From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.52.169.74 with SMTP id ac10cs79181vdc; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:05:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.69.132 with SMTP id yc4mr250666icb.221.1300392344538; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:05:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 34si3542209ibi.142.2011.03.17.13.05.43; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:05:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7963C8043; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:05:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from garcia.cquest.utoronto.ca (garcia.cquest.utoronto.ca [192.82.128.9]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8223C805E for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:55:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca ([128.100.160.254]:47185 ident=93) by garcia.cquest.utoronto.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q0JHp-0007Iy-Ug for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:55:09 -0400 Received: from bwalton by pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0JHp-0007W3-Tm for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:55:09 -0400 From: Ben Walton To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1300385916-sup-3971@plc.intranet.plecavalier.com> References: <1300371126-sup-4692@plc.intranet.plecavalier.com> <1300375667-sup-4657@panda> <1300385916-sup-3971@plc.intranet.plecavalier.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:55:09 -0400 Message-Id: <1300391638-sup-7379@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] background or queue msg sending X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Excerpts from Philippe LeCavalier's message of Thu Mar 17 15:15:30 -0400 2011: Hi Philippe, > Even if Exim or Postfix might act faster than msmtp(what I'm using > now) sup is set up in a way that it waits for the process to > terminate before bringing me to the previous buffer. What I'd like > to suggest is that sup should immediately bring you to the previous > buffer. I get a near instant return to the buffer when submitting via 'sendmail' (exim in my case). It's only takes the time required to spit the content of the mail through the pipe to that process...once done, the delivery is asyncrhonous to sup. If it's not behaving that way when using a real mta, something with the mta config is borked.[1] Thanks -Ben [1] By default sendmail used to try immediate handoff before queuing, which could result in delayed return. I'm not sure if it still does though. -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk