ittemni>
   1232 Message-ID: <1295956639-sup-510@Otokar>
   1233 
   1234 Hi ! I'm a new sup user and I have some questions.
   1235 
   1236 Excerpts from Amadeusz ?o?nowski's message of mar. janv. 25 11:41:14 +0100 2011:
   1237 > To access archived msgs you need to perform global search ('\' key).
   1238 
   1239 Specifically, how do you search for all your archives messages ? I thought 
   1240 about something like "search for 'not this label'", but I don't know how to do 
   1241 this.
   1242 
   1243 Thank you !
   1244 
   1245 -- 
   1246 
   1247 Matthieu Rakotojaona
   1248 
   1249 From wael.nasreddine@gmail.com  Tue Jan 25 09:19:10 2011
   1250 From: wael.nasreddine@gmail.com (Wael M. Nasreddine)
   1251 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:19:10 +0100
   1252 Subject: [sup-talk] call for new maintainers
   1253 In-Reply-To: <1295894044-sup-7965@masanjin.net>
   1254 References: <1295894044-sup-7965@masanjin.net>
   1255 Message-ID: <AANLkTiktGxmVWJCrc=BJdVvA6g3521VCvsF22scY_BhH@mail.gmail.com>
   1256 
   1257 Hello,
   1258 
   1259 How much work you estimate per week?
   1260 
   1261 I'm familiar with Ruby and Git, but I'm not very familiar with the code of
   1262 SUP itself as I haven't read it entirely yet.. I would gladly help sup but I
   1263 need to know first how much work to expect..
   1264 
   1265 Regards,
   1266 Wael Nasreddine
   1267 
   1268 On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 19:40, William Morgan <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>wrote:
   1269 
   1270 > I said this in another thread on sup-devel, but I thought I'd give it a
   1271 > broader audience.
   1272 >
   1273 > Rich is stepping down as maintainer due to lack of time (but will still
   1274 > be around as a contributor). I personally have a little more time
   1275 > nowadays than I did before. But I would rather spend it working on
   1276 > features, including possible a new index backend.
   1277 >
   1278 > So, anyone who would be interested in the maintainership busywork of
   1279 > collecting patches from sup-devel, making branches, and pushing
   1280 > releases, please let me know. You must be familiar with git, Ruby and,
   1281 > of course, Sup. I can provide a brief guide of how this all works.
   1282 >
   1283 > In exchange, you will have access to the secret Sup maintainer meetings
   1284 > that take place in the smoky backrooms of various San Francisco bars.
   1285 >
   1286 > If multiple people are interested, we can set up a rotation so that no
   1287 > one is stuck with it forever.
   1288 >
   1289 > If no one responds, I will continue to be your (not very responsive)
   1290 > maintainer.
   1291 > --
   1292 > William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>
   1293 > _______________________________________________
   1294 > sup-talk mailing list
   1295 > sup-talk at rubyforge.org
   1296 > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
   1297 >
   1298 
   1299 
   1300 
   1301 -- 
   1302 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   1303 Wa?l Nasreddine
   1304 TechnoGate www.technogate.fr
   1305 mobile :  06.32.94.70.13
   1306 agence : 09.70.444.236
   1307 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   1308 -------------- next part --------------
   1309 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
   1310 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20110125/397d204d/attachment.html>
   1311 
   1312 From bacuh@riseup.net  Tue Jan 25 09:32:56 2011
   1313 From: bacuh@riseup.net (Sebastian Lipp)
   1314 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:32:56 +0100
   1315 Subject: [sup-talk] gpg-options.rb: how to set always_trust
   1316 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimTV+qSRrVzMd=u7Z1egi2njbiHf2qqQDqOChqY@mail.gmail.com>
   1317 References: <1295770743-sup-9363@fly>
   1318 	<AANLkTimJZiRE31R5KJBdqZv5L17qhKeLjbO4fWM5LfD2@mail.gmail.com>
   1319 	<1295820417-sup-1526@fly> <1295860315-sup-4750@blake>
   1320 	<AANLkTimrPK4Bt7z+uN5AkShp3uJSw3OdbR2A-R0p4RoA@mail.gmail.com>
   1321 	<AANLkTimB43mBbe-3EvRxZHCK_n9-Xy0mL1MHRGSO6MTf@mail.gmail.com>
   1322 	<AANLkTimTV+qSRrVzMd=u7Z1egi2njbiHf2qqQDqOChqY@mail.gmail.com>
   1323 Message-ID: <1295964928-sup-1373@fly>
   1324 
   1325 Excerpts from Hamish D's message of Mo Jan 24 11:34:28 +0100 2011:
   1326 > * your gpg key type, including whether you have a separate sub key for
   1327 > signing. If your key is on public keyservers then the key ID could also be
   1328 > useful.
   1329 
   1330 A750401F
   1331 
   1332 > * whether you use the gpgkey option in .sup/config.yaml
   1333 
   1334 Yes, I do. I tried to delete this option and moved all my GPG-related
   1335 hooks out of sup's reach. The last thing I just tried was pulling again.
   1336 Nothing helped.
   1337 
   1338 In my last mail I told that I can't sign. That's not true (anymore). I
   1339 can sign but when I choose sign and encrypt there is no signature. Can't
   1340 say whether this was a misinformation by me or is related to the latest
   1341 pull.
   1342 
   1343 All I can tell is that it worked like a charm since I use sup. It might
   1344 be related to the change to GPGME.
   1345 
   1346 -- 
   1347 basti
   1348  
   1349 Die Zwingburg des Privateigentums wird fallen und auf ihren Tr?mmer wird
   1350 sich der Tempel des Kommunismus erheben.
   1351 Alle Festungen des Staates werden kapitulieren m?ssen, und in herrlicher
   1352 Gestalt wird sich zeigen der Genius der Anarchie.
   1353 Wer diesen Idealen zuzuschreiten entschlossen ist, der reiche uns die
   1354 H?nde!
   1355 	-- Johann Most
   1356 
   1357 From garoth@gmail.com  Tue Jan 25 11:24:16 2011
   1358 From: garoth@gmail.com (Andrei Thorp)
   1359 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:24:16 -0500
   1360 Subject: [sup-talk] Sup 0.12 released
   1361 In-Reply-To: <1295321122-sup-9696@zyrg.net>
   1362 References: <1295068347-sup-3453@zyrg.net>
   1363 	<AANLkTimE-40sx8xXxQbjz=Jok3FnWJZgmNTBiMObRahx@mail.gmail.com>
   1364 	<1295301694-sup-2240@eris> <1295321122-sup-9696@zyrg.net>
   1365 Message-ID: <AANLkTik=GqXrK9WOtA7CQrU51Tyeq7AoBQ6rGHB4iepg@mail.gmail.com>
   1366 
   1367 On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Rich Lane <rlane at club.cc.cmu.edu> wrote:
   1368 > Excerpts from Philipp ?berbacher's message of Mon Jan 17 17:03:23 -0500 2011:
   1369 >> There also seem to be huge problems building and installing sup 0.12,
   1370 >> have a look here to get an idea how much frustration it already caused:
   1371 >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26439
   1372 >
   1373 > I use Arch myself so I'm surprised there's been so much trouble
   1374 > packaging for it. Does gettext need to be a gem dependency? I've
   1375 > reconsidered the ncurses mess and master now requires ncursesw. I'm not
   1376 > convinced an Arch package should be using xapian-full - I only made that
   1377 > gem because I wanted the install process to be as simple as "gem install
   1378 > sup". The normal Arch Xapian package should work fine.
   1379 
   1380 Hey there Rich. I'm the package maintainer there and have certainly
   1381 had a never-ending cascade of trouble packaging it. Stuff ranging from
   1382 dire lack of aur packages for the dependencies (which prompted me to
   1383 write a system to automatically create them) to broken dependencies to
   1384 massive Sup errors in the upgrade to Ruby 1.9.
   1385 
   1386 Anyway, I still can't get it to run even with 0.12.1. Here's the
   1387 general situation (reposted partially from my comments there):
   1388 
   1389 * use ruby-xapian-full
   1390 * need gettext to be a gem and not a regular install... -- pacman -Rd
   1391 your ruby-gettext and sudo gem install ruby-gettext (STILL A PROBLEM,
   1392 SHOULD TALK TO THE MAINTAINER OF THAT PACKAGE)
   1393 * gem install sup:
   1394   - Won't install in local mode (i.e. into your ~), fyi (not that I care a lot)
   1395   - Still attempts to build ncurses (which fails)? Why's that? If I
   1396 override and install it without dependencies it seems to use ncursesw
   1397 happily enough.
   1398 * The new package throws up this runtime error without a .sup directory:
   1399 
   1400 --- RuntimeError from thread: main
   1401 can't modify frozen string
   1402 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/account.rb:54:in
   1403 `force_encoding'
   1404 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/account.rb:54:in
   1405 `block in add_account'
   1406 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/account.rb:54:in `each'
   1407 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/account.rb:54:in `add_account'
   1408 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/account.rb:38:in `initialize'
   1409 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/util.rb:613:in `new'
   1410 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/util.rb:613:in `init'
   1411 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup.rb:164:in `start'
   1412 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/bin/sup:153:in `<module:Redwood>'
   1413 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/bin/sup:69:in `<top (required)>'
   1414 /usr/bin/sup:19:in `load'
   1415 /usr/bin/sup:19:in `<main>'
   1416 
   1417 The above I've seen to be bug 98 on the bugtracker... but for whatever
   1418 reason, the bugtracker has been down for a week or two on my end.
   1419 
   1420 What xapian package do you recommend using? Maybe that's the source of
   1421 my problems.
   1422 
   1423 From garoth@gmail.com  Tue Jan 25 11:46:53 2011
   1424 From: garoth@gmail.com (Andrei Thorp)
   1425 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:46:53 -0500
   1426 Subject: [sup-talk] Sup 0.12 released
   1427 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik=GqXrK9WOtA7CQrU51Tyeq7AoBQ6rGHB4iepg@mail.gmail.com>
   1428 References: <1295068347-sup-3453@zyrg.net>
   1429 	<AANLkTimE-40sx8xXxQbjz=Jok3FnWJZgmNTBiMObRahx@mail.gmail.com>
   1430 	<1295301694-sup-2240@eris> <1295321122-sup-9696@zyrg.net>
   1431 	<AANLkTik=GqXrK9WOtA7CQrU51Tyeq7AoBQ6rGHB4iepg@mail.gmail.com>
   1432 Message-ID: <AANLkTi=QRBEFuj8EPHchoqDYL=SsAS2ZRt7=a-mM6tem@mail.gmail.com>
   1433 
   1434 On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Andrei Thorp <garoth at gmail.com> wrote:
   1435 > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Rich Lane <rlane at club.cc.cmu.edu> wrote:
   1436 >> Excerpts from Philipp ?berbacher's message of Mon Jan 17 17:03:23 -0500 2011:
   1437 >>> There also seem to be huge problems building and installing sup 0.12,
   1438 >>> have a look here to get an idea how much frustration it already caused:
   1439 >>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26439
   1440 >>
   1441 >> I use Arch myself so I'm surprised there's been so much trouble
   1442 >> packaging for it. Does gettext need to be a gem dependency? I've
   1443 >> reconsidered the ncurses mess and master now requires ncursesw. I'm not
   1444 >> convinced an Arch package should be using xapian-full - I only made that
   1445 >> gem because I wanted the install process to be as simple as "gem install
   1446 >> sup". The normal Arch Xapian package should work fine.
   1447 >
   1448 > Hey there Rich. I'm the package maintainer there and have certainly
   1449 > had a never-ending cascade of trouble packaging it. Stuff ranging from
   1450 > dire lack of aur packages for the dependencies (which prompted me to
   1451 > write a system to automatically create them) to broken dependencies to
   1452 > massive Sup errors in the upgrade to Ruby 1.9.
   1453 >
   1454 > Anyway, I still can't get it to run even with 0.12.1. Here's the
   1455 > general situation (reposted partially from my comments there):
   1456 >
   1457 > * use ruby-xapian-full
   1458 > * need gettext to be a gem and not a regular install... -- pacman -Rd
   1459 > your ruby-gettext and sudo gem install ruby-gettext (STILL A PROBLEM,
   1460 > SHOULD TALK TO THE MAINTAINER OF THAT PACKAGE)
   1461 > * gem install sup:
   1462 > ?- Won't install in local mode (i.e. into your ~), fyi (not that I care a lot)
   1463 > ?- Still attempts to build ncurses (which fails)? Why's that? If I
   1464 > override and install it without dependencies it seems to use ncursesw
   1465 > happily enough.
   1466 > * The new package throws up this runtime error without a .sup directory:
   1467 >
   1468 > --- RuntimeError from thread: main
   1469 > can't modify frozen string
   1470 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/account.rb:54:in
   1471 > `force_encoding'
   1472 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/account.rb:54:in
   1473 > `block in add_account'
   1474 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/account.rb:54:in `each'
   1475 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/account.rb:54:in `add_account'
   1476 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/account.rb:38:in `initialize'
   1477 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/util.rb:613:in `new'
   1478 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/util.rb:613:in `init'
   1479 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup.rb:164:in `start'
   1480 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/bin/sup:153:in `<module:Redwood>'
   1481 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/bin/sup:69:in `<top (required)>'
   1482 > /usr/bin/sup:19:in `load'
   1483 > /usr/bin/sup:19:in `<main>'
   1484 >
   1485 > The above I've seen to be bug 98 on the bugtracker... but for whatever
   1486 > reason, the bugtracker has been down for a week or two on my end.
   1487 >
   1488 > What xapian package do you recommend using? Maybe that's the source of
   1489 > my problems.
   1490 
   1491 It also likes to indulge in this error on occasion:
   1492 
   1493 /usr/bin/ruby: symbol lookup error:
   1494 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/lib/ncursesw_bin.so:
   1495 undefined symbol: STR2CSTR
   1496 
   1497 From aidecoe@aidecoe.name  Tue Jan 25 11:55:33 2011
   1498 From: aidecoe@aidecoe.name (=?utf-8?q?Amadeusz_=C5=BBo=C5=82nowski?=)
   1499 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:55:33 +0100
   1500 Subject: [sup-talk] un-archiving an archived mail
   1501 In-Reply-To: <1295956639-sup-510@Otokar>
   1502 References: <1295949814-sup-8566@pruts.nl> <1295951914-sup-9032@ittemni>
   1503 	<1295956639-sup-510@Otokar>
   1504 Message-ID: <1295974275-sup-8649@ittemni>
   1505 
   1506 Excerpts from Matthieu Rakotojaona's message of Tue Jan 25 13:03:38
   1507 +0100 2011:
   1508 > Excerpts from Amadeusz ?o?nowski's message of mar. janv. 25 11:41:14
   1509 > +0100 2011:
   1510 > > To access archived msgs you need to perform global search ('\' key).
   1511 > 
   1512 > Specifically, how do you search for all your archives messages ? I
   1513 > thought about something like "search for 'not this label'", but I
   1514 > don't know how to do this.
   1515 
   1516 Well, you almost never want to see all your mail.  Big amount of
   1517 information kills.  You might want for example to search for all
   1518 messages that you received after Monday and which are not in the inbox.
   1519 You press '\' and type: "after:Mon AND NOT label:inbox" (without "").
   1520 
   1521 Take a look at sup's wiki for more information on searching.
   1522 -- 
   1523 Amadeusz ?o?nowski
   1524 
   1525 PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA  4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5
   1526 -------------- next part --------------
   1527 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
   1528 Name: signature.asc
   1529 Type: application/pgp-signature
   1530 Size: 490 bytes
   1531 Desc: not available
   1532 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20110125/cf37fbcc/attachment.bin>
   1533 
   1534 From marc.hartstein@alum.vassar.edu  Tue Jan 25 12:25:24 2011
   1535 From: marc.hartstein@alum.vassar.edu (Marc Hartstein)
   1536 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:25:24 -0500
   1537 Subject: [sup-talk] un-archiving an archived mail
   1538 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimhrxGptBa2epDM0m56p6aidNRtAMp2+dZ7NPTc@mail.gmail.com>
   1539 References: <1295949814-sup-8566@pruts.nl>
   1540 	<AANLkTimhrxGptBa2epDM0m56p6aidNRtAMp2+dZ7NPTc@mail.gmail.com>
   1541 Message-ID: <1295976196-sup-7917@cabinet>
   1542 
   1543 Excerpts from Wael M. Nasreddine's message of Tue Jan 25 05:34:32 -0500 2011:
   1544 > Just add the inbox label to it ( move the cursor on the thread and press l,
   1545 > l for like! and type inbox)
   1546 > 
   1547 > This should work
   1548 
   1549 Frustratingly, it doesn't. You can't add 'reserved' labels using 'l'.
   1550 
   1551 I have no idea why that's the case, though.
   1552 -------------- next part --------------
   1553 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
   1554 Name: signature.asc
   1555 Type: application/pgp-signature
   1556 Size: 198 bytes
   1557 Desc: not available
   1558 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20110125/4804b853/attachment.bin>
   1559 
   1560 From luislupe@gmail.com  Tue Jan 25 19:00:38 2011
   1561 From: luislupe@gmail.com (Luis P. Mendes)
   1562 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:00:38 +0000
   1563 Subject: [sup-talk] Problem undefined symbol
   1564 Message-ID: <AANLkTik+UZqxkFb3KpWR93+5b=BX4YrvwqFtwSUZTic7@mail.gmail.com>
   1565 
   1566 Hi,
   1567 
   1568 I installed sup version 12.1 and tried to run it.
   1569 I'm using Slackware64 13.1 and had sup V 0.11 installed before.
   1570 
   1571 $ sup
   1572 [2011-01-25 23:52:33 +0000] WARNING: can't find character set by using
   1573 locale, defaulting to utf-8
   1574 /usr/bin/ruby: symbol lookup error:
   1575 /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/x86_64-linux/dl.so: undefined symbol:
   1576 rb_dl_init_callbacks_5
   1577 
   1578 $ cat sup-exception-log.txt
   1579 /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/index.rb:113:in `load_index'
   1580 /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/index.rb:93:in `load'
   1581 /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/bin/sup-sync:100:in `<top
   1582 (required)>'
   1583 /usr/bin/sup-sync:19:in `load'
   1584 /usr/bin/sup-sync:19:in `<main>'
   1585 
   1586 What can I do to have sup running in my box?
   1587 
   1588 
   1589 Luis
   1590 
   1591 From tero@tilus.net  Wed Jan 26 02:43:45 2011
   1592 From: tero@tilus.net (Tero Tilus)
   1593 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:43:45 +0200
   1594 Subject: [sup-talk] Problem undefined symbol
   1595 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik+UZqxkFb3KpWR93+5b=BX4YrvwqFtwSUZTic7@mail.gmail.com>
   1596 References: <AANLkTik+UZqxkFb3KpWR93+5b=BX4YrvwqFtwSUZTic7@mail.gmail.com>
   1597 Message-ID: <1296027550-sup-4996@tilus.net>
   1598 
   1599 Luis P. Mendes, 2011-01-26 02:00:
   1600 > I installed sup version 12.1 and tried to run it.
   1601 > I'm using Slackware64 13.1 and had sup V 0.11 installed before.
   1602 
   1603 Does 0.11 still work?
   1604 
   1605 > $ sup
   1606 > [2011-01-25 23:52:33 +0000] WARNING: can't find character set by using
   1607 > locale, defaulting to utf-8
   1608 > /usr/bin/ruby: symbol lookup error:
   1609 > /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/x86_64-linux/dl.so: undefined symbol:
   1610 > rb_dl_init_callbacks_5
   1611 
   1612 I'd guess you have either have your ruby or gem C extensions somehow
   1613 fscked up.  Error in lib/sup/index.rb suggests the problem might be
   1614 xapian-related.  Other than that I really have no idea whats going on.
   1615 You could try both xapian and xapian-full gems (and uninstall the
   1616 other one).
   1617 
   1618 -- 
   1619 Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/
   1620 
   1621 From sup@zevv.nl  Wed Jan 26 08:12:03 2011
   1622 From: sup@zevv.nl (Ico Doornekamp)
   1623 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:12:03 +0100
   1624 Subject: [sup-talk] Non-english outlook block quote regexp
   1625 Message-ID: <1296046853-sup-2234@pruts.nl>
   1626 
   1627 Hi,
   1628 
   1629 I'm unfortunate enough to have regular correspondence with Dutch
   1630 outlook-users, which is mostly annoying because of the way outlook
   1631 handles quoting of original messages.
   1632 
   1633 I found that Sup is able to handle block quotes from English outlook
   1634 users where the regexp
   1635 
   1636   ^-----\s*Original Message\s*----+$
   1637 
   1638 is used to find out where the quote starts. This fails unfortunately for
   1639 other languages, because the 'Original Mesage' text seems to be
   1640 localized. In dutch for example, the text 'Oorspronkelik Bericht' is
   1641 used instead.
   1642 
   1643 Would it be an impovement to change this to a more generic regexp to
   1644 match more languages. I was not able to find a complete list of possible
   1645 strings used here, so some heuristics would be necassery.
   1646 
   1647 Any opinions on matching the exact number of hashes, two uppercase words
   1648 and again the exact number of hashes, something like:
   1649 
   1650   ^-----\s*([A-Z][a-z]+\s*){2}----+$
   1651 
   1652 Would that be safe to do ?
   1653 
   1654 
   1655 
   1656 -- 
   1657 :wq
   1658 ^X^Cy^K^X^C^C^C^C
   1659 
   1660 From wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net  Wed Jan 26 10:50:15 2011
   1661 From: wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net (William Morgan)
   1662 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:50:15 -0500
   1663 Subject: [sup-talk] Sup 0.12 released
   1664 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik=GqXrK9WOtA7CQrU51Tyeq7AoBQ6rGHB4iepg@mail.gmail.com>
   1665 References: <1295068347-sup-3453@zyrg.net>
   1666 	<AANLkTimE-40sx8xXxQbjz=Jok3FnWJZgmNTBiMObRahx@mail.gmail.com>
   1667 	<1295301694-sup-2240@eris> <1295321122-sup-9696@zyrg.net>
   1668 	<AANLkTik=GqXrK9WOtA7CQrU51Tyeq7AoBQ6rGHB4iepg@mail.gmail.com>
   1669 Message-ID: <1296056218-sup-3756@masanjin.net>
   1670 
   1671 Hi Andrei,
   1672 
   1673 These problems are all 1.9 related. But I'm very interested in getting
   1674 Sup working with 1.9, so let's see if we can figure something out.
   1675 
   1676 Reformatted excerpts from Andrei Thorp's message of 2011-01-25:
   1677 > * use ruby-xapian-full
   1678 
   1679 You may not need this; see Rich's comments earlier.
   1680 
   1681 > * need gettext to be a gem and not a regular install... -- pacman -Rd
   1682 > your ruby-gettext and sudo gem install ruby-gettext (STILL A PROBLEM,
   1683 > SHOULD TALK TO THE MAINTAINER OF THAT PACKAGE)
   1684 
   1685 Perhaps the package has not been updated to 1.9?
   1686 
   1687 > * gem install sup:
   1688 >   - Won't install in local mode (i.e. into your ~), fyi (not that I care a lot)
   1689 
   1690 What is ther error? Sup shouldn't care where its source files go.
   1691 
   1692 >   - Still attempts to build ncurses (which fails)? Why's that? If I
   1693 > override and install it without dependencies it seems to use ncursesw
   1694 > happily enough.
   1695 
   1696 This is weird. Sup doesn't depend on the ncurses gem any more. And that
   1697 gem doesn't build under 1.9. Sup now depends on the ncursesw gem (which
   1698 Rich has been releasing newer versions of) which *does* support 1.9.
   1699 
   1700 > * The new package throws up this runtime error without a .sup directory:
   1701 > 
   1702 > --- RuntimeError from thread: main
   1703 > can't modify frozen string
   1704 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/account.rb:54:in
   1705 > `force_encoding'
   1706 
   1707 This is the most troubling. I will see if I can figure out what's going
   1708 on here. I've seen this before and it's another symptom of Ruby 1.9
   1709 string insanity.
   1710 
   1711 > The above I've seen to be bug 98 on the bugtracker... but for whatever
   1712 > reason, the bugtracker has been down for a week or two on my end.
   1713 
   1714 Due to spam reasons I've shut it down, at least for the time being.
   1715 
   1716 > What xapian package do you recommend using? Maybe that's the source of
   1717 > my problems.
   1718 
   1719 I suspect not, given the above.
   1720 -- 
   1721 William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>
   1722 
   1723 From wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net  Wed Jan 26 10:52:52 2011
   1724 From: wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net (William Morgan)
   1725 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:52:52 -0500
   1726 Subject: [sup-talk] Sup 0.12 released
   1727 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=QRBEFuj8EPHchoqDYL=SsAS2ZRt7=a-mM6tem@mail.gmail.com>
   1728 References: <1295068347-sup-3453@zyrg.net>
   1729 	<AANLkTimE-40sx8xXxQbjz=Jok3FnWJZgmNTBiMObRahx@mail.gmail.com>
   1730 	<1295301694-sup-2240@eris> <1295321122-sup-9696@zyrg.net>
   1731 	<AANLkTik=GqXrK9WOtA7CQrU51Tyeq7AoBQ6rGHB4iepg@mail.gmail.com>
   1732 	<AANLkTi=QRBEFuj8EPHchoqDYL=SsAS2ZRt7=a-mM6tem@mail.gmail.com>
   1733 Message-ID: <1296057034-sup-1364@masanjin.net>
   1734 
   1735 Reformatted excerpts from Andrei Thorp's message of 2011-01-25:
   1736 > It also likes to indulge in this error on occasion:
   1737 > 
   1738 > /usr/bin/ruby: symbol lookup error:
   1739 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/lib/ncursesw_bin.so:
   1740 > undefined symbol: STR2CSTR
   1741 
   1742 Can you try with the 1.2.4.3? This is a 1.9 compability issue. If it's
   1743 still not working, Rich may have an idea (Rich, perhaps compat.h is not
   1744 being included somewhere?)
   1745 -- 
   1746 William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>
   1747 
   1748 From rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu  Wed Jan 26 13:22:35 2011
   1749 From: rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu (Rich Lane)
   1750 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:22:35 -0500
   1751 Subject: [sup-talk] Sup 0.12 released
   1752 In-Reply-To: <1296057034-sup-1364@masanjin.net>
   1753 References: <1295068347-sup-3453@zyrg.net>
   1754 	<AANLkTimE-40sx8xXxQbjz=Jok3FnWJZgmNTBiMObRahx@mail.gmail.com>
   1755 	<1295301694-sup-2240@eris> <1295321122-sup-9696@zyrg.net>
   1756 	<AANLkTik=GqXrK9WOtA7CQrU51Tyeq7AoBQ6rGHB4iepg@mail.gmail.com>
   1757 	<AANLkTi=QRBEFuj8EPHchoqDYL=SsAS2ZRt7=a-mM6tem@mail.gmail.com>
   1758 	<1296057034-sup-1364@masanjin.net>
   1759 Message-ID: <1296065958-sup-8939@zyrg.net>
   1760 
   1761 Excerpts from William Morgan's message of 2011-01-26 10:52:52 -0500:
   1762 > Reformatted excerpts from Andrei Thorp's message of 2011-01-25:
   1763 > > It also likes to indulge in this error on occasion:
   1764 > > 
   1765 > > /usr/bin/ruby: symbol lookup error:
   1766 > > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/lib/ncursesw_bin.so:
   1767 > > undefined symbol: STR2CSTR
   1768 > 
   1769 > Can you try with the 1.2.4.3? This is a 1.9 compability issue. If it's
   1770 > still not working, Rich may have an idea (Rich, perhaps compat.h is not
   1771 > being included somewhere?)
   1772 
   1773 Yeah, 1.2.4.3 fixes compat.h not being included in menu_wrap.c.
   1774 
   1775 From wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net  Wed Jan 26 14:11:59 2011
   1776 From: wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net (William Morgan)
   1777 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:11:59 -0500
   1778 Subject: [sup-talk] Sup 0.12 released
   1779 In-Reply-To: <1296065958-sup-8939@zyrg.net>
   1780 References: <1295068347-sup-3453@zyrg.net>
   1781 	<AANLkTimE-40sx8xXxQbjz=Jok3FnWJZgmNTBiMObRahx@mail.gmail.com>
   1782 	<1295301694-sup-2240@eris> <1295321122-sup-9696@zyrg.net>
   1783 	<AANLkTik=GqXrK9WOtA7CQrU51Tyeq7AoBQ6rGHB4iepg@mail.gmail.com>
   1784 	<AANLkTi=QRBEFuj8EPHchoqDYL=SsAS2ZRt7=a-mM6tem@mail.gmail.com>
   1785 	<1296057034-sup-1364@masanjin.net> <1296065958-sup-8939@zyrg.net>
   1786 Message-ID: <1296069110-sup-1872@masanjin.net>
   1787 
   1788 Reformatted excerpts from Rich Lane's message of 2011-01-26:
   1789 > Yeah, 1.2.4.3 fixes compat.h not being included in menu_wrap.c.
