From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.204.155.88 with SMTP id r24cs270095bkw; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.61.86 with SMTP id s22mr2545443qch.204.1280949403807; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g26si5919651qcq.28.2010.08.04.12.16.43; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A4B167832C; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:16:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Greylist: delayed 306 seconds by postgrey-1.31 at rubyforge.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:16:29 EDT Received: from relay-5.dlfw.twtelecom.net (relay-5.dlfw.twtelecom.net [216.136.82.71]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A96E1858375 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:16:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay-5.dlfw.twtelecom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0CB1008B for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:16:29 -0600 (MDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twtelecom.net Received: from relay-5.dlfw.twtelecom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (relay-5.dlfw.twtelecom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5YroILpc2LNx for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:16:27 -0600 (MDT) Received: from mailblocker.ateb.com (unknown [97.65.140.200]) by relay-5.dlfw.twtelecom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2581110083 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:16:26 -0600 (MDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,316,1278302400"; d="scan'208";a="6736260" Received: from unknown (HELO sr002-2k3exc.ateb.com) ([172.16.48.228]) by mailblocker.ateb.com with SMTP; 04 Aug 2010 15:16:26 -0400 Received: from 172.16.48.3 ([172.16.48.3]) by sr002-2k3exc.ateb.com ([172.16.48.228]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 19:16:26 +0000 Received: from raker by sr002-2k3exc.ateb.com; 04 Aug 2010 15:16:26 -0400 From: Reid Thompson To: William Morgan In-Reply-To: <1280949075.17490.58.camel@raker.ateb.com> References: <1280540740-sup-9428@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1280945894-sup-1123@masanjin.net> <1280949075.17490.58.camel@raker.ateb.com> Organization: Ateb, Inc Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:16:25 -0400 Message-ID: <1280949385.17490.59.camel@raker.ateb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.31.90 Cc: sup-talk Subject: Re: [sup-talk] new mail library X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: reid.thompson@ateb.com List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 15:11 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 14:20 -0400, William Morgan wrote: > > Reformatted excerpts from Ben Walton's message of 2010-07-30: > > > I just found this (seemingly) awesome new mail handling library. I > > > know that rmail has lots of flaws and there has been previously > > > expressed sentiment that something better might be nice. > > > > If it's maintained in the least then it's probaby better than rmail, but > > if Sup started require activesupport I would jump off a bridge. > > not listed in the dependencies.txt > http://github.com/mikel/mail/blob/master/Dependencies.txt but it is listed in the gemspec s.add_dependency('activesupport', ">= 2.3.6") _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk