Re: [sup-talk] Choosing a bug tracker for Sup

From: Mike Kelly <pioto@pioto.org>
To: sup-talk <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>
Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Choosing a bug tracker for Sup
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:34:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afd0a1d89ddee05080dcaf20f03bdefa@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1257261315-sup-977@masanjin.net>

On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:16:15 -0800, William Morgan
<wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net> wrote:
> Reformatted excerpts from Mike Kelly's message of 2009-11-03:
>> As much as I hate to suggest it... RT should have all of these
>> qualities.
> 
> Rrrrrrrrreally. Is it a pain to set up? Why do you hate to suggest it?
> (I've heard people complain about it before, but I don't remember any of
> the details.)

Yes, somewhat, IIRC. But, I haven't really ever had to set it up. It's one
of those things which requires half of CPAN to work. So, it was annoying
when I made an attempt to package it for a distro, but if you're just
installing it following their directions, it's probably not that bad.

But, someone is able to get away with charging $3250 a month for a
"platinum" managed install of it. (Then again, some enterprises will pay
anything for hosting...)

Let me try a test install real quick, and I'll get back to you.

-- 
Mike Kelly
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk