From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.213.28.69 with SMTP id l5cs247844ebc; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:35:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.224.2 with SMTP id w2mr898617ang.240.1264599350907; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:35:50 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 3si725051gxk.44.2010.01.27.05.35.50; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:35:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4193A3C8043; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:35:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1305B15B8028 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:32:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Na80p-0006Kh-QV for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:32:51 -0500 From: William Morgan To: Sup-talk mailing list In-reply-to: <4b6016a6.0d67f10a.74f7.ffffed83@mx.google.com> References: <1264522329-sup-4389@zion> <1264527747-sup-6577@masanjin.net> <4b6016a6.0d67f10a.74f7.ffffed83@mx.google.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:32:51 -0500 Message-Id: <1264599157-sup-2035@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Old Mail X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org [resend to list] Reformatted excerpts from Nicolas Pouillard's message of 2010-01-27: > It reminds me that I would really like an option to sup-tweak-labels > to accept a file in the dump format. > > It would allow us to feed a "diff" in dump format and so be able to > recover quickly incrementally upgrade a sup index. > > NOTE: using sup-sync is not an option, it is way too slow to look at > every messages of every sources. Not a bad idea. Maybe even as a separate sup-undump command. -- William _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk