From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marcus-sup@quintic.co.uk (Marcus Williams)
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:13:18 +0100
Subject: [sup-talk] Refreshing inbox & removing +inbox label
In-Reply-To: <0b19eaf10004a252@IMSS-WIN>
References: <0a4e8b9700043d81@IMSS-WIN> <472063D9.40704@quintic.co.uk>
	<20071025114926.88e91efb.alexander.panek@brainsware.org>
	<0b19eaf10004a252@IMSS-WIN>
Message-ID: <4721BDBE.8090401@quintic.co.uk>

On 25/10/2007 vasudeva wrote:
> Would it be desireable to be able to tag (or affect) threads *not*
> listed? 
> 
> That seems useful to me. Say you've got 3000 messages labeled, and
> now you want to change the label without painstakingly loading them
> all into your view.  Maybe you've just finished syncing ten trillion
> emails from your old mbox sources and realize you didn't plan your
> label strategy very well...

I think it would be useful to be able to rename labels but I guess only
as a separate tool. I've found I only tend to tag separate messages or a
smallish number like a set of search results (but large enough to make
my patch worth while to me), I rarely have to tag *all* messages.

Marcus