From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.42.190.3 with SMTP id dg3cs91177icb; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.200.18 with SMTP id x18mr6144215wff.373.1288091992172; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o21si6574194vcr.49.2010.10.26.04.19.51; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E46C19783BA; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:19:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from barfooze.de (barfooze.de [78.46.117.212]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9711858378 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:45:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from moritz by barfooze.de with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PAh1a-0001sy-RX for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:45:02 +0200 From: Moritz Wilhelmy To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1288087383-sup-6381@eris> References: <1288087383-sup-6381@eris> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:45:02 +0200 Message-Id: <1288089771-sup-406@niflheimr> User-Agent: Sup/0.11 Subject: Re: [sup-talk] sup and ruby 1.9 X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org > Excerpts from Hamish D's message of 2010-10-26 01:06:51 +0200: > > I'm wondering what the status of sup and ruby 1.9 is. Is it stable and > > no more buggy than on ruby 1.8? Is it significantly faster than on > > ruby 1.8? I myself have 1.8 installed in /opt and use it for running sup. My distro (arch) likes upgrading to beta-versions way too much, and I want my mailclient to be stable ;) _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk