* [sup-talk] Reply-To: not offered as reply recipient
@ 2010-10-15 16:01 Andrew Pimlott
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Pimlott @ 2010-10-15 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sup-talk
Just a ping: there was this thread on what reply recipients to offer in
some mailing list cases:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sup-talk@rubyforge.org/msg02206.html
Replying to list admin messages is still pretty broken. They set
Reply-To to a magic address, but sup does not offer it as an option
because of the mailing list headers. Really annoying. Any further
thoughts on resolving this?
Andrew
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-10-15 16:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-15 16:01 [sup-talk] Reply-To: not offered as reply recipient Andrew Pimlott
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox