From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-GM-THRID: 27575451648
X-Google-Groups: supmua
X-Google-Thread: 3030fda1bf,8725209dcb0415fa
X-Google-Attributes: gid3030fda1bf,domainid0,public,googlegroup
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Received: by 10.42.46.16 with SMTP id i16mr4983176icf.21.1406639731837;
        Tue, 29 Jul 2014 06:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: supmua@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.154.101 with SMTP id vn5ls402395igb.14.gmail; Tue, 29 Jul
 2014 06:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.66.141.165 with SMTP id rp5mr626660pab.47.1406639731542;
        Tue, 29 Jul 2014 06:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>
Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com (mail-qa0-f43.google.com [209.85.216.43])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id he4si216210qcb.0.2014.07.29.06.15.30
        for <supmua@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Tue, 29 Jul 2014 06:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: none (google.com: eg@gaute.vetsj.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=209.85.216.43;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;
       spf=neutral (google.com: eg@gaute.vetsj.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=eg@gaute.vetsj.com
Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id w8so9273446qac.16
        for <supmua@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 06:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=9XqTpskm2HaZJZ//gc+oCFYC8YUb6MCt0nIzyMGV5og=;
        b=O1GS+T9djs750cEQWYxCVLer8isdnIQ34DemJMeo8RMOM0Brcm5O2a3hQh/c3afD8p
         hHvsh43oh68cvj4F3wDVpfEnqrha+1tFlhgWVZJ2VsoOKXeUpzwiJNOwsfYDxoSDa+gy
         FaFAJ0gEPkZSuphJnck7JCSvJGatKfLMZRrTpYZ7CJb9GRA7mkX2UsP6y9MSu8fatMbQ
         Zu0ZcFKF248TYUXKI/o7GHe67ejt2KX2V0TqOspoWNNyTfKOaE0g+JZ9J2Ny9tX9mtnB
         GLiiQ2A6VHG7JX50I4ieGVQsuSwFOeqf7YvfS5GcqtEdIjMFd0OGV/dU1jDvmNTFjCFW
         DiPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm7sGFwy8x5OpDkIzxzwDpnoLV6qk2D76Z7XazazSIrr+JAHSbnw3U/o+PIjZDUUHJnlxdI
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.226.135 with SMTP id iw7mr3438155qcb.13.1406639730641;
 Tue, 29 Jul 2014 06:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.88.40 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 06:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <trinity-40c4ba6a-e23f-44b6-9d87-63061d4b9b29-1406638933924@3capp-webde-bs49>
References: <817371.257205622-sendEmail@ruthard-lappi>
	<CABKe4MsuZz+u+NJ4o5_jN4FQz4zGsMMfvDhYZeWDHHw18o5VpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<trinity-40c4ba6a-e23f-44b6-9d87-63061d4b9b29-1406638933924@3capp-webde-bs49>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:15:30 +0200
Message-ID: <CABKe4MuFHY5KH7fEANeU9Y6gDRkTBQcFWs5P0YOpgVoPPqBkbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [sup] ncursesw segmentation fault after update
From: Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>
To: Ruthard Baudach <ruthard.baudach@web.de>, 
	"supmua@googlegroups.com" <supmua@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Ruthard Baudach <ruthard.baudach@web.de> wrote:
>
>
> Yes,
> I tried:
> ruby 1.9.1 => sup 0.19 needs >= 1.9.3
> ruby 1.9.3 with ncursesw 1.4.9 and 1.4.2 => segfault
> ruby 2.1.2 with ncursesw >= 1.4.2 => segfault.
>
> By the way, im using sup in byobu (ubuntu's enhanced gnu screen) over sup. Shoudn't make a difference though.
>

Does this happen with a completely clean setup as well (empty .sup
directory)? Could you try it without byobu as well?

- gaute