community/pipermail-archives/sup-talk/2010-09.txt (45272B) - raw
1 From groups@hjdivad.com Wed Sep 1 14:55:26 2010
2 From: groups@hjdivad.com (David J. Hamilton)
3 Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:55:26 -0700
4 Subject: [sup-talk] Trying sup with gmail
5 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinnoyGXjYTxC0bpuZR=fajBH-m+8HsXEVPxgx9p@mail.gmail.com>
6 References: <AANLkTinnoyGXjYTxC0bpuZR=fajBH-m+8HsXEVPxgx9p@mail.gmail.com>
7 Message-ID: <AANLkTi=y0MfutXkShjF6mqVVNvVwZ5yHZO=qnYd-7peX@mail.gmail.com>
8
9 Hello,
10
11 I am trying to use sup for the first time and am having some
12 difficulties. ?I currently use gmail, so I am trying to add it as a
13 source. ?The new user guide[1] states that I could use either
14 sup-config or sup-add to add an IMAP source, which is what I have
15 tried. ? Unfortunately, sup-add refuses to recognize imap[s].
16
17 ? ?[davidjh at nyx (master; ruby-1.8.7-p302)] ~
18 ? ?$ sup --version
19 ? ?sup v0.11
20
21 ? ?[davidjh at nyx (master; ruby-1.8.7-p302)] ~
22 ? ?$ sup-add --help
23 ? ?Adds a source to the Sup source list.
24
25 ? ?Usage:
26 ? ? ?sup-add [options] <source uri>+
27
28 ? ?where <source uri>+ is one or more source URIs.
29
30 ? ?For mbox files on local disk, use the form:
31 ? ? ? ?mbox:<path to mbox file>, or
32 ? ? ? ?mbox://<path to mbox file>
33
34 ? ?For Maildir folders, use the form:
35 ? ? ? ?maildir:<path to Maildir directory>; or
36 ? ? ? ?maildir://<path to Maildir directory>
37
38 ? ?Options are:
39 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?--archive, -a: ? Automatically archive all new
40 messages from these sources.
41 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?--unusual, -u: ? Do not automatically poll these
42 sources for new messages.
43 ? ? ? ? ? ? --labels, -l <s>: ? A comma-separated set of labels to
44 apply to all messages from this source
45 ? ? ? ? ? ? ?--force-new, -f: ? Create a new account for this source,
46 even if one already exists.
47 ? ? ?--force-account, -o <s>: ? Reuse previously defined account user at hostname.
48 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?--version, -v: ? Print version and exit
49 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? --help, -h: ? Show this message
50
51 ? ?[davidjh at nyx (master; ruby-1.8.7-p302)] ~
52 ? ?$ sup-add imaps://imap.google.com
53 ? ?Error: Unknown source type "imaps".
54 ? ?Try --help for help.
55 ? ?[Wed Sep 01 11:36:48 -0700 2010] Flushing Xapian updates to disk.
56 This may take a while...
57
58 ? ?[davidjh at nyx (master; ruby-1.8.7-p302)] ~
59 ? ?$ sup-add imap://imap.google.com
60 ? ?Error: Unknown source type "imap".
61 ? ?Try --help for help.
62 ? ?[Wed Sep 01 11:36:51 -0700 2010] Flushing Xapian updates to disk.
63 This may take a while...
64
65
66 Checking the source, it seems adding imap sources was removed around
67 February, in commit 5bb1b3a29bc434c006ce0f4886059de3fa0d9801. ?There
68 is a brief note about using offlineimap, but not much more.
69
70
71 Is it possible to add gmail as a source in the current version of sup,
72 and if so what is the recommended way of doing this? ?I am quite happy
73 to RTFM if somebody could kindly point me towards the FM I must R. ?It
74 is fine if the answer is IMAP is basically not supported, but if I
75 read up on offlineimap I can find a way to get a non-imap (mbox,
76 maildir?) interface, but at the moment it feels as if I am just going
77 in the wrong direction.
78
79 [1] http://sup.rubyforge.org/NewUserGuide.txt
80
81 --
82 med v?nlig h?lsning
83 David J. Hamilton
84
85 From marka@pobox.com Wed Sep 1 15:58:42 2010
86 From: marka@pobox.com (Mark Alexander)
87 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:58:42 -0400
88 Subject: [sup-talk] Trying sup with gmail
89 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=y0MfutXkShjF6mqVVNvVwZ5yHZO=qnYd-7peX@mail.gmail.com>
90 References: <AANLkTinnoyGXjYTxC0bpuZR=fajBH-m+8HsXEVPxgx9p@mail.gmail.com>
91 <AANLkTi=y0MfutXkShjF6mqVVNvVwZ5yHZO=qnYd-7peX@mail.gmail.com>
92 Message-ID: <1283370560-sup-9418@x41>
93
94 Excerpts from David J. Hamilton's message of Wed Sep 01 14:55:26 -0400 2010:
95 > Is it possible to add gmail as a source in the current version of sup,
96 > and if so what is the recommended way of doing this? ?I am quite happy
97 > to RTFM if somebody could kindly point me towards the FM I must R. ?It
98 > is fine if the answer is IMAP is basically not supported, but if I
99 > read up on offlineimap I can find a way to get a non-imap (mbox,
100 > maildir?) interface, but at the moment it feels as if I am just going
101 > in the wrong direction.
102
103 My understanding is that IMAP is not supported any more by sup (I've
104 never used IMAP sources, so I could be wrong about this).
105
106 I use both Gmail and MS Exchange with sup, using fetchmail and
107 maildrop to fetch the mail and store it locally. (I use msmtp to
108 send mail.)
109
110 I tried offlineimap for a while. I know it's popular, but I abandoned
111 it because I was having problems with messages being moved from one
112 maildir to another. I was definitely having this problem with
113 Exchange, and it seemed to be related to deleted messages. I can't
114 remember if I was having this problem with Gmail; probably not.
115
116 In any case, fetchmail and maildrop seem very solid. They don't give
117 you the ability to sync changes back to the IMAP server, but I never
118 needed that feature, and my understanding is that sup doesn't quite
119 support that yet anyway (or maybe it's experimental?).
120
121 From michael+sup@stapelberg.de Wed Sep 1 16:11:06 2010
122 From: michael+sup@stapelberg.de (Michael Stapelberg)
123 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:11:06 +0200
124 Subject: [sup-talk] Trying sup with gmail
125 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=y0MfutXkShjF6mqVVNvVwZ5yHZO=qnYd-7peX@mail.gmail.com>
126 References: <AANLkTinnoyGXjYTxC0bpuZR=fajBH-m+8HsXEVPxgx9p@mail.gmail.com>
127 <AANLkTi=y0MfutXkShjF6mqVVNvVwZ5yHZO=qnYd-7peX@mail.gmail.com>
128 Message-ID: <1283371814-sup-3556@midna.zekjur.net>
129
130 Hi David,
131
132 Excerpts from David J. Hamilton's message of 2010-09-01 20:55:26 +0200:
133 > Is it possible to add gmail as a source in the current version of sup,
134 > and if so what is the recommended way of doing this? ?I am quite happy
135 You can have a look at http://anirudhsanjeev.org/temp/supsite/ which explains
136 how to set up sup with gmail.
137
138 Best regards,
139 Michael
140
141 From dlordxorso@yahoo.com Fri Sep 3 09:13:40 2010
142 From: dlordxorso@yahoo.com (Daren Lord)
143 Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 06:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
144 Subject: [sup-talk] Arch Linux sup now failing.
145 Message-ID: <747172.93895.qm@web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
146
147 There must have been an arch package update that is now causing my sup mail to
148 fail with this error.
149
150 /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:762:in `report_activate_error': Could not find
151 RubyGem ncurses (>= 0) (Gem::LoadError)
152 from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:219:in `activate'
153 from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:254:in `block in activate'
154 from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:253:in `each'
155 from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:253:in `activate'
156 from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:1065:in `gem'
157 from /usr/bin/sup:18:in `<main>'
158
159 I have both ncurses and ncursesw installed through the aur branch.
160
161 Any ideas? Use this at work so I am down right now.
162
163 aur/ruby-ncurses 1.2.4-1 [installed] (17)
164 This ruby extension makes most functions, constants, and external variables
165 of the C library ncurses accessible
166
167 from the Ruby programming language.
168 aur/ruby-ncursesw 1.2.4.1-2 [installed] (17)
169 Ruby wrapper for ncurses providing wide character support.
170
171 Thanks,
172
173 dalord
174
175
176
177 -------------- next part --------------
178 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
179 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20100903/afe2d87c/attachment.html>
180
181 From piotr.kempa@sigarden.com Fri Sep 3 09:33:07 2010
182 From: piotr.kempa@sigarden.com (Piotr Kempa)
183 Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:33:07 +0200
184 Subject: [sup-talk] Arch Linux sup now failing.
185 In-Reply-To: <747172.93895.qm@web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
186 References: <747172.93895.qm@web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
187 Message-ID: <1283520512-sup-6361@pk-desktop>
188
189 Excerpts from Daren Lord's message of 2010-09-03 15:13:40 +0200:
190 > There must have been an arch package update that is now causing my sup mail to
191 > fail with this error.
192 >
193 > /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:762:in `report_activate_error': Could not find
194 > RubyGem ncurses (>= 0) (Gem::LoadError)
195 > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:219:in `activate'
196 > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:254:in `block in activate'
197 > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:253:in `each'
198 > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:253:in `activate'
199 > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:1065:in `gem'
200 > from /usr/bin/sup:18:in `<main>'
201 >
202 > I have both ncurses and ncursesw installed through the aur branch.
203 >
204 > Any ideas? Use this at work so I am down right now.
205 >
206 > aur/ruby-ncurses 1.2.4-1 [installed] (17)
207 > This ruby extension makes most functions, constants, and external variables
208 > of the C library ncurses accessible
209 >
210 > from the Ruby programming language.
211 > aur/ruby-ncursesw 1.2.4.1-2 [installed] (17)
212 > Ruby wrapper for ncurses providing wide character support.
213 >
214 > Thanks,
215 >
216 > dalord
217 >
218
219 Hi, I just had the same thing this morning. I reinstalled sup from aur
220 (there's been a new package version, upgraded me from 0.11-1 to 0.11-2)
221 and just in case backed ruby (upgraded recently to 1.9.2) to 1.9.1. I'm
222 not sure the latter was necessary but I'm up and running again. I'm
223 using this at work too so I have no time to experiment with upgrading
224 ruby, but I'll try when I get a chance (especially if somebody here can
225 confirm sup works with ruby 1.9.2 on their box).
226
227 The new package release -2 depends on ruby-ncursesw instead of
228 ruby-ncurses the -1 depended on - this might have something to do with
229 the whole error (but it's just a guess).
230
231 Try respawning sup from aur and if this doesn't help, downgrade ruby to
232 1.9.1.
233
234 Good luck!
235 Piotr
236
237 From arian.kuschki@googlemail.com Fri Sep 3 11:26:22 2010
238 From: arian.kuschki@googlemail.com (Arian Kuschki)
239 Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 17:26:22 +0200
240 Subject: [sup-talk] Arch Linux sup now failing.
241 In-Reply-To: <747172.93895.qm@web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
242 References: <747172.93895.qm@web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
243 Message-ID: <AANLkTi=3UQX4ULet==e+my5rWuvCLLCqACKa5CgJ9n6d@mail.gmail.com>
244
245 same thing happened to me on Arch Linux a couple of days ago after the
246 upgrade to ruby 1.9.2. p0 (or similar, can't check right now). downgrading
247 to 1.9.1 didn't help. I would also be happy if somebody could help.
248
249 On 3 September 2010 15:13, Daren Lord <dlordxorso at yahoo.com> wrote:
250
251 > There must have been an arch package update that is now causing my sup mail
252 > to fail with this error.
253 >
254 > /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:762:in `report_activate_error': Could not
255 > find RubyGem ncurses (>= 0) (Gem::LoadError)
256 > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:219:in `activate'
257 > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:254:in `block in activate'
258 > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:253:in `each'
259 > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:253:in `activate'
260 > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:1065:in `gem'
261 > from /usr/bin/sup:18:in `<main>'
262 >
263 > I have both ncurses and ncursesw installed through the aur branch.
264 >
265 > Any ideas? Use this at work so I am down right now.
266 >
267 > aur/ruby-ncurses 1.2.4-1 [installed] (17)
268 > This ruby extension makes most functions, constants, and external
269 > variables of the C library ncurses accessible
270 > from the Ruby programming language.
271 > aur/ruby-ncursesw 1.2.4.1-2 [installed] (17)
272 > Ruby wrapper for ncurses providing wide character support.
273 >
274 > Thanks,
275 >
276 > dalord
277 >
278 >
279 >
280 > _______________________________________________
281 > sup-talk mailing list
282 > sup-talk at rubyforge.org
283 > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
284 >
285 >
286 -------------- next part --------------
287 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
288 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20100903/1615262a/attachment.html>
289
290 From hollunder@lavabit.com Fri Sep 3 13:57:38 2010
291 From: hollunder@lavabit.com (hollunder at lavabit.com)
292 Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:57:38 -0400 (EDT)
293 Subject: [sup-talk] Arch Linux sup now failing.
294 In-Reply-To: <1283520512-sup-6361@pk-desktop>
295 References: <747172.93895.qm@web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
296 <1283520512-sup-6361@pk-desktop>
297 Message-ID: <1438.143.205.216.185.1283536658.squirrel@lavabit.com>
298
299 > Excerpts from Daren Lord's message of 2010-09-03 15:13:40 +0200:
300 >> There must have been an arch package update that is now causing my sup
301 >> mail to
302 >> fail with this error.
303 >>
304 >> /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:762:in `report_activate_error': Could
305 >> not find
306 >> RubyGem ncurses (>= 0) (Gem::LoadError)
307 >> from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:219:in `activate'
308 >> from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:254:in `block in activate'
309 >> from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:253:in `each'
310 >> from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:253:in `activate'
311 >> from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:1065:in `gem'
312 >> from /usr/bin/sup:18:in `<main>'
313 >>
314 >> I have both ncurses and ncursesw installed through the aur branch.
315 >>
316 >> Any ideas? Use this at work so I am down right now.
317 >>
318 >> aur/ruby-ncurses 1.2.4-1 [installed] (17)
319 >> This ruby extension makes most functions, constants, and external
320 >> variables
321 >> of the C library ncurses accessible
322 >>
323 >> from the Ruby programming language.
324 >> aur/ruby-ncursesw 1.2.4.1-2 [installed] (17)
325 >> Ruby wrapper for ncurses providing wide character support.
326 >>
327 >> Thanks,
328 >>
329 >> dalord
330 >>
331 >
332 > Hi, I just had the same thing this morning. I reinstalled sup from aur
333 > (there's been a new package version, upgraded me from 0.11-1 to 0.11-2)
334 > and just in case backed ruby (upgraded recently to 1.9.2) to 1.9.1. I'm
335 > not sure the latter was necessary but I'm up and running again. I'm
336 > using this at work too so I have no time to experiment with upgrading
337 > ruby, but I'll try when I get a chance (especially if somebody here can
338 > confirm sup works with ruby 1.9.2 on their box).
339 >
340 > The new package release -2 depends on ruby-ncursesw instead of
341 > ruby-ncurses the -1 depended on - this might have something to do with
342 > the whole error (but it's just a guess).
343 >
344 > Try respawning sup from aur and if this doesn't help, downgrade ruby to
345 > 1.9.1.
346 >
347 > Good luck!
348 > Piotr
349
350 The situation looks grim. I don't seem to have the 1.9.1 package anymore
351 due to a recent cache cleaning. Read all the things I tried:
352 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26439
353
354 How can a stupid minor version change break things so badly? And no one
355 knows what's wrong or how to solve this mess? I'm kinda pissed.
356
357 Maybe we can get sup into community, so it's kinda supported and might get
358 some testing that would catch this kind of breakage before it hits users.
359
360
361
362 From eg@gaute.vetsj.com Fri Sep 3 14:13:42 2010
363 From: eg@gaute.vetsj.com (Gaute Hope)
364 Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:13:42 +0200
365 Subject: [sup-talk] Arch Linux sup now failing.
366 In-Reply-To: <1438.143.205.216.185.1283536658.squirrel@lavabit.com>
367 References: <747172.93895.qm@web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
368 <1283520512-sup-6361@pk-desktop>
369 <1438.143.205.216.185.1283536658.squirrel@lavabit.com>
370 Message-ID: <AANLkTimujj1BxAj8knRra1qWCxe-aUKiZNoGQ8msrnvt@mail.gmail.com>
371
372 Hey,
373
374 ran into the same problem. The first problem I ran into was related to
375 ncursesw using STR2CSTR () and not StringValuePtr, this has been
376 obsolete for a while, but was apparently removed in 1.9.2. I got
377 ncurses to work; see attached PKGBUILD with patch. But there were some
378 problems with the tmpfile stuff, sup would start (complain about
379 ncurses not being ncursesw, which i don't think is correct because i
380 didn't seem to have problems with wide chars.. but well well, probably
381 just a matter of names). But when creating a new message it would
382 fail.
383
384 So I gave up :p and downgraded to 1.9.1-p378 from arch, I jumped a few
385 revisions back in Arch'es ABS (PKGBUILD's), I'll attach the PKGBUILD
386 here for you, but you could grab it yourself from ArchLinux's
387 repository. Still rebuilding some gems so haven't been able to test if
388 something else is the cause yet.. but this should work.
389
390 To be able to build the old ruby I first had to delete the 1.9.2
391 ruby.. (otherwise the build will segfault). I just removed it with
392 pacman -Ud ruby ( or actually yaourt.. but..)
393
394 The attached files should be put in their own folder and you can
395 create the packages with makepkg, and install the resulting *.pkg..*
396 with pacman -U filename.
397
398 - gaute
399
400 On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:57 PM, <hollunder at lavabit.com> wrote:
401 >> Excerpts from Daren Lord's message of 2010-09-03 15:13:40 +0200:
402 >>> There must have been an arch package update that is now causing my sup
403 >>> mail to
404 >>> fail with this error.
405 >>>
406 >>> /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:762:in `report_activate_error': Could
407 >>> not find
408 >>> RubyGem ncurses (>= 0) (Gem::LoadError)
409 >>> ? ? from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:219:in `activate'
410 >>> ? ? from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:254:in `block in activate'
411 >>> ? ? from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:253:in `each'
412 >>> ? ? from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:253:in `activate'
413 >>> ? ? from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:1065:in `gem'
414 >>> ? ? from /usr/bin/sup:18:in `<main>'
415 >>>
416 >>> I have both ncurses and ncursesw installed through the aur branch.
417 >>>
418 >>> Any ideas? Use this at work so I am down right now.
419 >>>
420 >>> aur/ruby-ncurses 1.2.4-1 [installed] (17)
421 >>> ? ? This ruby extension makes most functions, constants, and external
422 >>> variables
423 >>> of the C library ncurses accessible
424 >>>
425 >>> ? ? from the Ruby programming language.
426 >>> aur/ruby-ncursesw 1.2.4.1-2 [installed] (17)
427 >>> ? ? Ruby wrapper for ncurses providing wide character support.
428 >>>
429 >>> Thanks,
430 >>>
431 >>> dalord
432 >>>
433 >>
434 >> Hi, I just had the same thing this morning. I reinstalled sup from aur
435 >> (there's been a new package version, upgraded me from 0.11-1 to 0.11-2)
436 >> and just in case backed ruby (upgraded recently to 1.9.2) to 1.9.1. I'm
437 >> not sure the latter was necessary but I'm up and running again. I'm
438 >> using this at work too so I have no time to experiment with upgrading
439 >> ruby, but I'll try when I get a chance (especially if somebody here can
440 >> confirm sup works with ruby 1.9.2 on their box).
441 >>
442 >> The new package release -2 depends on ruby-ncursesw instead of
443 >> ruby-ncurses the -1 depended on - this might have something to do with
444 >> the whole error (but it's just a guess).
445 >>
446 >> Try respawning sup from aur and if this doesn't help, downgrade ruby to
447 >> 1.9.1.
448 >>
449 >> Good luck!
450 >> Piotr
451 >
452 > The situation looks grim. I don't seem to have the 1.9.1 package anymore
453 > due to a recent cache cleaning. Read all the things I tried:
454 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26439
455 >
456 > How can a stupid minor version change break things so badly? And no one
457 > knows what's wrong or how to solve this mess? I'm kinda pissed.
458 >
459 > Maybe we can get sup into community, so it's kinda supported and might get
460 > some testing that would catch this kind of breakage before it hits users.
461 >
462 >
463 > _______________________________________________
464 > sup-talk mailing list
465 > sup-talk at rubyforge.org
466 > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
467 >
468 -------------- next part --------------
469 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
470 Name: ruby-ncursesw-fixed-stringvalueptr.tar.xz
471 Type: application/x-xz
472 Size: 3112 bytes
473 Desc: not available
474 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20100903/f23a8ea3/attachment.bin>
475 -------------- next part --------------
476 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
477 Name: ruby-1.9.1p378.pkgbuild.tar.xz
478 Type: application/x-xz
479 Size: 2372 bytes
480 Desc: not available
481 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20100903/f23a8ea3/attachment-0001.bin>
482
483 From eg@gaute.vetsj.com Fri Sep 3 14:25:04 2010
484 From: eg@gaute.vetsj.com (Gaute Hope)
485 Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:25:04 +0200
486 Subject: [sup-talk] Arch Linux sup now failing.
487 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimujj1BxAj8knRra1qWCxe-aUKiZNoGQ8msrnvt@mail.gmail.com>
488 References: <747172.93895.qm@web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
489 <1283520512-sup-6361@pk-desktop>
490 <1438.143.205.216.185.1283536658.squirrel@lavabit.com>
491 <AANLkTimujj1BxAj8knRra1qWCxe-aUKiZNoGQ8msrnvt@mail.gmail.com>
492 Message-ID: <1283537988-sup-5681@dolk>
493
494 Excerpts from Gaute Hope's message of 2010-09-03 20:13:42 +0200:
495 > So I gave up :p and downgraded to 1.9.1-p378 from arch, I jumped a few
496 > revisions back in Arch'es ABS (PKGBUILD's), I'll attach the PKGBUILD
497 > here for you, but you could grab it yourself from ArchLinux's
498 > repository. Still rebuilding some gems so haven't been able to test if
499 > something else is the cause yet.. but this should work.
500
501 Yeah, that worked. Writing this from sup. In cases the attachements
502 don't appear at the mailing list the updated ruby-ncurses PKGBUILD is
503 located here: http://github.com/gauteh/arch/tree/master/ruby-ncursesw/
504
505 (don't use it thou, it might be helpful for anyone who want to get sup
506 to work on 1.9.2)
507
508 You can find the old PKGBUILDS for ruby here:
509 p378:
510 http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/ruby/trunk/?rev=75260&peg=75260
511
512 but p429 should probably also work:
513 http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/ruby/trunk/?rev=84971&peg=84971
514
515 checkout the wiki or manpage on how to use 'makepkg'.
516
517 - gaute
518
519
520 From _@whats-your.name Fri Sep 3 19:01:55 2010
521 From: _@whats-your.name (carmen)
522 Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:01:55 +0000
523 Subject: [sup-talk] Arch Linux sup now failing.
524 In-Reply-To: <1438.143.205.216.185.1283536658.squirrel@lavabit.com>
525 References: <1438.143.205.216.185.1283536658.squirrel@lavabit.com>
526 Message-ID: <20100903230155.GA4001@myhost.Belkin>
527
528 > How can a stupid minor version change break things so badly?
529 Arch totally hosed 1.9.2 here too. way beyond sup, into justnuking Gem-installed lib functionality in general
530
531 actually, ive never used sup beacuse it refuses to find my mail (notmuch has no issues) because its not in {cur,new,tmp} subdirs. nor does it seem to recursively dig. but i spent a while and there was just too much code to read, so i wrote my own webmail [ http://gitorious.org/element/element/blobs/master/ruby/W/mail.rb ]
532
533 well, TMail is totally broken on 1.9.2, and RMail (as sup uses) and Mail (from TMail's maintainer and now abandoner) is simply way too slow as theyre pure-ruby
534
535 unless you install activeSupport 2.3.x which has a hacked tmail that runson 1.9.x
536
537 anyways.. i'm trying to figure out a good permanent solution to this, and it seems to involve rewriting eveyrthing in HAskell..
538
539 From hollunder@lavabit.com Sat Sep 4 05:05:07 2010
540 From: hollunder@lavabit.com (=?utf-8?q?Philipp_=C3=9Cberbacher?=)
541 Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:05:07 +0200
542 Subject: [sup-talk] Arch Linux sup now failing.
543 In-Reply-To: <20100903230155.GA4001@myhost.Belkin>
544 References: <1438.143.205.216.185.1283536658.squirrel@lavabit.com>
545 <20100903230155.GA4001@myhost.Belkin>
546 Message-ID: <1283590730-sup-9050@eris>
547
548 Excerpts from carmen's message of 2010-09-04 01:01:55 +0200:
549 > > How can a stupid minor version change break things so badly?
550 > Arch totally hosed 1.9.2 here too. way beyond sup, into justnuking Gem-installed lib functionality in general
551
552 Ok, good to know that other stuff is broken too, so it's not entirely
553 sups fault and the Arch devs need to look into this. I filed a bug
554 report (with a somewhat bad title) sometime yesterday:
555 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20733
556
557 > actually, ive never used sup beacuse it refuses to find my mail (notmuch has no issues) because its not in {cur,new,tmp} subdirs. nor does it seem to recursively dig. but i spent a while and there was just too much code to read, so i wrote my own webmail [ http://gitorious.org/element/element/blobs/master/ruby/W/mail.rb ]
558
559 Hmm, not sure what issue you ran into there. The way it works for me:
560 everything lands in the inbox at the mail provider, offlineimap pulls it
561 to my machine, sup indexes it, done.
562
563 > well, TMail is totally broken on 1.9.2, and RMail (as sup uses) and Mail (from TMail's maintainer and now abandoner) is simply way too slow as theyre pure-ruby
564 >
565 > unless you install activeSupport 2.3.x which has a hacked tmail that runson 1.9.x
566 >
567 > anyways.. i'm trying to figure out a good permanent solution to this, and it seems to involve rewriting eveyrthing in HAskell..
568
569 Nah, the solution is to rewrite everything in lua :)
570 --
571 Philipp
572
573 --
574 "Wir stehen selbst entt?uscht und sehn betroffen / Den Vorhang zu
575 und alle Fragen offen." Bertolt Brecht, Der gute Mensch von Sezuan
576
577
578 From aidecoe@aidecoe.name Tue Sep 7 05:53:01 2010
579 From: aidecoe@aidecoe.name (=?utf-8?q?Amadeusz_=C5=BBo=C5=82nowski?=)
580 Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:53:01 +0200
581 Subject: [sup-talk] sent mail labeling
582 Message-ID: <1283852052-sup-722@aemeni>
583
584 Hi,
585
586 How sent messages are handled? What I've observed is that only threads
587 I've started are labeled as 'sent' and not separate messages I've sent
588 as a reply to someone's e-mail.
589
590 I've also noticed some strange behaviour. Sup labels some messages that
591 I haven't sent/replied in any way as 'sent'. An example is thread on
592 sup-talk list: "[sup-talk] Arch Linux sup now failing.", which Sup
593 labeled as 'sent'. Should I report it? What should I include? I'm
594 using common maildir for outbox and inbox (does that matter?) and don't
595 mangle with any other programs than Fetchmail and Sup.
596
597 As a workaround would be nice to have possibility to add/remove 'sent'
598 label manually. Is it already possible? Does it make sense to request
599 this feature?
600
601
602 Cheers,
603 --
604 Amadeusz ?o?nowski
605 aka aidecoe
606 PGP key: C284750D / encrypt&sign, please
607 -------------- next part --------------
608 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
609 Name: signature.asc
610 Type: application/pgp-signature
611 Size: 198 bytes
612 Desc: not available
613 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20100907/ecbbc3ff/attachment.bin>
614
615 From ezyang@MIT.EDU Thu Sep 9 12:56:11 2010
616 From: ezyang@MIT.EDU (Edward Z. Yang)
617 Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:56:11 -0400
618 Subject: [sup-talk] Behavior for sent messages
619 In-Reply-To: <1281916596-sup-8793@ezyang>
620 References: <1280546878-sup-5384@ezyang>
621 <1280575476-sup-2567@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
622 <1280628309-sup-7092@ezyang>
623 <1280628833-sup-7698@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
624 <1281916596-sup-8793@ezyang>
625 Message-ID: <1284051347-sup-9359@ezyang>
626
627 Excerpts from Edward Z. Yang's message of Sun Aug 15 19:58:03 -0400 2010:
628 > I've tracked down the regression to this merge: 45c3433c0 Merge remote branch 'origin/maildir'
629 >
630 > I'd appreciate a quick san-check before I start investigating the merge more
631 > closely: you can easily test for this bug by renaming your .sup directory away
632 > and creating a fresh sup directory.
633
634 Hello,
635
636 Has anyone been able to reproduce this bug on the relevant commit?
637
638 Edward
639
640 From badalex@gmail.com Thu Sep 9 13:24:21 2010
641 From: badalex@gmail.com (Alex Hunsaker)
642 Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:24:21 -0600
643 Subject: [sup-talk] sup with ruby 1.9.2 patches (was: Arch Linux sup now
644 failing.)
645 Message-ID: <AANLkTi=EKfpn6wT_eb-8kNDKUB4cDrZ0WqyAJR6yDPuo@mail.gmail.com>
646
647 Here are the 2 patches Im using to get sup to work with ruby 1.9.2
648
649 The first is against ncursesw and fixes the STR2CSTR issues.
650 The 2nd is against sup and fixes the tmpfile issue when trying to
651 reply/create a new message or viewing an attachment.
652
653 With both of these I dont have to run to mutt to send mail anymore :-)
654 -------------- next part --------------
655 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
656 Name: ncw.patch
657 Type: text/x-patch
658 Size: 14181 bytes
659 Desc: not available
660 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20100909/1f32b31d/attachment-0002.bin>
661 -------------- next part --------------
662 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
663 Name: sup_ruby192.patch
664 Type: text/x-patch
665 Size: 474 bytes
666 Desc: not available
667 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20100909/1f32b31d/attachment-0003.bin>
668
669 From danielgoldin@gmail.com Sat Sep 11 12:58:56 2010
670 From: danielgoldin@gmail.com (Daniel Goldin)
671 Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:58:56 -0700
672 Subject: [sup-talk] exception
673 Message-ID: <AANLkTinMOE8fopRLuX1M-5MWAUEGYL9CiUiRJMNxX_r5@mail.gmail.com>
674
675 I got an exception error when reading one of my labels. Any thoughts. I am
676 not a programmer, so keep it simple, if you will. Exception-log below:
677
678 d.
679
680 --- RuntimeError from thread: load threads for thread-index-mode
681 DocNotFoundError: Document 2275758200 not found.
682 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/index.rb:178:in `document'
683 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/index.rb:178:in
684 `each_message_in_thread_for'
685 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/index.rb:178:in `map'
686 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/index.rb:178:in
687 `each_message_in_thread_for'
688 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/thread.rb:341:in
689 `load_thread_for_message'
690 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/thread.rb:333:in
691 `load_n_threads'
692 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/index.rb:148:in
693 `each_id_by_date'
694 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/index.rb:239:in `each_id'
695 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/index.rb:239:in `each'
696 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/index.rb:239:in `each_id'
697 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/index.rb:148:in
698 `each_id_by_date'
699 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/thread.rb:328:in
700 `load_n_threads'
701 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/modes/thread-index-mode.rb:640:in
702 `__unprotected_load_n_threads'
703 (eval):12:in `load_n_threads'
704 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/modes/thread-index-mode.rb:624:in
705 `load_n_threads_background'
706 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup.rb:76:in `reporting_thread'
707 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup.rb:74:in `initialize'
708 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup.rb:74:in `new'
709 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup.rb:74:in `reporting_thread'
710 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/modes/thread-index-mode.rb:623:in
711 `load_n_threads_background'
712 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/modes/thread-index-mode.rb:694:in
713 `__unprotected_load_threads'
714 (eval):12:in `load_threads'
715 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/modes/label-search-results-mode.rb:33:in
716 `spawn_nicely'
717 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/modes/label-list-mode.rb:134:in
718 `select_label'
719 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/mode.rb:59:in `send'
720 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/mode.rb:59:in `handle_input'
721 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/buffer.rb:279:in `handle_input'
722 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/bin/sup:279
723 /usr/bin/sup:19:in `load'
724 /usr/bin/sup:19
725
726
727
728 --
729 Daniel Goldin
730 626.817.2462
731 -------------- next part --------------
732 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
733 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20100911/4d8e7588/attachment.html>
734
735 From dogsaw@thecyberplains.com Mon Sep 13 04:50:34 2010
736 From: dogsaw@thecyberplains.com (Matthew Goodall)
737 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:50:34 +1200
738 Subject: [sup-talk] Twitter
739 Message-ID: <1284356125-sup-5550@ethicsgradient.lan>
740
741 As a part an honest attempt at twitter, and my ongoing quest to put
742 everything into sup; I created a twitter client that stores into a
743 maildir and sends an email as a tweet.
744
745 I figure someone else might be interested:
746 http://github.com/downloads/lionicsheriff/rfc5322/rfc5322-0.4.0.gem
747
748 It provides two binaries: fetchtweet and sendtweet. I'd recommend
749 running 'fetchtweet --add-account accountname' first to create the
750 config file.
751
752 There are some examples of using (along with some sup hooks) at
753 http://github.com/lionicsheriff/rfc5322
754
755 From william.betts@gmail.com Mon Sep 13 12:02:06 2010
756 From: william.betts@gmail.com (William Betts)
757 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:02:06 -0700
758 Subject: [sup-talk] Twitter
759 In-Reply-To: <1284356125-sup-5550@ethicsgradient.lan>
760 References: <1284356125-sup-5550@ethicsgradient.lan>
761 Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Pgr8rpR03Kg5MYS9VvmoCK4h0g+pEy4Nyesqw@mail.gmail.com>
762
763 That's pretty cool. Thank you.
764
765 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Matthew Goodall
766 <dogsaw at thecyberplains.com>wrote:
767
768 > As a part an honest attempt at twitter, and my ongoing quest to put
769 > everything into sup; I created a twitter client that stores into a
770 > maildir and sends an email as a tweet.
771 >
772 > I figure someone else might be interested:
773 > http://github.com/downloads/lionicsheriff/rfc5322/rfc5322-0.4.0.gem
774 >
775 > It provides two binaries: fetchtweet and sendtweet. I'd recommend
776 > running 'fetchtweet --add-account accountname' first to create the
777 > config file.
778 >
779 > There are some examples of using (along with some sup hooks) at
780 > http://github.com/lionicsheriff/rfc5322
781 > _______________________________________________
782 > sup-talk mailing list
783 > sup-talk at rubyforge.org
784 > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
785 >
786 -------------- next part --------------
787 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
788 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20100913/cee128e3/attachment.html>
789
790 From lionel.grenier@gmail.com Sat Sep 18 01:31:28 2010
791 From: lionel.grenier@gmail.com (Lionel Grenier)
792 Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:31:28 +0200
793 Subject: [sup-talk] Error after Sup installation under Cygwin
794 Message-ID: <AANLkTimOVjjLqYWs0M-EcOtvKvPKyAggFWNyCTxv_YLd@mail.gmail.com>
795
796 Hello
797
798 I didn't find any post related to this so here it is:
799 - I've installed Sup in cygwin using gem (gem install sup).
800 - Installation went very well. no reported error all dependant components
801 (xapian, ncurses etc..) have been installed all together
802 - BUT when I run 'sup' I got the following error:
803 ---------------------------------------------
804 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/xapian-full-1.1.3.4/lib/_xapian.so: No such file
805 or
806 directory - /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/xapian-full-1.1.3.4/lib/_xapian.so
807 (Load
808 Error)
809 from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
810 `requi
811 re'
812 from
813 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/xapian-full-1.1.3.4/lib/xapian.rb:41
814 from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
815 `gem_o
816 riginal_require'
817 from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
818 `requi
819 re'
820 from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup/index.rb:3
821 from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
822 `gem_o
823 riginal_require'
824 from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
825 `requi
826 re'
827 from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/lib/sup.rb:316
828 from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
829 `gem_o
830 riginal_require'
831 from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
832 `requi
833 re'
834 from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sup-0.11/bin/sup:15
835 from /usr/bin/sup:19:in `load'
836 from /usr/bin/sup:19
837 ---------------------------------------------
838
839 Looking into the xapian library folder the file _xapian.so exists.
840 I googled this but didn't find solution, so maybe the sup community may have
841 the answer.
842
843 Thanks for your help
844
845 Lionel
846 -------------- next part --------------
847 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
848 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20100918/88c4fc3b/attachment.html>
849
850 From moritz+sup@wzff.de Tue Sep 21 13:32:14 2010
851 From: moritz+sup@wzff.de (Moritz Wilhelmy)
852 Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:32:14 +0200
853 Subject: [sup-talk] Quick start for newbies
854 Message-ID: <20100921173214.GA3808@barfooze.de>
855
856 The first message I wrote (using sup) did not arrive, it seems, so I send it
857 again with mutt and all the things that might rubyforge think I'm a spammer
858 censored.
859
860 -- forwarded message --
861 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8
862 Subject: Quick start for newbies
863 From: Moritz Wilhelmy <moritz+sup at wzff.de>
864 To: sup-talk <sup-talk at rubyforge.org>
865 Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:36:38 +0200
866 Message-Id: <1284974706-sup-6890 at niflheimr>
867 User-Agent: Sup/0.11
868 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
869
870 Hello all,
871
872 I've installed sup a few days ago and wanted to finally migrate to it
873 yesterday, so I started with migrating my MH folders to maildirs, since I've
874 been on nmh before and was hoping to become happy with sup. I was tempted to
875 try notmuch before, but I'm not an emacs user, and it lacks a sane curses
876 interface from what I know, so I decided to take a look at sup.
877
878 Then, I tried importing the messages, and I was wondering how to for instance,
879 import my sentbox and mark it as sent, and mark everything from my old mails as
880 read, since that's what I did with them. Importing with the label "Sent" on
881 the outbox didn't work, since apparently "Sent" (the Label) and "Sent" (the sup
882 internal whatever that's used for marking mails as sent) are not the same.
883
884 I also tried running sup-sync -a -e on my inbox, but apparently, the imported
885 mails are not marked as read either.
886
887 Now I'm wondering how to apply something (tag, mark as read, mark as spam) on a
888 number of messages which is the result of a search, for instance tag everything
889 with a subject containing VI**RA as spam, or tag everything from a particular
890 mailbox (outbox maildir) as sent.
891
892 I did read the readme and quickstart guide, but it doesn't say anything about
893 my kind of problem, although I figure it's very for new sup users.
894 Furthermore, I think manpages would be really handy, since that's where I look
895 first.
896
897 Also, is the archive to this list available as mbox file?
898
899 Sup seems overall nice, I like it that far. The tagging system is a good idea,
900 I figure.
901
902 Kind regards and thanks in advance,
903
904 Moritz
905
906 From stipredirect@gmail.com Wed Sep 22 14:18:30 2010
907 From: stipredirect@gmail.com (Michael Stipicevic)
908 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:18:30 -0400
909 Subject: [sup-talk] archive all messages before a certain date?
910 Message-ID: <AANLkTin8H1hWi6pmpGErBwey+kHefnUa2ZtS9+gbgyYz@mail.gmail.com>
911
912 I'm not sure if this is on the web anywhere (I've tried a few searches and
913 not much came up): what is the most straightforward way to archive all
914 messages before a certain date? I just loaded up a huge mail store and want
915 to archive everything before, say, March this year. I've tried various
916 combinations of chronic commands and the 'g' to tag threads but I'm not
917 getting anywhere. Also, sup seems built to *toggle* threads rather than
918 force them to a certain state (+inbox or -inbox). Any ideas?
919
920 Thanks,
921 - Mike
922 -------------- next part --------------
923 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
924 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20100922/a937a8b1/attachment.html>
925
926 From ezyang@MIT.EDU Wed Sep 22 14:35:20 2010
927 From: ezyang@MIT.EDU (Edward Z. Yang)
928 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:35:20 -0400
929 Subject: [sup-talk] archive all messages before a certain date?
930 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin8H1hWi6pmpGErBwey+kHefnUa2ZtS9+gbgyYz@mail.gmail.com>
931 References: <AANLkTin8H1hWi6pmpGErBwey+kHefnUa2ZtS9+gbgyYz@mail.gmail.com>
932 Message-ID: <1285180485-sup-7603@ezyang>
933
934 Excerpts from Michael Stipicevic's message of Wed Sep 22 14:18:30 -0400 2010:
935 > I'm not sure if this is on the web anywhere (I've tried a few searches and
936 > not much came up): what is the most straightforward way to archive all
937 > messages before a certain date? I just loaded up a huge mail store and want
938 > to archive everything before, say, March this year. I've tried various
939 > combinations of chronic commands and the 'g' to tag threads but I'm not
940 > getting anywhere. Also, sup seems built to *toggle* threads rather than
941 > force them to a certain state (+inbox or -inbox). Any ideas?
942
943 The best strategy I've found is to dump the inbox, do a manual search replace
944 on the appropriate range of the inbox tag, and then load it back up again.
945
946 Edward
947
948 From marka@pobox.com Wed Sep 22 14:50:32 2010
949 From: marka@pobox.com (Mark Alexander)
950 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:50:32 -0700
951 Subject: [sup-talk] archive all messages before a certain date?
952 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin8H1hWi6pmpGErBwey+kHefnUa2ZtS9+gbgyYz@mail.gmail.com>
953 References: <AANLkTin8H1hWi6pmpGErBwey+kHefnUa2ZtS9+gbgyYz@mail.gmail.com>
954 Message-ID: <1285181337-sup-1150@x41>
955
956 Excerpts from Michael Stipicevic's message of Wed Sep 22 11:18:30 -0700 2010:
957 > what is the most straightforward way to archive all
958 > messages before a certain date?
959
960 I believe that sup-tweak-labels is the thing you want to use.
961 It's been a long time since I tried it but I do recall
962 I was able to do what you're trying to do. Make sure
963 you use --dry-run first to make sure you don't wreck
964 things.
965
966
967 From stipredirect@gmail.com Wed Sep 22 14:53:47 2010
968 From: stipredirect@gmail.com (Michael Stipicevic)
969 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:53:47 -0400
970 Subject: [sup-talk] archive all messages before a certain date?
971 In-Reply-To: <1285181337-sup-1150@x41>
972 References: <AANLkTin8H1hWi6pmpGErBwey+kHefnUa2ZtS9+gbgyYz@mail.gmail.com>
973 <1285181337-sup-1150@x41>
974 Message-ID: <AANLkTimAoY8wSa9SxWcZMgG6R9wO_sN0xVLKZ6bAa=zn@mail.gmail.com>
975
976 On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Mark Alexander <marka at pobox.com> wrote:
977
978 > I believe that sup-tweak-labels is the thing you want to use.
979 > It's been a long time since I tried it but I do recall
980 > I was able to do what you're trying to do. Make sure
981 > you use --dry-run first to make sure you don't wreck
982 > things.
983 >
984
985 Thanks guys, I'll try this out.
986
987 - Mike
988 -------------- next part --------------
989 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
990 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20100922/96e0bfd4/attachment.html>
991
992 From dogsaw@thecyberplains.com Thu Sep 23 13:26:36 2010
993 From: dogsaw@thecyberplains.com (Matthew Goodall)
994 Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:26:36 +1200
995 Subject: [sup-talk] Twitter - new release
996 In-Reply-To: <1284356125-sup-5550@ethicsgradient.lan>
997 References: <1284356125-sup-5550@ethicsgradient.lan>
998 Message-ID: <1285262666-sup-1123@ethicsgradient.lan>
999
1000 I have released a new version:
1001 http://github.com/downloads/lionicsheriff/rfc5322/rfc5322-1.0.1.gem
1002
1003 Features:
1004 + attached images and videos are uploaded to yfrog & url is appended to
1005 tweet
1006 + long urls are automatically shortened
1007 + --pastebin option in sendtweet uploads unused parts of body to
1008 pastebin. Again urls are appended
1009 + long tweets are sent to tweetshrink.com before rejecting them
1010
1011 Documentation at: http://github.com/lionicsheriff/rfc5322
1012
1013 Note for upgraders:
1014 The config file has been renamed ~/.rfc5322.rc and a couple keys have
1015 been renamed:
1016 :oauth_token: -> :access_key:
1017 :oauth_token_secret: -> :access_secret:
1018
1019 I did a complete rewrite since the previous attempt reflected my recent
1020 stint in shell programming and would be very hard to maintain.
1021
1022 From lists@syshex.com Fri Sep 24 05:34:45 2010
1023 From: lists@syshex.com (=?utf-8?q?Jo=C3=A3o_Taveira_Ara=C3=BAjo?=)
1024 Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:34:45 +0100
1025 Subject: [sup-talk] Twitter - new release
1026 In-Reply-To: <1285262666-sup-1123@ethicsgradient.lan>
1027 References: <1284356125-sup-5550@ethicsgradient.lan>
1028 <1285262666-sup-1123@ethicsgradient.lan>
1029 Message-ID: <1285319574-sup-2845@dhcp-87-233.eduroam.ucl.ac.uk>
1030
1031 Excellent, this is potentially really useful, although I think we'll end up needing a twitter mode for sup to handle this properly. I might get round to having a crack at it myself if I get the time, but I haven't really looked into Ruby or sup internals properly.
1032
1033 Excerpts from Matthew Goodall's message of Thu Sep 23 18:26:36 +0100 2010:
1034 > I have released a new version:
1035 > http://github.com/downloads/lionicsheriff/rfc5322/rfc5322-1.0.1.gem
1036 >
1037 > Features:
1038 > + attached images and videos are uploaded to yfrog & url is appended to
1039 > tweet
1040 > + long urls are automatically shortened
1041 > + --pastebin option in sendtweet uploads unused parts of body to
1042 > pastebin. Again urls are appended
1043 > + long tweets are sent to tweetshrink.com before rejecting them
1044 >
1045 > Documentation at: http://github.com/lionicsheriff/rfc5322
1046
1047 I think the name is terrible. I'm not familiar with that RFC, but I'm pretty sure it's not twitter specific, which "fetchtweet" and "sendtweet" imply. Having a .fetchtweetrc fits in a lot better alongside .fetchmailrc too. +1 if the config options are similar too.
1048
1049 Cheers,
1050 Joao.
1051
1052 From dogsaw@thecyberplains.com Fri Sep 24 18:45:20 2010
1053 From: dogsaw@thecyberplains.com (Matthew Goodall)
1054 Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:45:20 +1200
1055 Subject: [sup-talk] Twitter - new release
1056 In-Reply-To: <1285319574-sup-2845@dhcp-87-233.eduroam.ucl.ac.uk>
1057 References: <1284356125-sup-5550@ethicsgradient.lan>
1058 <1285262666-sup-1123@ethicsgradient.lan>
1059 <1285319574-sup-2845@dhcp-87-233.eduroam.ucl.ac.uk>
1060 Message-ID: <1285364787-sup-7922@ethicsgradient.lan>
1061
1062 Excerpts from Jo?o Taveira Ara?jo's message of Fri Sep 24 21:34:45 +1200 2010:
1063 > Excellent, this is potentially really useful, although I think we'll end up needing a twitter mode for sup to handle this properly. I might get round to having a crack at it myself if I get the time, but I haven't really looked into Ruby or sup internals properly.
1064 Yeah we probably would need a real mode. It turns out that Twitter is a
1065 little more fast paced than email.
1066
1067 As it stands, if you have a particularly active stream you are best
1068 off auto-archiving and filtering mentions into your inbox. That is
1069 just speculation though, I am hardly following anyone, so it is all
1070 easily manageable from the inbox.
1071
1072 > I think the name is terrible. I'm not familiar with that RFC, but I'm pretty sure it's not twitter specific, which "fetchtweet" and "sendtweet" imply.
1073 It's the spec for email messages. Personally, I'm unsure about it.
1074 I enjoy the 'via rfc5322' you see on the web interface, but it seems to
1075 me the name would be better served by an email parsing library.
1076
1077 Incidentally the new interface, the so-called #newtwitter, doesn't
1078 readily show the source of the tweet any more (you have to click on it).
1079
1080 >Having a .fetchtweetrc fits in a lot better alongside .fetchmailrc too.
1081 I like the .fetchtweetrc, it links the rc to the tools better. Both
1082 tools use the same config file though, so maybe I could make it accept
1083 .fetchtweetrc and .sendtweetrc with .fetchtweetrc having precedence.
1084
1085 >+1 if the config options are similar too.
1086 That would be interesting, been a long while since I have looked at them
1087 though. I use getmail and offlineimap.
1088