From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.42.190.3 with SMTP id dg3cs91266icb; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.49.8 with SMTP id w8mr6678321wfw.209.1288092204158; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e32si6582757vcs.35.2010.10.26.04.23.23; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED5219783C0; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:23:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from twice-irc.de (mx2.twice-irc.de [79.140.35.195]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F7F1678310 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:06:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from midna.zekjur.net (midna.zekjur.net [IPv6:2001:4d88:1008:4242:21c:c0ff:fe7e:4776]) by twice-irc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50F0216663A for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:06:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by midna.zekjur.net (Postfix, from userid 101) id 87CF430CE5B; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:06:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Stapelberg To: sup-talk In-reply-to: References: Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:06:25 +0200 Message-Id: <1288073067-sup-885@midna.zekjur.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] sup and ruby 1.9 X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Hi Hamish, Excerpts from Hamish D's message of 2010-10-26 01:06:51 +0200: > I'm wondering what the status of sup and ruby 1.9 is. Is it stable and > no more buggy than on ruby 1.8? Is it significantly faster than on > ruby 1.8? It works just fine. I run it since a few months without any problems. For ruby 1.9.2, you need some patches: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/2010-September/004223.html > If I did go for the change, can I switch back and forth between ruby > versions? Should I reinstall all the gems that sup depends on? Yes, you need to install all gems. Best regards, Michael _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk