From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.42.217.131 with SMTP id hm3cs95924icb; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 06:02:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.11.79 with SMTP id s15mr833641qas.2.1290693754903; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 06:02:34 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j26si1991176qck.6.2010.11.25.06.02.34; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 06:02:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5BF1858370; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:02:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from kuovi.tilus.net (kuovi.tilus.net [80.68.89.168]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CB31858300 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:50:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by kuovi.tilus.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0365D6017; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:50:22 +0200 (EET) From: Tero Tilus To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <4CEE4DBF.7030600@kpvn.de> References: <4CED5155.3080502@kpvn.de> <1290625650-sup-8253@tilus.net> <4CEE4DBF.7030600@kpvn.de> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:50:21 +0200 Message-Id: <1290692520-sup-6531@tilus.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] ncursesw encoding X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Moritz Neeb, 2010-11-25 13:51: > I installed sup as a debian package, not as gem. Could this be a > problem? I don't know. Though I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out to be. Rubygems and Dpkg provide essentially the same service (package and dependency management) and are (afaik) not aware of each other. As a result they do not play together at all. Usually there are no collisions but ymmv. On Debian derivatives my route of least gray hair has been to install Rubygems from sources using defaults and as much of the Ruby stuff from gems as possible. -- Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/ _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk