From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marcus-sup@quintic.co.uk (Marcus Williams)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:18:37 +0100
Subject: [sup-talk] [PATCH] New hook (enabling message filters)
In-Reply-To: <4d7f58120018376f@IMSS-WIN>
References: <47188C6F.30008@quintic.co.uk>
	<4d4780f700181787@IMSS-WIN>	<4d6e9e1600182d59@IMSS-WIN>
	<4718B60F.1090208@quintic.co.uk> <4d7f58120018376f@IMSS-WIN>
Message-ID: <4718BCBD.2030307@quintic.co.uk>

On 19/10/2007 David Stubbs wrote:
> There are a few things I want to get sorted spam filtering is one of
>  them. I'm assuming I'll be able to use your new patch to do spam
> filtering.

Yep, you can mark things directly as spam by adding the spam label I
think, although I've not tried this yet. You could also kill a message
by adding killed as a label.

So assuming your spam checker adds "SPAM" or something to the subject
you can just do:

message.add_label "spam" if message.subj =~ /SPAM/

I think you can also use the message.raw_headers to look for specific
headers (like X-Spam-Status if you're using spamassassin).

I'm not sure if the reserved labels like spam/killed etc can be added as
strings or if you have to add them as symbols :spam or :killed - they're
symbols in the code but they may get converted into strings when added
to the index. Easy enough to test though.

Marcus