From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.58.247.3 with SMTP id ya3csp285527vec; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:35:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.45.234 with SMTP id q10mr4054590igm.33.1348090527929; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (50-56-192-79.static.cloud-ips.com. [50.56.192.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id vh7si21305025igb.20.2012.09.19.14.35.27; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 50.56.192.79 as permitted sender) client-ip=50.56.192.79; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 50.56.192.79 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491A62E083; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:35:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 902 seconds by postgrey-1.31 at rubyforge; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:35:11 UTC Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA21B2E073 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TERgh-0006Ay-C7 for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:20:03 +0200 Received: from armakuni.lastninja.net ([216.144.229.211]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:20:03 +0200 Received: from naveen by armakuni.lastninja.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:20:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: sup-talk@rubyforge.org From: Naveen Nathan Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:15:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20120919211500.GH48050@armakuni.lastninja.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: armakuni.lastninja.net Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: [sup-talk] any testimonials from users who transitioned from mutt? X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Hi, Mutt and mail savvy user here. It's my daily use client, I use a lot of it's features such as threading, tagging, header caching (for imap). What it truly lacks, even though slightly supported by IMAP, is full-body search of email, indexing, etc. I was wondering if any mutt users who use some of the above features mentioned would mind sharing their experience after transitioning to Sup. Although I wouldn't be surprised if people still continue to use both. - Naveen _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk