From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.52.236.136 with SMTP id uu8csp125578vdc; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:40:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.15.31.197 with SMTP id y45mr53095445eeu.18.1365961206089; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:40:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net. [212.227.17.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m7si24477017eey.80.2013.04.14.10.40.05; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:40:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eric.weikl@gmx.net designates 212.227.17.20 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.17.20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eric.weikl@gmx.net designates 212.227.17.20 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eric.weikl@gmx.net Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.33]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LzEWl-1UegK52rD7-014R9E for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 19:40:04 +0200 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2013 17:40:04 -0000 Received: from ppp-93-104-97-71.dynamic.mnet-online.de (EHLO localhost) [93.104.97.71] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 14 Apr 2013 19:40:04 +0200 X-Authenticated: #493079 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+Oa2dIY8GO979XLhXCdnVO22RPM3M6R1e/8rWyaA lQHVBfsU5WUekt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: Eric Weikl To: Gaute Hope Cc: sup-talk Subject: Re: [sup-devel] [sup-talk] sup: Fix for an UndefinedMethodError In-reply-to: <516A9BA0.7040906@gaute.vetsj.com> References: <51692285.8000709@gaute.vetsj.com> <51695AF1.2070701@gaute.vetsj.com> <5169925C.1060701@gaute.vetsj.com> <516997BD.7010409@gaute.vetsj.com> <1365938152-sup-6420@mint> <516A9BA0.7040906@gaute.vetsj.com> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 19:39:53 +0200 Message-Id: <1365960274-sup-7139@mint> User-Agent: Sup/git Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Hi Gaute, Excerpts from Gaute Hope's message of 2013-04-14 14:05:52 +0200: > In my view the main arguments are: > > - Manipulating IMAP could mess up user mail (potentially new bugs could > mess up) Yes. Although my experience was positive until now, this definitely needs extensive testing (especially when disabled). Volunteers, anyone? :-) > I would suggest creating a official branch for this now, if you are > interested I could add you as commiter or owner. Sure, I can give it a spin. Cheers, Eric