From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: magnus@therning.org (Magnus Therning)
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:35:42 +0100
Subject: [sup-talk] new in svn: gpg signature verification
In-Reply-To: <1189834628-sup-6238@south>
References: <1189834628-sup-6238@south>
Message-ID: <20070915103542.GB3361@die.therning.org>

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 22:55:43 -0700, William Morgan wrote:
>Still highly experimental, but if you have gpg or pgp in your path, you
>should now see a notice at the top of each signed message saying that
>the signature was good, bad, or unknown. Please let me know how this
>works, particularly if it claims a signature is bad when it actually
>isn't. (Figuring out exactly how to format the signed payload such that
>gpg/pgp accepts it has been non-trivial.)

Seems to work like a charm :-)

Once signing of message is added I can start reading _and_ writing mail
in sup.  And when it has support for encrypted emails (sending &
receiving) then mutt is history!

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning                             (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus?therning?org             Jabber: magnus?therning?gmail?com
http://therning.org/magnus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20070915/3087d189/attachment.bin