From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.58.247.3 with SMTP id ya3csp287473vec; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.25.129 with SMTP id c1mr4012627oeg.36.1348091801541; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (50-56-192-79.static.cloud-ips.com. [50.56.192.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c2si3529760obd.71.2012.09.19.14.56.41; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 50.56.192.79 as permitted sender) client-ip=50.56.192.79; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 50.56.192.79 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1C52E086; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:56:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 539 seconds by postgrey-1.31 at rubyforge; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:56:22 UTC Received: from boobierack.masterkorp.net (static.34.107.46.78.clients.your-server.de [78.46.107.34]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9192E073 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by boobierack.masterkorp.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 728E6F06FF6; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:47:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Alfredo Palhares To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <20120919211500.GH48050@armakuni.lastninja.net> References: <20120919211500.GH48050@armakuni.lastninja.net> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:47:19 +0200 Message-Id: <1348090678-sup-2446@masterkorp.net> User-Agent: Sup/0.11 Subject: Re: [sup-talk] any testimonials from users who transitioned from mutt? X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Excerpts from Naveen Nathan's message of Wed Sep 19 23:15:00 +0200 2012: > Hi, > > Mutt and mail savvy user here. It's my daily use client, I use a lot of > it's features such as threading, tagging, header caching (for imap). > > What it truly lacks, even though slightly supported by IMAP, is full-body > search of email, indexing, etc. What i notice the most, is *speed*, mutt gets unbearable on big mailboxes. Also the label is approach is much better, just because having more than one label in an thread can be very usefull. Also prefer the UI, tudier for tilling WMs and smarthphones (altough mutt can be customized) > I was wondering if any mutt users who use some of the above features > mentioned would mind sharing their experience after transitioning to Sup. > Although I wouldn't be surprised if people still continue to use both. One thing about sup, is that you have to go cold turkey, sup does not sync back to the mailbox. I solved that problem by placing it under tmux on a 24/7 avaliable server, so i just ssh to tmux, from the computer, cellphone, public machine whatever. I eventually want to migrate to heliotrope once a decent client shows up. But if you're on mutt and dont bother about using only one client for email, Sup is awesome -- Regards, Alfredo Palhares _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk