From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dato@net.com.org.es (Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?=) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:01:16 +0100 Subject: [sup-talk] [PATCH 2/2] xapian index format versioning In-Reply-To: <1250451331-16070-2-git-send-email-rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu> References: <1250451331-16070-1-git-send-email-rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu> <1250451331-16070-2-git-send-email-rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu> Message-ID: <20090816200116.GA17272@chistera.yi.org> + Rich Lane (Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:35:31 -0700): > + fail "Index version #{db_version.inspect} is different than Sup > version #{INDEX_VERSION.inspect}" The second part of the sentence seems to refer to Sup's version itself, rather than what it really means (the index version expected by the running version of Sup). Maybe the following wording could work better? | This Sup version expects a v#{INDEX_VERSION.inspect} index, whereas | v#{db_version.inspect} is in the filesystem. (And, perhaps, suggesting what to do next would be grea too.) HTH, -- - Are you sure we're good? - Always. -- Rory and Lorelai