* Which version of ruby is best to use for sup?
@ 2015-03-18 14:47 pengyu.ut
2015-03-18 15:13 ` [sup] " Mark Alexander
2015-03-18 15:14 ` Ben Pote
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pengyu.ut @ 2015-03-18 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: supmua
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 434 bytes --]
Hi,
The Ruby website says "Support for Ruby 1.9.3 has ended"
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2015/02/23/support-for-ruby-1-9-3-has-ended/
But sup github page still recommends 1.9.3.
https://github.com/sup-heliotrope/sup/wiki/Installation%3A-General-Process
I have tried ruby 2.2.1. But sup can not be correctly installed.
Could anybody let me know which version of Ruby is currently recommend to
use with sup?
Regards,
Peng
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 502 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [sup] Which version of ruby is best to use for sup?
2015-03-18 14:47 Which version of ruby is best to use for sup? pengyu.ut
@ 2015-03-18 15:13 ` Mark Alexander
2015-03-18 15:14 ` Ben Pote
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Alexander @ 2015-03-18 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pengyu.ut; +Cc: supmua
Excerpts from pengyu.ut's message of 2015-03-18 10:47:17 -0400:
> Could anybody let me know which version of Ruby is currently recommend to
> use with sup?
I am not sure exactly which version is the preferred one. But I'm happily
running sup with ruby 2.0 on Linux Mint 17 (same as Ubuntu 14.04).
% ruby --version
ruby 2.0.0p384 (2014-01-12) [x86_64-linux-gnu]
% aptitude search "~i ruby2"
i A libruby2.0 - Libraries necessary to run Ruby 2.0
i ruby2.0 - Interpreter of object-oriented scripting language Ruby
i ruby2.0-dev - Header files for compiling extension modules for the Ruby
i ruby2.0-doc - Documentation for Ruby 2.0
i ruby2.0-tcltk - Ruby/Tk for Ruby 2.0
% gem env
RubyGems Environment:
- RUBYGEMS VERSION: 2.0.14
- RUBY VERSION: 2.0.0 (2014-01-12 patchlevel 384) [x86_64-linux-gnu]
- INSTALLATION DIRECTORY: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/2.0.0
- RUBY EXECUTABLE: /usr/bin/ruby2.0
- EXECUTABLE DIRECTORY: /usr/bin
- RUBYGEMS PLATFORMS:
- ruby
- x86_64-linux
- GEM PATHS:
- /usr/lib/ruby/gems/2.0.0
- /home/bloovis/.gem/ruby/2.0.0
- GEM CONFIGURATION:
- :update_sources => true
- :verbose => true
- :backtrace => false
- :bulk_threshold => 1000
- REMOTE SOURCES:
- https://rubygems.org/
% gem list --local | grep sup
activesupport (4.1.6)
rmail-sup (1.0.1)
sup (0.21.0)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [sup] Which version of ruby is best to use for sup?
2015-03-18 14:47 Which version of ruby is best to use for sup? pengyu.ut
2015-03-18 15:13 ` [sup] " Mark Alexander
@ 2015-03-18 15:14 ` Ben Pote
2015-03-18 15:24 ` Peng Yu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ben Pote @ 2015-03-18 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: None
I'm running sup on Ruby 2.2.1 now, are you sure you installed the latest gem?
Should be version 0.21.0.
Excerpts from pengyu.ut's message of 2015-03-18
07:47:17 -0700:
> Hi,
>
> The Ruby website says "Support for Ruby 1.9.3 has ended"
>
> https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2015/02/23/support-for-ruby-1-9-3-has-ended/
>
> But sup github page still recommends 1.9.3.
>
> https://github.com/sup-heliotrope/sup/wiki/Installation%3A-General-Process
>
> I have tried ruby 2.2.1. But sup can not be correctly installed.
>
> Could anybody let me know which version of Ruby is currently recommend to
> use with sup?
>
> Regards,
> Peng
>
--
Ben Pote
Public PGP key: https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB3BAFECBA7AFC2EF
PGP fingerprint: 695B 9B5D A910 B280 92D1 360E B3BA FECB A7AF C2EF
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [sup] Which version of ruby is best to use for sup?
2015-03-18 15:14 ` Ben Pote
@ 2015-03-18 15:24 ` Peng Yu
[not found] ` <1426692597-sup-9381@stromboli>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peng Yu @ 2015-03-18 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Pote; +Cc: None
> I'm running sup on Ruby 2.2.1 now, are you sure you installed the latest gem?
> Should be version 0.21.0.
Here is what I have about gem. I'm not sure why I get a much larger
version number than yours.
~$ which gem
/usr/local/bin/gem
~$ gem --version
2.4.5
--
Regards,
Peng
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [sup] Which version of ruby is best to use for sup?
[not found] ` <1426692597-sup-9381@stromboli>
@ 2015-03-18 15:52 ` Peng Yu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peng Yu @ 2015-03-18 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Pote, None
>> > I'm running sup on Ruby 2.2.1 now, are you sure you installed the latest gem?
>> > Should be version 0.21.0.
> Sorry, I meant the Sup version!
Yes. I am trying to install sup-0.21.0.
Fetching: sup-0.21.0.gem (100%)
--
Regards,
Peng
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-18 15:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-18 14:47 Which version of ruby is best to use for sup? pengyu.ut
2015-03-18 15:13 ` [sup] " Mark Alexander
2015-03-18 15:14 ` Ben Pote
2015-03-18 15:24 ` Peng Yu
[not found] ` <1426692597-sup-9381@stromboli>
2015-03-18 15:52 ` Peng Yu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox