From: "Philipp Überbacher" <hollunder@lavabit.com>
To: sup-talk <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>
Subject: Re: [sup-talk] renaming label woes
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:39:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297813032-sup-3201@eris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297796479-sup-5530@plc.intranet.plecavalier.com>
Excerpts from Philippe LeCavalier's message of 2011-02-15 20:01:38 +0100:
> Excerpts from Philipp Überbacher's message of Tue Feb 15 11:43:13 -0500 2011:
> > Excerpts from Philippe LeCavalier's message of 2011-02-15 16:26:48 +0100:
> > > I changed my mind on a certain label I had setup and wanted to rename it. I first looked at using sup-tweak-labels but opted against that tool since I couldn't figure out how to limit add/remove to a specific set of query results. Instead I loaded sup, performed a search for that label, did !!, T, =, l and -FF ff (FF being the label in question). I refreshed the screen to see the changes(@) and the old label(FF) reappeared. I thought it might be some sort of case sensitivity thing so I then did: !!, T, =, l, -FF <enter> and =, l, ff <enter>. When I refreshed that time the change appeared to take. So I closed the buffer.
> > >
> > > Now when I search for 'ff' I only get a few threads whereas previously I had over 800. Interestingly enough, If I search by from: or subject...etc. of which I know I'll get a hit within that label the label 'ff' is there as expected. So why can't I search for 'ff' anymore? I'm guessing something with the indexing has gone a-scew. I remembered seeing "Optimizing index..." when looking to do this with sup-tweak-labels so I went ahead and did a dry-run but that didn't help the situation -maybe I shouldn't have done --dry-run? Or maybe I'm way off here ;-)
> > >
> > > ...help.
> >
> > My experience with sup-tweak-labels today suggests that each run it gets
> > only part of the messages. Maybe your problem is similar. Try to search
> > for the old labels or try 'L', Enter to see all existing labels.
> >
> As above, I did that and it only returns a few(11) threads. Doing 'L' and choosing FF or ff shows the same msgs, 11 of them. Still, searching for a thread for which I know should be labeled with that returns lots of threads, all properly labeled. Really odd. And broken.
This sounds very broken indeed. Which sup version is this? I know as
little about ruby/sup as you do, but others might find the information
useful. Good luck.
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-15 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-15 15:26 Philippe LeCavalier
2011-02-15 16:43 ` Philipp Überbacher
2011-02-15 19:01 ` Philippe LeCavalier
2011-02-15 23:39 ` Philipp Überbacher [this message]
2011-02-16 13:39 ` Philippe LeCavalier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297813032-sup-3201@eris \
--to=hollunder@lavabit.com \
--cc=sup-talk@rubyforge.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox