[sup-talk] GPG (outgoing)

From: Ian Smith <ismith@MIT.EDU>
To: sup-talk <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>
Subject: [sup-talk] GPG (outgoing)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 06:30:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1270981813-sup-1681@baad> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1171 bytes --]

Hi all,

I'm having some trouble getting outgoing signed and/or encrypted messages to be
accepted, and I'm hoping someone here has a suggestion.

In particular, I can sign (I've been testing mostly with signatures, not
encryption) using GPG, and send a message successfully; however, while sup
verifies that it thinks the signature is good, hushmail doesn't recognize the
message as having a signature (it sees signature.asc as an attachment, but
doesn't read the message as being signed), and correspondents tell me that
Enigmail flags my message as having a bad signature.

Previous traffic on sup-talk suggests a number of people are successfully using
gpg, so I'm a bit confused - a friend suggested that this might be because
implementation of the PGP/MIME standard varies widely between clients, so the
problem might be with hushmail and Enigmail rather than with sup or my
configuration thereof.  Can someone confirm this?  Would it help to do inline
signing and encryption rather than PGP/MIME, and if so, is there a patch in
progress to do that, or should I start diving through crypto.rb?

Thanks,

Ian

-- 
Ian Smith
ismith@mit.edu
http://www.bostonaccess.org

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 140 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk