From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.216.66.137 with SMTP id h9cs49317wed; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.186.210 with SMTP id ct18mr2852126qcb.225.1287792036462; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t25si7477514qco.59.2010.10.22.17.00.36; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BA71978478; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:00:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from barfooze.de (barfooze.de [78.46.117.212]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCC719782CD for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:32:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from moritz by barfooze.de with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P9R6M-00078b-4g for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:32:46 +0200 From: Moritz Wilhelmy To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1287770413-sup-279@blake> References: <1287739347-sup-2987@blake> <1287743891-sup-1864@etiriah> <1287748027-sup-7412@blake> <1287752579-sup-8292@niflheimr> <1287770413-sup-279@blake> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:32:46 +0200 Message-Id: <1287790246-sup-3757@niflheimr> User-Agent: Sup/0.11 Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Slow opening of threads? X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Excerpts from Shadowfirebird's message of Fri Oct 22 20:02:39 +0200 2010: > Oh gods. I'm emacs-phobic. I meant to say, you could try if notmuch performs any better. You don't have to use the emacs extension, it also works as plain command line command. If the performance is not better, it's probably your NFS. _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk