From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.204.137.132 with SMTP id w4cs159218bkt; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:12:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.15.134 with SMTP id k6mr1197667bka.96.1271250742417; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:12:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w11si1525985bka.85.2010.04.14.06.12.22; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:12:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BEED3C8058; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:12:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CB5185831F for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:06:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O22IQ-0003Up-5Z for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:06:22 -0400 From: William Morgan To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1270850674-sup-4940@zyrg.net> References: <1270727373-sup-8902@roughage.com.au> <1270731588-sup-6397@roughage.com.au> <1270850674-sup-4940@zyrg.net> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:06:22 -0400 Message-Id: <1271250373-sup-8059@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] sent mail X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from Rich Lane's message of 2010-04-09: > I switched the dependency back to plain ncurses because ncursesw was > failing to compile on unusual platforms (because of its wide > characterness). I guess this calls for a ncurses-new gem based on the > same upstream code as ncursesw but without the wide character support. Welcome to hell. -- William _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk