From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.204.134.218 with SMTP id k26cs134242bkt; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 08:17:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.60.7 with SMTP id n7mr12109754ibh.60.1275578229392; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 08:17:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g4si264342ibl.92.2010.06.03.08.17.08; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 08:17:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C38185836C; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 11:17:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pion.club.cc.cmu.edu (PION.CLUB.CC.CMU.EDU [128.237.157.88]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF36B1858346 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 11:16:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rlane by pion.club.cc.cmu.edu with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKC9o-0006H5-Qt; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:16:32 -0400 From: Rich Lane To: Andreas Happe In-reply-to: References: <1272606137-sup-842@acheron.quadco.net> <1272644331-sup-1274@zyrg.net> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:16:32 -0400 Message-Id: <1275577785-sup-679@zyrg.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Cc: sup-talk Subject: Re: [sup-talk] sup web interface X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Excerpts from Andreas Happe's message of 2010-06-03 09:11:31 -0400: > Rich Lane club.cc.cmu.edu> writes: > > This is a great idea. I recommend using the sup-server protocol, either > > natively or by running sup-cmd. That code has been in master for a while > > now. I don't have a real opinion on web frameworks, but I'm biased > > towards something lightweight. > > Wouldn't Rails[0] be the most obvious candidate? In addition since merb[1] was > merged (during the ongoing 3.0 development cycle) it might even count as > lightweight.. Sure. I really don't care what framework is used, I'll be happy just to see a working web UI. At the time I was thinking that if the web UI code were small enough it would be reasonable to keep it in the main Sup repo, but now I'm not even sure that's desirable. > I won't start it (as I don't have nearly enough time on my hand), but might > contribute -- just put a rough (but working) prototype on github. Link? _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk