From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.86.59.13 with SMTP id h13cs66715fga; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 18:10:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.113.153 with SMTP id a25mr1741170qaq.310.1267668650787; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:10:50 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7si18146982qwb.50.2010.03.03.18.10.50; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:10:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5CA18582DD; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:10:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB5418582DD for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:10:33 -0500 (EST) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so385637qwh.29 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:10:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:content-type:cc :subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:user-agent :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3EhhkcV3V+cOghP5c1rqIfoDPxNJ+69ljfwJvlPxXFU=; b=COwRoJU7VJLAonHya1NqxIXrGv8WKNdNf6cORbZBb5zWvg3P0Sx78n7QX1cjiPoObN jKBDb+LiByh7FAX5oECyjxzbTxfO4HyfTAfzAgszKCTwFHA6m7xCnCY3ueQUgBKPMD/o xzsb2pfmj+qIqrRarYit1N0HbNNu9ja/zlrsg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:content-type:cc:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding; b=OAk0PLPnXZzmCkEx+jjyGOEzpmJgDQZGxBLR4pDkW6cQCbatkA2w7zwTf6bGvqDiYm tJQMNPI3VCJaIMokS2/UPWeL4LLhuJOKxetUtm2c2ZQxX9vWtCNhbUUkJJ7JRwcKTVo1 7x2Sc99rPPZqaUSsWP4t0OREguu/Oynl/USLg= Received: by 10.224.110.2 with SMTP id l2mr314187qap.164.1267668633769; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:10:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (c-24-63-65-243.hsd1.vt.comcast.net [24.63.65.243]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 26sm230990qwa.8.2010.03.03.18.10.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:10:32 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Alexander To: Rich Lane In-reply-to: <1267654880-sup-4875@zyrg.net> References: <1267478622-sup-2939@tangerine.lanl.gov> <1267654880-sup-4875@zyrg.net> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:10:31 -0500 Message-Id: <1267668438-sup-218@r50p> User-Agent: Sup/0.10.2 Cc: sup-talk Subject: Re: [sup-talk] sup install error X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Excerpts from Rich Lane's message of Wed Mar 03 17:23:06 -0500 2010: > I'm thinking about changing the gem dependency from ncursesw back to > plain ncurses to avoid these install failures. Anyone have thoughts on > this? It could be that I'm misunderstanding something, but wouldn't it still be likely that there would be failures if the user hasn't installed the libncurses5-dev package, or whatever it's called on their OS? _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk