From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marka@pobox.com (Mark Alexander) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:11:05 -0700 Subject: [sup-talk] preparing for 0.7 In-Reply-To: <1237383823-sup-8242@entry> References: <1237224356-sup-1941@entry> <1237383823-sup-8242@entry> Message-ID: On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:49 AM, William Morgan wrote: > I'm definitely interested in whether it holds up. It's holding up very well; no crashes after two days. This is wonderful! I have encountered a few odd minor issues. One is that it seems not to recognize Message-ID headers that are split over two lines. For example, here's one that caused it to generate a faked-up ID: Message-ID: <72E99544C4530E4F92DCC03303F8CF820145EDC05D at PA-EXMBX01.widget.com> There's a newline after the colon, and the message ID follows on the next line, indented with one space. I believe this one was generated by Outlook, but I've also seen Alpine do this. This is messing up threading. Without delving into the source, I am guessing this an rmail bug, not a sup bug.