From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kendall@clarkparsia.com (kendall at clarkparsia.com)
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 22:48:43 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [sup-talk] Beginner questions
Message-ID: <47149.192.168.1.71.1209955723.webmail@192.168.1.71>

On Sunday, May 4, 2008 9:02pm, Daniel Wagner <daniel at wagner-home.com> said:

> Excerpts from yanghatespam's message of Sun May 04 17:47:50 -0700 2008:
>> If sup's thread-grouping is decent, then it would be neat/more accurate
>> to extend sup somehow to instead use these groupings for the filtering.
>>   I.e., if an incoming message is grouped with a thread in which I was a
>> participant, then leave it marked unread; otherwise, mark it read.
> 
> Well, sup already has a pretty nice (and similar) feature for killing
> entire threads.  The '&' key will archive a thread permanently; that is,
> if new mails arrive in that thread, they will automatically be archived.
> So, you can hit '&' once for each thread you don't want to read; the
> rest will reappear in you inbox as new mails arrive in them.

Which reminds me that, as of 0.5 release, the bug I reported about &-killed threads reappearing is still present.

But, other than that, 0.5 is a treat.

Cheers,
Kendall