   1790 
   1791 Damn I'm good.
   1792 -- 
   1793 William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>
   1794 
   1795 From dmishd@gmail.com  Wed Jan 26 18:59:24 2011
   1796 From: dmishd@gmail.com (Hamish D)
   1797 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:59:24 +0000
   1798 Subject: [sup-talk] problem starting sup
   1799 Message-ID: <AANLkTi=ZX0cT-fiT7DeETx7wbO77wZeLJk86_zhbkqGF@mail.gmail.com>
   1800 
   1801 I have a strange problem when trying to start sup from master. I am
   1802 running Ubuntu 10.10 x86_64. I have installed ruby and rubygems from
   1803 the archive, but installed all the gems with "gem install" and sup is
   1804 from git. I don't seem to be able to install xapian due to it looking
   1805 for some 32 bit libraries on a path that doesn't exist on my 64 bit
   1806 system, so I have installed the xapian-full gem, which installs fine.
   1807 
   1808 When I start sup I get:
   1809 
   1810 $ SUP_LOG_LEVEL=debug ruby -I /home/mish/dev/sup/sup-mainline/lib -w
   1811 /home/mish/dev/sup/sup-mainline/bin/sup
   1812 ...
   1813 [Wed Jan 26 23:58:42 +0000 2011] locking /home/mish/.sup/lock...
   1814 /home/mish/dev/sup/sup-mainline/lib/sup/index.rb:84: warning: instance
   1815 variable @lock_update_thread not initialized
   1816 /home/mish/dev/sup/sup-mainline/lib/sup/util.rb:602:in
   1817 `method_missing': no Redwood::HookManager instance defined in method
   1818 call to run! (RuntimeError)
   1819 	from /home/mish/dev/sup/sup-mainline/bin/sup:381
   1820 
   1821 Any ideas?
   1822 
   1823 Hamish Downer
   1824 
   1825 From marco-oweber@gmx.de  Wed Jan 26 19:24:24 2011
   1826 From: marco-oweber@gmx.de (Marc Weber)
   1827 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 01:24:24 +0100
   1828 Subject: [sup-talk] problem starting sup
   1829 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ZX0cT-fiT7DeETx7wbO77wZeLJk86_zhbkqGF@mail.gmail.com>
   1830 References: <AANLkTi=ZX0cT-fiT7DeETx7wbO77wZeLJk86_zhbkqGF@mail.gmail.com>
   1831 Message-ID: <1296087829-sup-1828@localhost.localdomain>
   1832 
   1833 Excerpts from Hamish D's message of Thu Jan 27 00:59:24 +0100 2011:
   1834 > Any ideas?
   1835 
   1836 No, but you should talk about ruby --version output
   1837 and the git version of sup you're using?
   1838 
   1839 Marc Weber
   1840 
   1841 From wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net  Wed Jan 26 20:57:36 2011
   1842 From: wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net (William Morgan)
   1843 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:57:36 -0500
   1844 Subject: [sup-talk] problem starting sup
   1845 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ZX0cT-fiT7DeETx7wbO77wZeLJk86_zhbkqGF@mail.gmail.com>
   1846 References: <AANLkTi=ZX0cT-fiT7DeETx7wbO77wZeLJk86_zhbkqGF@mail.gmail.com>
   1847 Message-ID: <1296093042-sup-322@masanjin.net>
   1848 
   1849 Reformatted excerpts from Hamish D's message of 2011-01-26:
   1850 > `method_missing': no Redwood::HookManager instance defined in method
   1851 > call to run! (RuntimeError)
   1852 >     from /home/mish/dev/sup/sup-mainline/bin/sup:381
   1853 
   1854 This is masking another exception. Something is breaking before
   1855 HookManager is initialized, and in rescuing from it, we try and run the
   1856 shutdown hook, which of course dies.
   1857 
   1858 Can you comment out that line? Or maybe try commenting out the three
   1859 lines starting with rescue and ending with ensure at line 372 in
   1860 bin/sup? This should at least unmask the exception.
   1861 
   1862 Initting the hookmanager happens very early on in Sup, so I'm guessing
   1863 there's something wrong with your config file or the log file (the only
   1864 two things that happen before the hookmanager is brought up).
   1865 -- 
   1866 William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>
   1867 
   1868 From tero@tilus.net  Thu Jan 27 08:29:22 2011
   1869 From: tero@tilus.net (Tero Tilus)
   1870 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:29:22 +0200
   1871 Subject: [sup-talk] Non-english outlook block quote regexp
   1872 In-Reply-To: <1296046853-sup-2234@pruts.nl>
   1873 References: <1296046853-sup-2234@pruts.nl>
   1874 Message-ID: <1296131602-sup-9793@tilus.net>
   1875 
   1876 Ico Doornekamp, 2011-01-26 15:12:
   1877 > Any opinions on matching the exact number of hashes, two uppercase words
   1878 > and again the exact number of hashes, something like:
   1879 > 
   1880 >   ^-----\s*([A-Z][a-z]+\s*){2}----+$
   1881 > 
   1882 > Would that be safe to do ?
   1883 
   1884 Prolly safe, but it misses german Outlook quote
   1885 
   1886   "-------- Original-Nachricht --------"
   1887 
   1888 and yes, it has different amount of dashes :-O Also it misses finnish
   1889 quote (for two obvious reason).
   1890 
   1891   "-----Alkuper?inen viesti-----"
   1892 
   1893 Would ^-----+\s*\S+[ -]\S+\s*-----+$ do the trick and not give false
   1894 positives?
   1895 
   1896 ps.  I have occasionaly thought of configurable quote etc. regexen.
   1897 Would anybody else use such a feature?  Or should we go all the way to
   1898 state-transition-hook for state machine parsing message body?  :)
   1899 
   1900 -- 
   1901 Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/
   1902 
   1903 From michael+sup@stapelberg.de  Thu Jan 27 10:00:10 2011
   1904 From: michael+sup@stapelberg.de (Michael Stapelberg)
   1905 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:00:10 +0100
   1906 Subject: [sup-talk] Non-english outlook block quote regexp
   1907 In-Reply-To: <1296131602-sup-9793@tilus.net>
   1908 References: <1296046853-sup-2234@pruts.nl> <1296131602-sup-9793@tilus.net>
   1909 Message-ID: <1296140298-sup-9582@midna.zekjur.net>
   1910 
   1911 Hi Tero,
   1912 
   1913 Excerpts from Tero Tilus's message of 2011-01-27 14:29:22 +0100:
   1914 > Prolly safe, but it misses german Outlook quote
   1915 We also discussed this on IRC. Ico came up with a list of a few more
   1916 (localized) messages. I suggested the most pragmatic solution: keeping this
   1917 list around with a comment to send patches if anybody stumbles upon a new
   1918 localized version of it.
   1919 
   1920 I don?t really think a hook is a good way for this one because the user should
   1921 not be the one who has to maintain an accurate and up-to-date list of these
   1922 strings?
   1923 
   1924 Best regards,
   1925 Michael
   1926 
   1927 From garoth@gmail.com  Thu Jan 27 13:51:49 2011
   1928 From: garoth@gmail.com (Andrei Thorp)
   1929 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:51:49 -0500
   1930 Subject: [sup-talk] Sup 0.12 released
   1931 In-Reply-To: <1296056218-sup-3756@masanjin.net>
   1932 References: <1295068347-sup-3453@zyrg.net>
   1933 	<AANLkTimE-40sx8xXxQbjz=Jok3FnWJZgmNTBiMObRahx@mail.gmail.com>
   1934 	<1295301694-sup-2240@eris> <1295321122-sup-9696@zyrg.net>
   1935 	<AANLkTik=GqXrK9WOtA7CQrU51Tyeq7AoBQ6rGHB4iepg@mail.gmail.com>
   1936 	<1296056218-sup-3756@masanjin.net>
   1937 Message-ID: <AANLkTi=MTP05C-ZVVi=q5+giXctgfZNtwGrgPQ_t6Ljn@mail.gmail.com>
   1938 
   1939 On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:50 AM, William Morgan
   1940 <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net> wrote:
   1941 > Hi Andrei,
   1942 >
   1943 > These problems are all 1.9 related. But I'm very interested in getting
   1944 > Sup working with 1.9, so let's see if we can figure something out.
   1945 >
   1946 > Reformatted excerpts from Andrei Thorp's message of 2011-01-25:
   1947 >> * use ruby-xapian-full
   1948 >
   1949 > You may not need this; see Rich's comments earlier.
   1950 
   1951 Yeah, I tried it with regular xapian-ruby-bindings, but sup seems to
   1952 insist on wanting "ruby-full" as a dependency. However, I haven't
   1953 checked this just now, so I might be misremembering!
   1954 
   1955 >
   1956 >> * need gettext to be a gem and not a regular install... -- pacman -Rd
   1957 >> your ruby-gettext and sudo gem install ruby-gettext (STILL A PROBLEM,
   1958 >> SHOULD TALK TO THE MAINTAINER OF THAT PACKAGE)
   1959 >
   1960 > Perhaps the package has not been updated to 1.9?
   1961 
   1962 The package is up to date, I think. It's just doing an actual source
   1963 download and compile, so it's being installed in a non-gem format, if
   1964 I understand correctly. Sup then doesn't find it. This should be
   1965 something I can sort out myself though amongst the AUR. Again, not
   1966 100% sure on this one.
   1967 
   1968 >> * gem install sup:
   1969 >> ? - Won't install in local mode (i.e. into your ~), fyi (not that I care a lot)
   1970 >
   1971 > What is ther error? Sup shouldn't care where its source files go.
   1972 
   1973 Yeah, ignore this. I think rubygems changed the behaviour I used to
   1974 remember where if you weren't sudo'd, it'd install as your local user
   1975 in ~/.gems or something. Nothing to worry about.
   1976 
   1977 >> ? - Still attempts to build ncurses (which fails)? Why's that? If I
   1978 >> override and install it without dependencies it seems to use ncursesw
   1979 >> happily enough.
   1980 >
   1981 > This is weird. Sup doesn't depend on the ncurses gem any more. And that
   1982 > gem doesn't build under 1.9. Sup now depends on the ncursesw gem (which
   1983 > Rich has been releasing newer versions of) which *does* support 1.9.
   1984 
   1985 I did experience this, but for whatever reason, gem is taking ages at
   1986 the moment so I can't test. Anyway, it doesn't matter for the package,
   1987 since I ignore gem dependencies during install and get them from the
   1988 Arch repos instead.
   1989 
   1990 >> * The new package throws up this runtime error without a .sup directory:
   1991 >>
   1992 >> --- RuntimeError from thread: main
   1993 >> can't modify frozen string
   1994 >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/account.rb:54:in
   1995 >> `force_encoding'
   1996 >
   1997 > This is the most troubling. I will see if I can figure out what's going
   1998 > on here. I've seen this before and it's another symptom of Ruby 1.9
   1999 > string insanity.
   2000 >
   2001 >> The above I've seen to be bug 98 on the bugtracker... but for whatever
   2002 >> reason, the bugtracker has been down for a week or two on my end.
   2003 >
   2004 > Due to spam reasons I've shut it down, at least for the time being.
   2005 
   2006 Ew, spam :(
   2007 
   2008 >> What xapian package do you recommend using? Maybe that's the source of
   2009 >> my problems.
   2010 >
   2011 > I suspect not, given the above.
   2012 
   2013 PHENOMENAL NEWS! For the first time in ages, Sup now works properly on
   2014 Archlinux with ruby 1.9. The update to ncursesw fixes the frozen
   2015 string issue, and sup seems to be running properly! Fantastic! Ahh,
   2016 it's so pretty and blue. :D
   2017 
   2018 Anyway, so hopefully things should be smoother now since Ruby should
   2019 be more stable and its libs are finally catching up. It's been a bit
   2020 of a pain to get sup to run on Arch in the past, but hopefully that's
   2021 largely behind us now. Thanks everyone.
   2022 
   2023 From garoth@gmail.com  Thu Jan 27 14:16:44 2011
   2024 From: garoth@gmail.com (Andrei Thorp)
   2025 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:16:44 -0500
   2026 Subject: [sup-talk] Need a simple check / nice error message for user error
   2027  on mbox being a dir
   2028 Message-ID: <AANLkTimwsQMLrpLgtWKjZ6A35b81MrR9Tomxq67VD3dr@mail.gmail.com>
   2029 
   2030 Scanning mbox:/var/spool/mail/thought...
   2031 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/mbox.rb:155:in
   2032 `gets': Is a directory - /var/spool/mail/thought (Errno::EISDIR)
   2033 	from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/mbox.rb:155:in
   2034 `block in next_offset'
   2035 	from <internal:prelude>:10:in `synchronize'
   2036 	from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/mbox.rb:152:in
   2037 `next_offset'
   2038 	from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/mbox.rb:169:in
   2039 `first_new_message'
   2040 	from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/mbox.rb:139:in `poll'
   2041 	from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/poll.rb:155:in
   2042 `poll_from'
   2043 	from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/util.rb:609:in
   2044 `method_missing'
   2045 	from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/bin/sup-sync:123:in
   2046 `block in <top (required)>'
   2047 	from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/bin/sup-sync:118:in `each'
   2048 	from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/bin/sup-sync:118:in
   2049 `<top (required)>'
   2050 	from /usr/bin/sup-sync:19:in `load'
   2051 	from /usr/bin/sup-sync:19:in `<main>'
   2052 
   2053 Obviously a simple user error here. Would be nice if sup knew to throw
   2054 a nicer error here. Not a big deal!
   2055 
   2056 From tero@tilus.net  Thu Jan 27 15:59:00 2011
   2057 From: tero@tilus.net (Tero Tilus)
   2058 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:59:00 +0200
   2059 Subject: [sup-talk] Need a simple check / nice error message for user
   2060 	error on mbox being a dir
   2061 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimwsQMLrpLgtWKjZ6A35b81MrR9Tomxq67VD3dr@mail.gmail.com>
   2062 References: <AANLkTimwsQMLrpLgtWKjZ6A35b81MrR9Tomxq67VD3dr@mail.gmail.com>
   2063 Message-ID: <1296161278-sup-5120@tilus.net>
   2064 
   2065 Andrei Thorp, 2011-01-27 21:16:
   2066 > Scanning mbox:/var/spool/mail/thought...
   2067 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.12.1/lib/sup/mbox.rb:155:in
   2068 > `gets': Is a directory - /var/spool/mail/thought (Errno::EISDIR)
   2069 ...
   2070 > Obviously a simple user error here. Would be nice if sup knew to throw
   2071 > a nicer error here. Not a big deal!
   2072 
   2073 Did you mean sup should detect if mbox source actually points to a
   2074 maildir (was /var/spool/mail/thought a maildir?) and suggest a
   2075 correction to configuration or that sup wouldn't crash but reported
   2076 "/var/spool/mail/thought Is a directory. File was expected."
   2077 
   2078 -- 
   2079 Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/
   2080 
   2081 From sup@zevv.nl  Fri Jan 28 04:24:22 2011
   2082 From: sup@zevv.nl (Ico Doornekamp)
   2083 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:24:22 +0100
   2084 Subject: [sup-talk] Non-english outlook block quote regexp
   2085 In-Reply-To: <1296140298-sup-9582@midna.zekjur.net>
   2086 References: <1296046853-sup-2234@pruts.nl> <1296131602-sup-9793@tilus.net>
   2087 	<1296140298-sup-9582@midna.zekjur.net>
   2088 Message-ID: <1296206571-sup-1285@pruts.nl>
   2089 
   2090 * On Thu Jan 27 16:00:10 +0100 2011, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
   2091  
   2092 > Excerpts from Tero Tilus's message of 2011-01-27 14:29:22 +0100:
   2093 > > Prolly safe, but it misses german Outlook quote
   2094 > We also discussed this on IRC. Ico came up with a list of a few more
   2095 > (localized) messages. I suggested the most pragmatic solution: keeping
   2096 > this list around with a comment to send patches if anybody stumbles
   2097 > upon a new localized version of it.
   2098 
   2099 Yes, that's probably the most pragmatic way to go. It's a shame that MUA
   2100 type A is forced to keep a list of possible ramblings of MUA type B to
   2101 do it's work, but that's the way it is.
   2102 
   2103 -- 
   2104 :wq
   2105 ^X^Cy^K^X^C^C^C^C
   2106 
   2107 From support@plecavalier.com  Sat Jan 29 10:20:38 2011
   2108 From: support@plecavalier.com (Philippe LeCavalier)
   2109 Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:20:38 -0600
   2110 Subject: [sup-talk] illegible encoding when exiting vim
   2111 Message-ID: <20110129092038.6798sdxsmc04oko8@webmail.plecavalier.com>
   2112 
   2113 Hi All.
   2114 
   2115 I'm new to Sup. I'm almost switched over from Evo -yes. drastic
   2116 change, I know- All but one issues remains. When I exit vim and return
   2117 to the compose-mode window, hundreds of lines of illegible encoding is
   2118 added to the bottom of the msg. I imagine I'm not the firs to
   2119 encounter this. My first guess was the encoding support but adding
   2120 ncursesw didn't do anything other than suppress the warning of the
   2121 missing gem in the log buffer.
   2122 
   2123 My relevant system info is here[1]. If I forgot anything please ask.
   2124 Thanks in advance for any guidance.
   2125 
   2126 [1] http://paste.debian.net/106026/
   2127 
   2128 Cheers,
   2129 Phil
   2130 
   2131 
   2132 From marc.hartstein@alum.vassar.edu  Sat Jan 29 12:31:07 2011
   2133 From: marc.hartstein@alum.vassar.edu (Marc Hartstein)
   2134 Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:31:07 -0500
   2135 Subject: [sup-talk] crypto-mode hook fragment to sign if from address can be
   2136 	signed
   2137 Message-ID: <1296322007-sup-3060@cabinet>
   2138 
   2139 I wrote this crypto-mode hook fragment so sup will default to Sign when
   2140 it has selected a from address for the outgoing email for which I have a
   2141 key which can sign emails. I have an occasionally used address for
   2142 outgoing mail which is not associated with my private key and which only
   2143 posts to a mailing list which complains about signed email anyway, so
   2144 this makes my life easier.
   2145 
   2146 Posted to share if anybody else finds it useful, and also to solicit
   2147 suggestions for improvements. It works as-is, but I'm neither a Ruby nor
   2148 GPG expert and wouldn't be surprised to learn there's a better way.
   2149 
   2150 ======================================================================
   2151 sign_addresses = `gpg -K`.grep(/<(.*)>/){$1}
   2152 crypto_selector.set_to :sign if not sign_addresses.select{|a| header["From"].include?(a) }.empty?
   2153 -------------- next part --------------
   2154 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
   2155 Name: signature.asc
   2156 Type: application/pgp-signature
   2157 Size: 198 bytes
   2158 Desc: not available
   2159 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20110129/86f50389/attachment.bin>
   2160 
   2161 From fedzor@gmail.com  Sat Jan 29 12:47:16 2011
   2162 From: fedzor@gmail.com (fedzor)
   2163 Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:47:16 -0500
   2164 Subject: [sup-talk]  Adding Sources
   2165 Message-ID: <9E351CF2-F2A4-4CDB-8E88-0AEEACF9BB8A@gmail.com>
   2166 
   2167 Hey,
   2168 
   2169 I got sup to work finally. It took me a while because xapian and xapian-full weren't playing well together. I feel like just dropping it for a couple months was really good because it feels like the two libraries took that time to work out their differences and come to an agreement.
   2170 
   2171 Now, it's time to add sources. But sup has changed since I last used it! I read my email from four IMAP boxes. In my experience, IMAP is incredibly shitty and servers bug out all the fucking time and they just kinda do whatever they want. According to the source code, William has a similar sentiment.
   2172 
   2173 Despite my frustrations with it, I was still surprised not to see an IMAP option for sup-config.
   2174 
   2175 What's the recommended way to read my IMAP mailboxes?
   2176 
   2177 Thanks,
   2178 Ari Brown
   2179 
   2180 From michael+sup@stapelberg.de  Sat Jan 29 13:16:57 2011
   2181 From: michael+sup@stapelberg.de (Michael Stapelberg)
   2182 Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:16:57 +0100
   2183 Subject: [sup-talk] Adding Sources
   2184 In-Reply-To: <9E351CF2-F2A4-4CDB-8E88-0AEEACF9BB8A@gmail.com>
   2185 References: <9E351CF2-F2A4-4CDB-8E88-0AEEACF9BB8A@gmail.com>
   2186 Message-ID: <1296324992-sup-8810@midna.zekjur.net>
   2187 
   2188 Hi fedzor,
   2189 
   2190 Excerpts from fedzor's message of 2011-01-29 18:47:16 +0100:
   2191 > What's the recommended way to read my IMAP mailboxes?
   2192 offlineimap
   2193 
   2194 Best regards,
   2195 Michael
   2196 
   2197 From support@plecavalier.com  Sat Jan 29 13:19:22 2011
   2198 From: support@plecavalier.com (Philippe LeCavalier)
   2199 Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:19:22 -0600
   2200 Subject: [sup-talk] Adding Sources
   2201 In-Reply-To: <1296324992-sup-8810@midna.zekjur.net>
   2202 References: <9E351CF2-F2A4-4CDB-8E88-0AEEACF9BB8A@gmail.com>
   2203 	<1296324992-sup-8810@midna.zekjur.net>
   2204 Message-ID: <20110129121922.wr0vgv5ggk448wgs@webmail.plecavalier.com>
   2205 
   2206 Quoting Michael Stapelberg <michael+sup at stapelberg.de>:
   2207 
   2208 > Hi fedzor,
   2209 >
   2210 > Excerpts from fedzor's message of 2011-01-29 18:47:16 +0100:
   2211 >> What's the recommended way to read my IMAP mailboxes?
   2212 > offlineimap
   2213 >
   2214 +1 there's no substitute.
   2215 Phil
   2216 
   2217 From tero@tilus.net  Sat Jan 29 13:45:54 2011
   2218 From: tero@tilus.net (Tero Tilus)
   2219 Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:45:54 +0200
   2220 Subject: [sup-talk] Adding Sources
   2221 In-Reply-To: <9E351CF2-F2A4-4CDB-8E88-0AEEACF9BB8A@gmail.com>
   2222 References: <9E351CF2-F2A4-4CDB-8E88-0AEEACF9BB8A@gmail.com>
   2223 Message-ID: <1296325142-sup-5672@tilus.net>
   2224 
   2225 fedzor, 2011-01-29 19:47:
   2226 > I got sup to work finally. It took me a while because xapian and
   2227 > xapian-full weren't playing well together.
   2228 
   2229 Afaik they aren't supposed to play _together_.  They provide the same
   2230 functionality (ruby bindings to xapian).  One (xapian) links against
   2231 system xapian lib and you need it (+ xapian devel stuff if packaged
   2232 separately) installed and the other (xapian-full) comes bundled with
   2233 (as the name suggests) full xapian and doesn't have external
   2234 dependencies with respect to it.
   2235 
   2236 > What's the recommended way to read my IMAP mailboxes?
   2237 
   2238 You use an offline synchronizer to pull mail from IMAP to local
   2239 Maildir storage.  See
   2240 
   2241   http://sup.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?TriggeringMailCollection
   2242 
   2243 -- 
   2244 Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/
   2245 
   2246 From tero@tilus.net  Sat Jan 29 13:50:54 2011
   2247 From: tero@tilus.net (Tero Tilus)
   2248 Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:50:54 +0200
   2249 Subject: [sup-talk] crypto-mode hook fragment to sign if from address
   2250 	can be signed
   2251 In-Reply-To: <1296322007-sup-3060@cabinet>
   2252 References: <1296322007-sup-3060@cabinet>
   2253 Message-ID: <1296326853-sup-891@tilus.net>
   2254 
   2255 Marc Hartstein, 2011-01-29 19:31:
   2256 > Posted to share if anybody else finds it useful
   2257 
   2258 Throw it up to wiki
   2259 
   2260   http://sup.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?GPG
   2261 
   2262 Looks like there are other crypto-mode hook fragments at the end of
   2263 the page already.
   2264 
   2265 -- 
   2266 Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/
   2267 
   2268 From tero@tilus.net  Sat Jan 29 14:00:48 2011
   2269 From: tero@tilus.net (Tero Tilus)
   2270 Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 21:00:48 +0200
   2271 Subject: [sup-talk] illegible encoding when exiting vim
   2272 In-Reply-To: <20110129092038.6798sdxsmc04oko8@webmail.plecavalier.com>
   2273 References: <20110129092038.6798sdxsmc04oko8@webmail.plecavalier.com>
   2274 Message-ID: <1296327468-sup-4848@tilus.net>
   2275 
   2276 Philippe LeCavalier, 2011-01-29 17:20:
   2277 > When I exit vim and return to the compose-mode window, hundreds of
   2278 > lines of illegible encoding is added to the bottom of the msg.
   2279 
   2280 Could you provide a screenshots (minimal mail in vim, compose-mode
   2281 after vim) demonstrating the behavior you described.
   2282 
   2283 > If I forgot anything please ask.
   2284 
   2285 $ ruby --version
   2286 
   2287 -- 
   2288 Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/
   2289 
   2290 From tero@tilus.net  Sat Jan 29 17:46:27 2011
   2291 From: tero@tilus.net (Tero Tilus)
   2292 Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:46:27 +0200
   2293 Subject: [sup-talk] illegible encoding when exiting vim
   2294 In-Reply-To: <20110129141920.nfxc8118ysss0840@webmail.plecavalier.com>
   2295 References: <20110129092038.6798sdxsmc04oko8@webmail.plecavalier.com>
   2296 	<1296327468-sup-4848@tilus.net>
   2297 	<20110129141920.nfxc8118ysss0840@webmail.plecavalier.com>
   2298 Message-ID: <1296340383-sup-5241@tilus.net>
   2299 
   2300 Philippe LeCavalier, 2011-01-29 22:19:
   2301 > See attached.
   2302 
   2303 Holy crap!  That's most likely a jpeg image right there.  At the top
   2304 you can see a snippet of XMP metadata.  After that there's app data
   2305 segment, which apparently contains embedded ICC profile.
   2306 
   2307 How did you do that?!  :-O
   2308 
   2309 You could do some more debugging.  Save the message in vim, check the
   2310 filename, but do not exit.  Go check the contents of the file using
   2311 another editor or a pager.  What do you see?
   2312 
   2313 If you re-enter vim from reply-mode, does the (supposedly raw jpeg
   2314 image) garbage appear in editor?
   2315 
   2316 -- 
   2317 Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/
   2318 
   2319 From dmishd@gmail.com  Sun Jan 30 18:04:58 2011
   2320 From: dmishd@gmail.com (Hamish)
   2321 Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:04:58 +0000
   2322 Subject: [sup-talk] gpg-options.rb: how to set always_trust
   2323 In-Reply-To: <1295820417-sup-1526@fly>
   2324 References: <1295770743-sup-9363@fly>
   2325 	<AANLkTimJZiRE31R5KJBdqZv5L17qhKeLjbO4fWM5LfD2@mail.gmail.com>
   2326 	<1295820417-sup-1526@fly>
   2327 Message-ID: <1296428275-sup-8599@whisper>
   2328 
   2329 Excerpts from Sebastian Lipp's message of Sun Jan 23 22:09:01 +0000 2011:
   2330 > Excerpts from Hamish D's message of So Jan 23 11:47:32 +0100 2011:
   2331 > > if operation == "encrypt"
   2332 > >   options.merge({:always_trust => true})
   2333 > > end
   2334 > > options
   2335 > 
   2336 > That is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks.
   2337 
   2338 I've discovered that it actually needs to be  
   2339 
   2340 if operation == "encrypt"
   2341   options.merge!({:always_trust => true})
   2342 end
   2343 options
   2344 
   2345 I've updated the wiki aswell. The difference is using merge! rather than
   2346 merge - I discovered this while tracking down your other issue:
   2347 
   2348 > But another problem popped up. Now I can't sign any message. It makes no
   2349 > difference if gpg-options.rb is there or not. There is also no difference in
   2350 > choosing sign or sign and encrypt. There are no messages about that in
   2351 > the log even with debugging turned on. Have I found a bug?
   2352 
   2353 This bug is now fixed in the next branch (and the gpgme branch). Someone
   2354 should hopefully merge this into master soon.
   2355 
   2356 http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-devel/2011-January/000965.html
   2357 
   2358 Hamish Downer
   2359 
   2360 From dmishd@gmail.com  Sun Jan 30 18:07:02 2011
   2361 From: dmishd@gmail.com (Hamish D)
   2362 Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:07:02 +0000
   2363 Subject: [sup-talk] problem starting sup
   2364 In-Reply-To: <1296093042-sup-322@masanjin.net>
   2365 References: <AANLkTi=ZX0cT-fiT7DeETx7wbO77wZeLJk86_zhbkqGF@mail.gmail.com>
   2366 	<1296093042-sup-322@masanjin.net>
   2367 Message-ID: <AANLkTi=eZojPJvMB4=AqWPm_MhyvhCoa5Qfq3bNCm+rm@mail.gmail.com>
   2368 
   2369 > Initting the hookmanager happens very early on in Sup, so I'm guessing
   2370 > there's something wrong with your config file or the log file (the only
   2371 > two things that happen before the hookmanager is brought up).
   2372 
   2373 I moved .sup out of the way and the error went away. Then with playing
   2374 with it I managed to delete the .sup directory that caused the errors
   2375 :/ If I ever happen to reproduce this I'll know what to do anyway.
   2376 
   2377 Hamish
   2378