From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.42.224.197 with SMTP id ip5cs3946icb; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:17:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.79 with SMTP id hl15mr395197qcb.111.1297847855545; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:17:35 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h35si9132022qck.2.2011.02.16.01.17.35; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:17:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136F21858361; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 04:17:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from kuovi.tilus.net (kuovi.tilus.net [80.68.89.168]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78F11858356 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 04:08:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by kuovi.tilus.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BF8C110E46D; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:08:04 +0200 (EET) From: Tero Tilus To: Sup users In-reply-to: <1297784079-sup-7440@plc.intranet.plecavalier.com> References: <1297784079-sup-7440@plc.intranet.plecavalier.com> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:08:04 +0200 Message-Id: <1297847031-sup-6835@tilus.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Label Display; Sorting Alphabetically X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Philippe LeCavalier, 2011-02-15 17:37: > Hi All. Just wondering if there has ever been any consideration to > sorting labels alphabetically. I'm assuming the way sup displays the > labels is purely esthetic's? I assume you are talking about thread index mode. Judging from the code label order looks purely incidental. And I don't remember there being any discussion on label sorting. Dump sorts the labels though, to ease keeping dump in vcs I guess. -- Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/ _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk