* [sup-talk] renaming label woes
@ 2011-02-15 15:26 Philippe LeCavalier
2011-02-15 16:43 ` Philipp Überbacher
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Philippe LeCavalier @ 2011-02-15 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sup-talk
I changed my mind on a certain label I had setup and wanted to rename it. I first looked at using sup-tweak-labels but opted against that tool since I couldn't figure out how to limit add/remove to a specific set of query results. Instead I loaded sup, performed a search for that label, did !!, T, =, l and -FF ff (FF being the label in question). I refreshed the screen to see the changes(@) and the old label(FF) reappeared. I thought it might be some sort of case sensitivity thing so I then did: !!, T, =, l, -FF <enter> and =, l, ff <enter>. When I refreshed that time the change appeared to take. So I closed the buffer.
Now when I search for 'ff' I only get a few threads whereas previously I had over 800. Interestingly enough, If I search by from: or subject...etc. of which I know I'll get a hit within that label the label 'ff' is there as expected. So why can't I search for 'ff' anymore? I'm guessing something with the indexing has gone a-scew. I remembered seeing "Optimizing index..." when looking to do this with sup-tweak-labels so I went ahead and did a dry-run but that didn't help the situation -maybe I shouldn't have done --dry-run? Or maybe I'm way off here ;-)
...help.
--
Thanks,
Phil
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [sup-talk] renaming label woes
2011-02-15 15:26 [sup-talk] renaming label woes Philippe LeCavalier
@ 2011-02-15 16:43 ` Philipp Überbacher
2011-02-15 19:01 ` Philippe LeCavalier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Philipp Überbacher @ 2011-02-15 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sup-talk
Excerpts from Philippe LeCavalier's message of 2011-02-15 16:26:48 +0100:
> I changed my mind on a certain label I had setup and wanted to rename it. I first looked at using sup-tweak-labels but opted against that tool since I couldn't figure out how to limit add/remove to a specific set of query results. Instead I loaded sup, performed a search for that label, did !!, T, =, l and -FF ff (FF being the label in question). I refreshed the screen to see the changes(@) and the old label(FF) reappeared. I thought it might be some sort of case sensitivity thing so I then did: !!, T, =, l, -FF <enter> and =, l, ff <enter>. When I refreshed that time the change appeared to take. So I closed the buffer.
>
> Now when I search for 'ff' I only get a few threads whereas previously I had over 800. Interestingly enough, If I search by from: or subject...etc. of which I know I'll get a hit within that label the label 'ff' is there as expected. So why can't I search for 'ff' anymore? I'm guessing something with the indexing has gone a-scew. I remembered seeing "Optimizing index..." when looking to do this with sup-tweak-labels so I went ahead and did a dry-run but that didn't help the situation -maybe I shouldn't have done --dry-run? Or maybe I'm way off here ;-)
>
> ...help.
My experience with sup-tweak-labels today suggests that each run it gets
only part of the messages. Maybe your problem is similar. Try to search
for the old labels or try 'L', Enter to see all existing labels.
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [sup-talk] renaming label woes
2011-02-15 16:43 ` Philipp Überbacher
@ 2011-02-15 19:01 ` Philippe LeCavalier
2011-02-15 23:39 ` Philipp Überbacher
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Philippe LeCavalier @ 2011-02-15 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sup-talk
Excerpts from Philipp Überbacher's message of Tue Feb 15 11:43:13 -0500 2011:
> Excerpts from Philippe LeCavalier's message of 2011-02-15 16:26:48 +0100:
> > I changed my mind on a certain label I had setup and wanted to rename it. I first looked at using sup-tweak-labels but opted against that tool since I couldn't figure out how to limit add/remove to a specific set of query results. Instead I loaded sup, performed a search for that label, did !!, T, =, l and -FF ff (FF being the label in question). I refreshed the screen to see the changes(@) and the old label(FF) reappeared. I thought it might be some sort of case sensitivity thing so I then did: !!, T, =, l, -FF <enter> and =, l, ff <enter>. When I refreshed that time the change appeared to take. So I closed the buffer.
> >
> > Now when I search for 'ff' I only get a few threads whereas previously I had over 800. Interestingly enough, If I search by from: or subject...etc. of which I know I'll get a hit within that label the label 'ff' is there as expected. So why can't I search for 'ff' anymore? I'm guessing something with the indexing has gone a-scew. I remembered seeing "Optimizing index..." when looking to do this with sup-tweak-labels so I went ahead and did a dry-run but that didn't help the situation -maybe I shouldn't have done --dry-run? Or maybe I'm way off here ;-)
> >
> > ...help.
>
> My experience with sup-tweak-labels today suggests that each run it gets
> only part of the messages. Maybe your problem is similar. Try to search
> for the old labels or try 'L', Enter to see all existing labels.
>
As above, I did that and it only returns a few(11) threads. Doing 'L' and choosing FF or ff shows the same msgs, 11 of them. Still, searching for a thread for which I know should be labeled with that returns lots of threads, all properly labeled. Really odd. And broken.
--
Thanks,
Phil
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [sup-talk] renaming label woes
2011-02-15 19:01 ` Philippe LeCavalier
@ 2011-02-15 23:39 ` Philipp Überbacher
2011-02-16 13:39 ` Philippe LeCavalier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Philipp Überbacher @ 2011-02-15 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sup-talk
Excerpts from Philippe LeCavalier's message of 2011-02-15 20:01:38 +0100:
> Excerpts from Philipp Überbacher's message of Tue Feb 15 11:43:13 -0500 2011:
> > Excerpts from Philippe LeCavalier's message of 2011-02-15 16:26:48 +0100:
> > > I changed my mind on a certain label I had setup and wanted to rename it. I first looked at using sup-tweak-labels but opted against that tool since I couldn't figure out how to limit add/remove to a specific set of query results. Instead I loaded sup, performed a search for that label, did !!, T, =, l and -FF ff (FF being the label in question). I refreshed the screen to see the changes(@) and the old label(FF) reappeared. I thought it might be some sort of case sensitivity thing so I then did: !!, T, =, l, -FF <enter> and =, l, ff <enter>. When I refreshed that time the change appeared to take. So I closed the buffer.
> > >
> > > Now when I search for 'ff' I only get a few threads whereas previously I had over 800. Interestingly enough, If I search by from: or subject...etc. of which I know I'll get a hit within that label the label 'ff' is there as expected. So why can't I search for 'ff' anymore? I'm guessing something with the indexing has gone a-scew. I remembered seeing "Optimizing index..." when looking to do this with sup-tweak-labels so I went ahead and did a dry-run but that didn't help the situation -maybe I shouldn't have done --dry-run? Or maybe I'm way off here ;-)
> > >
> > > ...help.
> >
> > My experience with sup-tweak-labels today suggests that each run it gets
> > only part of the messages. Maybe your problem is similar. Try to search
> > for the old labels or try 'L', Enter to see all existing labels.
> >
> As above, I did that and it only returns a few(11) threads. Doing 'L' and choosing FF or ff shows the same msgs, 11 of them. Still, searching for a thread for which I know should be labeled with that returns lots of threads, all properly labeled. Really odd. And broken.
This sounds very broken indeed. Which sup version is this? I know as
little about ruby/sup as you do, but others might find the information
useful. Good luck.
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [sup-talk] renaming label woes
2011-02-15 23:39 ` Philipp Überbacher
@ 2011-02-16 13:39 ` Philippe LeCavalier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Philippe LeCavalier @ 2011-02-16 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sup-talk
Hi Philipp.
Excerpts from Philipp Überbacher's message of Tue Feb 15 18:39:11 -0500 2011:
> Excerpts from Philippe LeCavalier's message of 2011-02-15 20:01:38 +0100:
> > Excerpts from Philipp Überbacher's message of Tue Feb 15 11:43:13 -0500 2011:
> > > Excerpts from Philippe LeCavalier's message of 2011-02-15 16:26:48 +0100:
> > > > I changed my mind on a certain label I had setup and wanted to rename it. I first looked at using sup-tweak-labels but opted against that tool since I couldn't figure out how to limit add/remove to a specific set of query results. Instead I loaded sup, performed a search for that label, did !!, T, =, l and -FF ff (FF being the label in question). I refreshed the screen to see the changes(@) and the old label(FF) reappeared. I thought it might be some sort of case sensitivity thing so I then did: !!, T, =, l, -FF <enter> and =, l, ff <enter>. When I refreshed that time the change appeared to take. So I closed the buffer.
> > > >
> > > > Now when I search for 'ff' I only get a few threads whereas previously I had over 800. Interestingly enough, If I search by from: or subject...etc. of which I know I'll get a hit within that label the label 'ff' is there as expected. So why can't I search for 'ff' anymore? I'm guessing something with the indexing has gone a-scew. I remembered seeing "Optimizing index..." when looking to do this with sup-tweak-labels so I went ahead and did a dry-run but that didn't help the situation -maybe I shouldn't have done --dry-run? Or maybe I'm way off here ;-)
> > > >
> > > > ...help.
> > >
> > > My experience with sup-tweak-labels today suggests that each run it gets
> > > only part of the messages. Maybe your problem is similar. Try to search
> > > for the old labels or try 'L', Enter to see all existing labels.
> > >
> > As above, I did that and it only returns a few(11) threads. Doing 'L' and choosing FF or ff shows the same msgs, 11 of them. Still, searching for a thread for which I know should be labeled with that returns lots of threads, all properly labeled. Really odd. And broken.
>
> This sounds very broken indeed. Which sup version is this? I know as
> little about ruby/sup as you do, but others might find the information
> useful. Good luck.
>
Debian testing Squeeze/Wheezy w/Sup 0.12.1
--
Thanks,
Phil
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-16 14:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-15 15:26 [sup-talk] renaming label woes Philippe LeCavalier
2011-02-15 16:43 ` Philipp Überbacher
2011-02-15 19:01 ` Philippe LeCavalier
2011-02-15 23:39 ` Philipp Überbacher
2011-02-16 13:39 ` Philippe LeCavalier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox