From: dato@net.com.org.es (Adeodato Simó)
Subject: [sup-talk] [RFC] Fix parsing of encrypted messages that contain further multipart elements
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:12:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff7df0405d003a8f4e88f0dd191d8bf4875f73f3.1248368899.git.dato@net.com.org.es> (raw)
---
Hello,
this is just a RFC, because I can't think of any elegant way to address
the issue, given the shortcomings of the RMail API. Please read the
lengthy comment in the patch, and let me know if anybody has any ideas
about this issue.
P.S.: I've created a "sup-dato" repository in Gitorious, in case that's
helpful. Should I be creating merge requests?
lib/sup/crypto.rb | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/sup/crypto.rb b/lib/sup/crypto.rb
index 8ec277b..6ef0c0e 100644
--- a/lib/sup/crypto.rb
+++ b/lib/sup/crypto.rb
@@ -132,8 +132,25 @@ class CryptoManager
end
end
+ # This is gross. The decrypted payload could very well be a multipart
+ # element itself, as opposed to a simple payload; for example, a
+ # multipart/signed element, like Mutt does when encrypting and signing a
+ # message (instead of clearsigning it). Supposedly, decrypted_payload
+ # being a multipart element ought to work out nicely because in
+ # Message::multipart_encrypted_to_chunks() the decrypted message is run
+ # though message_to_chunks() again to get any children. However, it does
+ # not work as intended because this inner payload need not carry a
+ # MIME-Version header, yet they are fed to RMail as a top-level message,
+ # for which the MIME-Version header is required, which causes for the
+ # part not to be detected as multipart. If we detect this is happening,
+ # force the payload to be interpreted as MIME.
+ msg = RMail::Parser.read(decrypted_payload)
+ if msg.header.content_type =~ %r{^multipart/} and not msg.multipart?
+ decrypted_payload = "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" + decrypted_payload
+ msg = RMail::Parser.read(decrypted_payload)
+ end
notice = Chunk::CryptoNotice.new :valid, "This message has been decrypted for display"
- [RMail::Parser.read(decrypted_payload), sig, notice]
+ [msg, sig, notice]
else
notice = Chunk::CryptoNotice.new :invalid, "This message could not be decrypted", output.split("\n")
[nil, nil, notice]
--
1.6.3.3
next reply other threads:[~2009-07-23 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-23 17:12 Adeodato Simó [this message]
2009-07-23 17:19 ` [sup-talk] [PATCH] " Adeodato Simó
2009-09-12 17:08 ` William Morgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff7df0405d003a8f4e88f0dd191d8bf4875f73f3.1248368899.git.dato@net.com.org.es \
--to=dato@net.com.org.es \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox