From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.58.247.3 with SMTP id ya3csp288309vec; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:05:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.77.131 with SMTP id s3mr4114453igw.20.1348092346102; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:05:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (50-56-192-79.static.cloud-ips.com. [50.56.192.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id kg5si21387465igc.48.2012.09.19.15.05.45; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 50.56.192.79 as permitted sender) client-ip=50.56.192.79; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 50.56.192.79 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@lifeintegrity.com Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDFC2E086; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:05:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 510 seconds by postgrey-1.31 at rubyforge; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:05:32 UTC Received: from lifeintegrity.com (lifeintegrity.com [173.48.39.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949162E073 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vent.lifeintegrity.com (173-162-190-62-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.162.190.62]) by lifeintegrity.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63D5543 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:56:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lifeintegrity.com; s=s0; t=1348091818; bh=3+5Mse1uv3NAGpjzHqc+VY0xKnrQxF7q+XB13u7sj/M=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=FZW+LPJsLfiETcEq4XYREfhCmmguz82vD8fjPmTNkBPH9bDezLz50BLetVc8+WDeX EgYJtraJnwWkz/qF4tKianm6ubhHbhDZljq+GXs5FB+n3ridHBfo8vI8G043zVTxmx ETSTG8uD253cw5WcwJffRI32UvJXadtEEGbDaszA= Received: by vent.lifeintegrity.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D4D831835B0; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:56:57 -0400 From: Allan Wind To: sup-talk@rubyforge.org Message-ID: <20120919215657.GA17624@lifeintegrity.com> Mail-Followup-To: sup-talk@rubyforge.org References: <20120919211500.GH48050@armakuni.lastninja.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120919211500.GH48050@armakuni.lastninja.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [sup-talk] any testimonials from users who transitioned from mutt? X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org On 2012-09-19 14:15:00, Naveen Nathan wrote: > I was wondering if any mutt users who use some of the above features > mentioned would mind sharing their experience after transitioning to Sup. > Although I wouldn't be surprised if people still continue to use both. sup, afaik, is dead : I leave behind me the wreckage of unmaintained or handed-off projects: ... Sup, an email client for people with lots of mail. You may, however, want to check out and /Allan -- Allan Wind Life Integrity, LLC _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk