From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: by 10.204.137.132 with SMTP id w4cs74564bkt;
        Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.33.131 with SMTP id h3mr4238871bkd.53.1271050702479;
        Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org>
Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u9si2447581bkz.97.2010.04.11.22.38.21;
        Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19;
DomainKey-Status: bad
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org; domainkeys=hardfail header.From=andrew@pimlott.net
Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1])
	by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D5B1D799CF;
	Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:38:20 -0400 (EDT)
X-Greylist: delayed 2154 seconds by postgrey-1.31 at rubyforge.org;
	Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:38:06 EDT
Received: from fugue.pimlott.net (pimlott.net [72.249.23.100])
	by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5368159802A
	for <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:38:06 -0400 (EDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=default; d=pimlott.net;
	h=Received:Content-Type:Cc:Subject:From:To:In-reply-to:References:Date:Message-Id:User-Agent:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=LdeKLpItdmcPXojzlhFfJldJEXkmwQMxAP24asWm9Gdz5qq5vXgTN8DAcbDLH2OVFDJoJtnmongv3n9UrljsX77lh7giIkN2NtOL4b1OeL96XoqJWgnPKxVWsIa7jce3KRnygogt3fHFIZDExWZHHrv4GWyNFLDOTCReCf7kI9Y=;
Received: from andrew by fugue.pimlott.net with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <andrew@pimlott.net>)
	id 1O1Bmh-0003Im-Ow; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:02:07 -0700
From: Andrew Pimlott <andrew@pimlott.net>
To: Rich Lane <rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu>
In-reply-to: <1271023429-sup-9851@zyrg.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004080235530.8539@snarfed.org>
	<1271023429-sup-9851@zyrg.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:02:07 -0700
Message-Id: <1271048365-sup-3959@pimlott.net>
User-Agent: Sup/git
Cc: sup-talk <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>, sjh <sjh@foolishpride.org>
Subject: Re: [sup-talk] current state of synching upstream?
X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup <sup-talk.rubyforge.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://rubyforge.org/mailman/options/sup-talk>,
	<mailto:sup-talk-request@rubyforge.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk>
List-Post: <mailto:sup-talk@rubyforge.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sup-talk-request@rubyforge.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk>,
	<mailto:sup-talk-request@rubyforge.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org
Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org

Excerpts from Rich Lane's message of Sun Apr 11 17:57:42 -0700 2010:
> Does anyone use the current sup-sync-back that only support mboxes? If
> there are no strong objections then the 0.12 sup-sync-back will only
> support maildir.

It wouldn't kill me to lose it, but I use it, and think on principle it
would be better to have an overlap period.

Andrew
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk