From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrew@pimlott.net (Andrew Pimlott) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:01:08 -0700 Subject: [sup-talk] Read only mode for sup In-Reply-To: <1239193758-sup-8985@baad> References: <1239128578-sup-6684@ausone.local> <1239146860-sup-6624@baad> <1239179745-sup-912@ausone.inria.fr> <1239193758-sup-8985@baad> Message-ID: <20090408170108.GW11701@pimlott.net> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 08:30:05AM -0400, Ian Smith wrote: > Excerpts from Nicolas Pouillard's message of Wed Apr 08 04:36:23 -0400 2009: > > Excerpts from Ian Smith's message of Wed Apr 08 01:29:04 +0200 2009: > > > This use case already works using buffers - you can switch between them > > > fairly easily. I need to rewrite my reflexes still, but I run sup in > > > screen, so it can't be that hard. > > > > Even when you are editing a mail? > > Oh, you're right - you have to switch into reply-mode, out of the > editor. Hmm. I've always wondered, could a mailer use job control, like a shell, to allow it to have multiple sub-processes and switch among them? Then, you could suspend your editor and get back to sup, and later resume your editor. Andrew