From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: me@pekdon.net (Claes =?iso-8859-1?B?TuRzdOlu?=) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:37:56 +0200 Subject: [sup-talk] sending mail; setting smtp server In-Reply-To: <1191619979-sup-726@south> References: <47031532.800@edwardog.net> <1191447868-sup-1612@south> <1191619979-sup-726@south> Message-ID: <20071007093756.GE22422@hydrogen.pekdon.net> Hi, On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 02:34:31PM -0700, William Morgan wrote: > Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Wed Oct 03 14:52:42 -0700 2007: > > Sup calls out to a sendmail binary rather than talking SMTP directly. > > To be clear, it would be possible to have Sup talk SMTP directly, if > that were beneficial to people. I like handing off work to other > software when possible, and I figured most Sup users would have a > working sendmail, but I could be wrong. What do people think? > Well, one could always use something like msmtp http://msmtp.sourceforge.net/ instead of a full MTA. However, I have not followed this discussion closely, but would it then be possible to specify a full sendmail command if one can not replace /usr/sbin/sendmail ? > > -- > William > _______________________________________________ > sup-talk mailing list > sup-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk -- Claes N?st?n, , http://www.pekdon.net/ "Money has corrupted so much in this world, life would be meaningless if it kills music as well." - Bin?rpilot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20071007/18e608c9/attachment.bin