From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: by 10.42.190.3 with SMTP id dg3cs89624icb;
        Tue, 26 Oct 2010 03:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.247.15 with SMTP id ma15mr7486059qcb.279.1288088047672;
        Tue, 26 Oct 2010 03:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org>
Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 12si15166328qcd.203.2010.10.26.03.14.06;
        Tue, 26 Oct 2010 03:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19;
DomainKey-Status: bad (test mode)
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org; domainkeys=hardfail (test mode) header.From=hollunder@lavabit.com
Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1])
	by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A209177995E;
	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:14:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from karen.lavabit.com (karen.lavabit.com [72.249.41.33])
	by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84AE51858363
	for <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:04:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from e.earth.lavabit.com (e.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.14])
	by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60BC11B8DD
	for <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 05:04:31 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (eris.mozart.uni-klu.ac.at [143.205.216.123])
	by lavabit.com with ESMTP id 2Y89ET3ZX4HU
	for <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 05:04:31 -0500
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com;
	b=K1wzkGB1mvlt1jM7WVBQ7RKet0X1zU10dew0cfdZszSCW0+pKlaCz6SRA81nkHy413hVETSu8wRpjK3fpoADayodRpSRm72ZlnLPyrvRoI5ZD3G8hMzsIFdPViOY8coG+2PIUMZ+d4+29VKuDqvFWL1BH0cs7jATGy9PLzrKdxM=;
	h=Content-Type:From:To:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date:Message-Id:User-Agent:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
From: =?utf-8?q?Philipp_=C3=9Cberbacher?= <hollunder@lavabit.com>
To: sup-talk <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>
In-reply-to: <AANLkTinRQ9A+8630CnUKam1h2X5o_N_n9e6GgY_weLkQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinRQ9A+8630CnUKam1h2X5o_N_n9e6GgY_weLkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:04:29 +0200
Message-Id: <1288087383-sup-6381@eris>
User-Agent: Sup/0.11
Subject: Re: [sup-talk] sup and ruby 1.9
X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup <sup-talk.rubyforge.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://rubyforge.org/mailman/options/sup-talk>,
	<mailto:sup-talk-request@rubyforge.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk>
List-Post: <mailto:sup-talk@rubyforge.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sup-talk-request@rubyforge.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk>,
	<mailto:sup-talk-request@rubyforge.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org
Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org

Excerpts from Hamish D's message of 2010-10-26 01:06:51 +0200:
> Hello all
> 
> I'm wondering what the status of sup and ruby 1.9 is. Is it stable and
> no more buggy than on ruby 1.8? Is it significantly faster than on
> ruby 1.8?
> 
> If I did go for the change, can I switch back and forth between ruby
> versions? Should I reinstall all the gems that sup depends on?
> 
> Thanks in advance
> Hamish

All I can tell you is that sup 0.11 works with ruby 1.9.1_p429 but
breaks with 1.9.2.

_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk