From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.204.155.88 with SMTP id r24cs269422bkw; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:02:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.73.1 with SMTP id v1mr8085990wfa.29.1280948523755; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z10si8430527vcl.146.2010.08.04.12.02.03; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127BF185839A; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:02:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Greylist: delayed 1900 seconds by postgrey-1.31 at rubyforge.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:52:23 EDT Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B271858346 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:52:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogia0-0003Bc-Bf for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:20:40 -0400 From: William Morgan To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1280540740-sup-9428@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1280540740-sup-9428@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:20:40 -0400 Message-Id: <1280945894-sup-1123@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] new mail library X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from Ben Walton's message of 2010-07-30: > I just found this (seemingly) awesome new mail handling library. I > know that rmail has lots of flaws and there has been previously > expressed sentiment that something better might be nice. If it's maintained in the least then it's probaby better than rmail, but if Sup started require activesupport I would jump off a bridge. -- William _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk