Re: [sup-talk] sup web interface

From: Rich Lane <rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu>
To: Andreas Happe <andreashappe@snikt.net>
Cc: sup-talk <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>
Subject: Re: [sup-talk] sup web interface
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:16:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275577785-sup-679@zyrg.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20100603T150837-186@post.gmane.org>

Excerpts from Andreas Happe's message of 2010-06-03 09:11:31 -0400:
> Rich Lane <rlane <at> club.cc.cmu.edu> writes: 
> > This is a great idea. I recommend using the sup-server protocol, either
> > natively or by running sup-cmd. That code has been in master for a while
> > now. I don't have a real opinion on web frameworks, but I'm biased
> > towards something lightweight.
> 
> Wouldn't Rails[0] be the most obvious candidate? In addition since merb[1] was
> merged (during the ongoing 3.0 development cycle) it might even count as
> lightweight..

Sure. I really don't care what framework is used, I'll be happy just to
see a working web UI. At the time I was thinking that if the web UI code
were small enough it would be reasonable to keep it in the main Sup repo,
but now I'm not even sure that's desirable.

> I won't start it (as I don't have nearly enough time on my hand), but might
> contribute -- just put a rough (but working) prototype on github.

Link?
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk