sup

community/pipermail-archives/sup-devel/2011-10.txt (16779B) - raw

 From dmishd@gmail.com  Sat Oct  8 11:15:28 2011
 From: dmishd@gmail.com (Hamish D)
 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:15:28 +0100
 Subject: [sup-devel] Time for sup 0.13?
 Message-ID: <CAOxvSbdWXmHQ78eDqE3Hq5L9m_xDBwpwA18vFdDtTTrig-QJ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 
 Hello all
 
 I'm thinking it might be time to bundle up the last year of sup
 development and push it out there. So if no one objects within a week
 I'll merge next into master. I'll notify this list and sup-talk, and
 give more people a chance to try it out and see if there are any
 regressions. Assuming it's alright we should be able to make it sup
 0.13 in November.
 
 Of course William or Rich will need to push the gem out there as I
 don't have access.
 
 Hamish Downer
 
 From eg@gaute.vetsj.com  Sat Oct  8 12:49:52 2011
 From: eg@gaute.vetsj.com (Gaute Hope)
 Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 18:49:52 +0200
 Subject: [sup-devel] Time for sup 0.13?
 In-Reply-To: <CAOxvSbdWXmHQ78eDqE3Hq5L9m_xDBwpwA18vFdDtTTrig-QJ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 References: <CAOxvSbdWXmHQ78eDqE3Hq5L9m_xDBwpwA18vFdDtTTrig-QJ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 Message-ID: <1318092478-sup-5464@qwerzila>
 
 Excerpts from Hamish D's message of 2011-10-08 17:15:28 +0200:
 > I'm thinking it might be time to bundle up the last year of sup
 > development and push it out there. So if no one objects within a week
 > I'll merge next into master. I'll notify this list and sup-talk, and
 > give more people a chance to try it out and see if there are any
 > regressions. Assuming it's alright we should be able to make it sup
 > 0.13 in November.
 
 Yei! I favour.
 
 - Gaute
 
 From dmishd@gmail.com  Sun Oct  9 13:20:36 2011
 From: dmishd@gmail.com (Hamish D)
 Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:20:36 +0100
 Subject: [sup-devel] Playing with heliotrope/turnsole
 Message-ID: <CAOxvSbeMnuDRgkGupPMxcodq54Y=V38FPWq0893BOLgWT+bVxw@mail.gmail.com>
 
 Hello
 
 I've finally got around to having a bit more of a play with
 turnsole/heliotrope, and I have a few questions that don't appear to
 be answered by the README files.
 
 Firstly, I just tried sending an email using turnsole and got a 500,
 as heliotrope is expecting a particular sendmail command to work.
 Looking through the code I find there is a sendmail hook, but there
 doesn't appear to be a --list-hooks command in heliotrope-add or
 heliotrope-server, or any documentation for the hooks. So I've started
 trying to get it to work and put stuff on the wiki -
 http://sup.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Heliotrope_Sendmail - still a
 work in progress at the moment, though if anyone has a working hook
 for msmtp I'd appreciate it :)
 
 I've also started a wiki page to put general heliotrope/turnsole stuff
 - http://sup.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Heliotrope_And_Turnsole
 
 (As an aside I've noticed there's a little wiki vandalism going on,
 but currently little enough that the occasional manual check should be
 OK.)
 
 Right off to add a few bug reports
 
 Hamish
 
 From wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net  Sun Oct  9 15:27:48 2011
 From: wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net (William Morgan)
 Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 19:27:48 +0000
 Subject: [sup-devel] Playing with heliotrope/turnsole
 In-Reply-To: <CAOxvSbeMnuDRgkGupPMxcodq54Y=V38FPWq0893BOLgWT+bVxw@mail.gmail.com>
 References: <CAOxvSbeMnuDRgkGupPMxcodq54Y=V38FPWq0893BOLgWT+bVxw@mail.gmail.com>
 Message-ID: <1318188240-sup-1604@masanjin.net>
 
 Reformatted excerpts from Hamish D's message of 2011-10-09:
 > I've finally got around to having a bit more of a play with
 > turnsole/heliotrope, and I have a few questions that don't appear to
 > be answered by the README files.
 
 Great! It's still definitely a work in progress, so expect a few rought
 edges, but I've been using it fulltime for the past few months.
 
 > Looking through the code I find there is a sendmail hook, but there
 > doesn't appear to be a --list-hooks command in heliotrope-add or
 > heliotrope-server, or any documentation for the hooks.
 
 Yeah, adding a --list-hooks is TBD. Feel free to make an issue to track
 this.
 
 > So I've started trying to get it to work and put stuff on the wiki -
 > http://sup.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Heliotrope_Sendmail
 
 Awesome. Thank you.
 -- 
 William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>
 
 From dmishd@gmail.com  Sun Oct  9 16:26:01 2011
 From: dmishd@gmail.com (Hamish D)
 Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 21:26:01 +0100
 Subject: [sup-devel] Playing with heliotrope/turnsole
 In-Reply-To: <1318188240-sup-1604@masanjin.net>
 References: <CAOxvSbeMnuDRgkGupPMxcodq54Y=V38FPWq0893BOLgWT+bVxw@mail.gmail.com>
 	<1318188240-sup-1604@masanjin.net>
 Message-ID: <CAOxvSbcpFOH-W1NSzx8no83c-2uOSOdqJovOA6RHNRyViwxjfw@mail.gmail.com>
 
 >> So I've started trying to get it to work and put stuff on the wiki -
 >> http://sup.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Heliotrope_Sendmail
 
 One thing I wonder - is it possible to import labels from sup somehow?
 
 My mailstore has lots of labels I've added by hand over time and I
 wouldn't want to lost that information. (The mailstore I have in mind
 is mbox, but I'm sure others would be interested).
 
 Hamish
 
 From wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net  Sun Oct  9 17:19:42 2011
 From: wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net (William Morgan)
 Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 21:19:42 +0000
 Subject: [sup-devel] Playing with heliotrope/turnsole
 In-Reply-To: <CAOxvSbcpFOH-W1NSzx8no83c-2uOSOdqJovOA6RHNRyViwxjfw@mail.gmail.com>
 References: <CAOxvSbeMnuDRgkGupPMxcodq54Y=V38FPWq0893BOLgWT+bVxw@mail.gmail.com>
 	<1318188240-sup-1604@masanjin.net>
 	<CAOxvSbcpFOH-W1NSzx8no83c-2uOSOdqJovOA6RHNRyViwxjfw@mail.gmail.com>
 Message-ID: <1318195085-sup-6406@masanjin.net>
 
 Reformatted excerpts from Hamish D's message of 2011-10-09:
 > One thing I wonder - is it possible to import labels from sup somehow?
 
 I'm working on the Sup upgrade process. It's a little complicated
 because we need a way to merge multiple sup sources into one, and right
 now Heliotrope's LIFO ordering constraint makes that complicated. But
 I have a plan.
 -- 
 William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>
 
 From eg@gaute.vetsj.com  Thu Oct 13 06:10:27 2011
 From: eg@gaute.vetsj.com (Gaute Hope)
 Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:10:27 +0200
 Subject: [sup-devel] [PATCH] Don't fail on empty lines while expanding
 Message-ID: <1318500554-sup-8811@qwerzila>
 
 While expanding an GPG signature which must have contained a line that
 ended up as nil while chomp'ing, chomp will crash. This patch filters
 out lines which are nil.
 ---
  lib/sup/modes/thread-view-mode.rb |    2 +-
  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/lib/sup/modes/thread-view-mode.rb b/lib/sup/modes/thread-view-mode.rb
 index 9fcc45d..ec1a82e 100644
 --- a/lib/sup/modes/thread-view-mode.rb
 +++ b/lib/sup/modes/thread-view-mode.rb
 @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ private
        else
          width = buffer.content_width
        end
 -      lines = lines.map { |l| l.chomp.wrap width }.flatten
 +      lines = lines.map { |l| l.chomp.wrap width if l }.flatten
      end
      return lines
    end
 -- 
 1.7.7
 
 
 From dmishd@gmail.com  Sun Oct 16 08:09:41 2011
 From: dmishd@gmail.com (Hamish D)
 Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:09:41 +0100
 Subject: [sup-devel] Preparing for sup 0.13
 Message-ID: <CAOxvSbcBz11N1Ac_fr970dPRqDv=e89xzicZoLbH+zTSJTEpcg@mail.gmail.com>
 
 I've merged the next branch into master in preparation for releasing
 sup 0.13. So this is a call for people to try it out and report any
 problems they have before we push it out the door. For basic details
 about running from git see
 http://sup.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Running_From_Git
 
 The major changes since sup 0.12 are:
 
 * crypto stuff rewritten to use the gpgme library, leading to smoother
 operations with encrypted email.
 * add an option for whether sent mail is archived
 * added an account selector when composing email for those who have
 multiple possible from addresses
 * added an asynchronous edit mode - this allows you to carry on using
 sup while composing a message in an external editor
 
 along with various bug fixes large and small.
 
 I'm hoping we can push out 0.13 in November.
 
 Hamish
 
 From marka@pobox.com  Tue Oct 18 09:46:27 2011
 From: marka@pobox.com (Mark Alexander)
 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:46:27 -0400
 Subject: [sup-devel] [sup-talk] Preparing for sup 0.13
 In-Reply-To: <CAOxvSbcBz11N1Ac_fr970dPRqDv=e89xzicZoLbH+zTSJTEpcg@mail.gmail.com>
 References: <CAOxvSbcBz11N1Ac_fr970dPRqDv=e89xzicZoLbH+zTSJTEpcg@mail.gmail.com>
 Message-ID: <1318945224-sup-126@bloovis.org>
 
 Excerpts from Hamish D's message of Sun Oct 16 08:09:41 -0400 2011:
 > * added an asynchronous edit mode - this allows you to carry on using
 > sup while composing a message in an external editor
 
 I'm not having much luck with this feature.  I was able to write an
 async-edit hook that spawned my editor in a separate gnome-terminal
 window.  But when I exited async-edit mode, sup started responding to
 keystrokes weirdly.  I tried to discard the message I had just
 composed using 'x', so sup asked if I wanted to discard the message,
 and when I hit 'y', it sent the message instead of discarding it.
 After that, sup behaved as if every other keystroke was being
 discarded, and I had to quit and restart.
 
 Other than that, things look good.
 
 From dmishd@gmail.com  Tue Oct 18 13:58:40 2011
 From: dmishd@gmail.com (Hamish D)
 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:58:40 +0100
 Subject: [sup-devel] [sup-talk] Preparing for sup 0.13
 In-Reply-To: <1318945224-sup-126@bloovis.org>
 References: <CAOxvSbcBz11N1Ac_fr970dPRqDv=e89xzicZoLbH+zTSJTEpcg@mail.gmail.com>
 	<1318945224-sup-126@bloovis.org>
 Message-ID: <CAOxvSbchWGomtdFSv1yATD1=PvQ0zHZjfrdYx1uJk7RgTqb=CA@mail.gmail.com>
 
 On 18 October 2011 14:46, Mark Alexander <marka at pobox.com> wrote:
 > Excerpts from Hamish D's message of Sun Oct 16 08:09:41 -0400 2011:
 >> * added an asynchronous edit mode - this allows you to carry on using
 >> sup while composing a message in an external editor
 >
 > I'm not having much luck with this feature. ?I was able to write an
 > async-edit hook that spawned my editor in a separate gnome-terminal
 > window. ?But when I exited async-edit mode, sup started responding to
 > keystrokes weirdly. ?I tried to discard the message I had just
 > composed using 'x', so sup asked if I wanted to discard the message,
 > and when I hit 'y', it sent the message instead of discarding it.
 > After that, sup behaved as if every other keystroke was being
 > discarded, and I had to quit and restart.
 
 Could you email me your hook so I can check if there is anything in it
 that might cause trouble? I've used the mode myself a bit and not hit
 that issue.
 
 I guess it's not really a regression as the feature didn't exist in
 sup 0.12, but would still be good to sort it out ...
 
 Hamish
 
 From marka@pobox.com  Wed Oct 19 10:31:29 2011
 From: marka@pobox.com (Mark Alexander)
 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:31:29 -0400
 Subject: [sup-devel] [sup-talk] Preparing for sup 0.13
 In-Reply-To: <CAOxvSbcBz11N1Ac_fr970dPRqDv=e89xzicZoLbH+zTSJTEpcg@mail.gmail.com>
 References: <CAOxvSbcBz11N1Ac_fr970dPRqDv=e89xzicZoLbH+zTSJTEpcg@mail.gmail.com>
 Message-ID: <1319034152-sup-5416@bloovis.org>
 
 Excerpts from Hamish D's message of Sun Oct 16 08:09:41 -0400 2011:
 > * added an account selector when composing email for those who have
 > multiple possible from addresses
 
 I'm having a problem with this feature, too.
 
 I have two main email accounts, one for personal email and one for
 work email.  My before-edit.rb hook figures out which account to use
 as the sender (the "From" header) by looking at the recipients (the
 "To" header).  This worked with sup 0.12, but with 0.13 the sender is
 changed back to the default as soon as I exit the editor.
 
 I see that Sascha Silbe said something about this seven months ago:
 
 > This one would possibly break my workflow. My From address is chosen in
 > the before-edit hook based on the set of recipients. Since you only
 > call before-edit once with headers_full as headers, whatever From
 > address gets chosen for the initial reply mode will "stick".
 
 Here's the sanitized before-edit.rb hook, in case that helps:
 
 unless header["In-reply-to"]
   if header["To"] =~ /widgets/
     to = header["To"]
     info "Sending as widgets, to = #{to}"
     header["From"] = "Mark Alexander <marka at widgets.com>"
   else
     to = header["To"]
     info "Sending as pobox, to = #{to}"
     header["From"] = "Mark Alexander <marka at pobox.com>"
   end
 end
 
 From marka@pobox.com  Thu Oct 20 09:18:01 2011
 From: marka@pobox.com (Mark Alexander)
 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:18:01 -0400
 Subject: [sup-devel] [sup-talk] Preparing for sup 0.13
 In-Reply-To: <1319034152-sup-5416@bloovis.org>
 References: <CAOxvSbcBz11N1Ac_fr970dPRqDv=e89xzicZoLbH+zTSJTEpcg@mail.gmail.com>
 	<1319034152-sup-5416@bloovis.org>
 Message-ID: <1319116525-sup-839@bloovis.org>
 
 Excerpts from Mark Alexander's message of Wed Oct 19 10:31:29 -0400 2011:
 > Excerpts from Hamish D's message of Sun Oct 16 08:09:41 -0400 2011:
 > > * added an account selector when composing email for those who have
 > > multiple possible from addresses
 > 
 > I'm having a problem with this feature, too.
 > 
 > I have two main email accounts, one for personal email and one for
 > work email.  My before-edit.rb hook figures out which account to use
 > as the sender (the "From" header) by looking at the recipients (the
 > "To" header).  This worked with sup 0.12, but with 0.13 the sender is
 > changed back to the default as soon as I exit the editor.
 
 I'm trying out the attached fix, and so far it seems to work.
 it simply moves the calling of the before-edit hook before
 the creation of the account selector.
 -------------- next part --------------
 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
 Name: before-edit.patch
 Type: application/octet-stream
 Size: 877 bytes
 Desc: not available
 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-devel/attachments/20111020/5c9b47e7/attachment.obj>
 
 From jmazzi@gmail.com  Thu Oct 27 08:34:35 2011
 From: jmazzi@gmail.com (Justin Mazzi)
 Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:34:35 +0000 (UTC)
 Subject: [sup-devel] Adding backward synchronization for Maildir sources
 References: <1278693172-sup-6247@mailer> <1300032886-sup-4779@mailer>
 Message-ID: <loom.20111027T143258-562@post.gmane.org>
 
 Damien Leone <damien.leone <at> fensalir.fr> writes:
 
 > 
 > Sup guys,
 > 
 > Sorry for having been so long.
 > 
 > What's new:
 > 
 > - I added an option in sup-sync-back-maildir to merge the :replied and
 > :forwarded labels/flags so the first time you run the script you
 > should not lose any information on the IMAP side;
 > 
 > - A way to detect if sup-sync-back-to-maildir should be executed in
 > order to synchronize your index back to the Maildir source in order to
 > prevent any loss of information. A magic file is written in the
 > configuration directory everytime the script is executed and it is
 > removed when the sync_back_to_maildir option is set from false to
 > true;
 > 
 > - I fixed a case when messages were not properly updated when they
 > were remotely modified.
 > 
 > I have pushed the last commits to the maildir-sync branch [0], it is
 > rebased from master. I also have a branch rebased from next on my own
 > repository if you'd rather a more up to date branch [1].
 > 
 > Please test and review! For more informations and a howto, read the
 > message quoted below this mail.
 > 
 > [0] http://gitorious.org/sup/mainline/commits/maildir-sync
 > [1] http://git.fensalir.fr/?p=dleone/sup.git
 
 Hey,
 
 The syncing is working pretty well for me except for one thing (with Gmail). 
 
 When archiving a message in sup it doesn't remove the Inbox label 
 from the message. Removing the Inbox label from the message is 
 what makes the email disappear from other clients, like a 
 smartphone.
 
 - Justin Mazzi
 
 
 
 
 From flavio@castelli.name  Sat Oct 29 06:39:12 2011
 From: flavio@castelli.name (Flavio Castelli)
 Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 12:39:12 +0200
 Subject: [sup-devel] Sup and imap
 Message-ID: <CAAs+i9JMHw9_TLohiF-jvq4q_g16ao+Au4mPUtwfv=yCtNY-TA@mail.gmail.com>
 
 Hello I would like to know the status of the IMAP support. I read some
 entries on the wiki talking about it but they are a bit outdated.
 
 Is now possible to propagate the actions performed via sup back to the
 IMAP server?
 
 Thanks in advance
 Flavio
 
 From michael+sup@stapelberg.de  Sat Oct 29 08:05:52 2011
 From: michael+sup@stapelberg.de (Michael Stapelberg)
 Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:05:52 +0100
 Subject: [sup-devel] Sup and imap
 In-Reply-To: <CAAs+i9JMHw9_TLohiF-jvq4q_g16ao+Au4mPUtwfv=yCtNY-TA@mail.gmail.com>
 References: <CAAs+i9JMHw9_TLohiF-jvq4q_g16ao+Au4mPUtwfv=yCtNY-TA@mail.gmail.com>
 Message-ID: <1319889919-sup-7626@stapelberg.de>
 
 Hi Flavio,
 
 Excerpts from Flavio Castelli's message of 2011-10-29 11:39:12 +0100:
 > Hello I would like to know the status of the IMAP support. I read some
 > entries on the wiki talking about it but they are a bit outdated.
 sup doesn?t have IMAP support due to the ruby IMAP libraries being buggy.
 
 > Is now possible to propagate the actions performed via sup back to the
 > IMAP server?
 Use offlineimap, it can sync in both directions.
 
 Best regards,
 Michael