From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.42.224.197 with SMTP id ip5cs11978icb; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 05:56:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.28.140 with SMTP id m12mr771959qac.107.1297864614459; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 05:56:54 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p13si417577qcu.189.2011.02.16.05.56.54; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 05:56:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58EC185837F; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:56:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from plecavalier.com (thelittlecloset.ca [64.40.149.83]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1051858361 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:33:52 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 15962 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2011 07:33:34 -0600 Received: from xplr-142-46-160-183.xplornet.com (HELO localhost) (142.46.160.183) by plecavalier.com with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 16 Feb 2011 07:33:33 -0600 From: Philippe LeCavalier To: Tero Tilus In-reply-to: <1297847031-sup-6835@tilus.net> References: <1297784079-sup-7440@plc.intranet.plecavalier.com> <1297847031-sup-6835@tilus.net> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:33:32 -0500 Message-Id: <1297863023-sup-4209@plc.intranet.plecavalier.com> User-Agent: Sup/0.12.1 Cc: Sup users Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Label Display; Sorting Alphabetically X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Hi Tero. Excerpts from Tero Tilus's message of Wed Feb 16 04:08:04 -0500 2011: > Philippe LeCavalier, 2011-02-15 17:37: > > Hi All. Just wondering if there has ever been any consideration to > > sorting labels alphabetically. I'm assuming the way sup displays the > > labels is purely esthetic's? > > I assume you are talking about thread index mode. No. Any mode really. Even in search mode they're random. >Judging from the code label order looks purely incidental. And I don't remember there > being any discussion on label sorting. Just putting it out there. When visialy scanning a large list it seems logical to me that one would want the labels in some order...Randomly displaying them looks messy and chaotic. Just my 2 cents. >Dump sorts the labels though, > to ease keeping dump in vcs I guess. I could see that being a must, yes. -- Thanks, Phil _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk