From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.213.28.69 with SMTP id l5cs116888ebc; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:12:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.22.33 with SMTP id 33mr6215846agv.104.1264457530557; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:12:10 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 6si11052056gxk.11.2010.01.25.14.12.10; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:12:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3503C805E; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:12:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns2.limegroup.com (ns2.limegroup.com [64.20.166.97]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BDC18582DE for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:56:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns1.limegroup.com (ns1.limegroup.com [10.1.1.5]) by ns2.limegroup.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0PLuOrI018107 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:56:24 -0500 Received: from lithium-a.limegroup.com (lithium-a.limegroup.com [10.1.1.12]) by ns1.limegroup.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0PLuOtV019627 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:56:24 -0500 Received: from sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com (sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com [10.0.25.84]) by lithium-a.limegroup.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0PLuOfp020650 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:56:24 -0500 Received: from sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0PLuOJ7022070 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:56:24 -0500 Received: (from sgoldman@localhost) by sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0PLuOi4022068; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:56:24 -0500 From: Steve Goldman To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1264454942-sup-8589@masanjin.net> References: <1263757714-sup-394@sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com> <1263760574-sup-1333@masanjin.net> <1263763237-sup-3701@sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com> <1263764041-sup-9982@masanjin.net> <1263771478-sup-431@sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com> <1263772988-sup-2344@masanjin.net> <1263774467-sup-9664@sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com> <1263778916-sup-8839@sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com> <1263779746-sup-4232@zyrg.net> <1263843740-sup-4441@sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com> <1263851352-sup-6223@masanjin.net> <1263907792-sup-3649@sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com> <1263908176-sup-851@masanjin.net> <1264437234-sup-8884@sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com> <1264454942-sup-8589@masanjin.net> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:56:24 -0500 Message-Id: <1264456502-sup-2092@sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com> User-Agent: Sup/git MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.1.1.6 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.1.1.4 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.1.1.10 Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Problems running sup-convert-ferret-index X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Mon Jan 25 16:30:48 -0500 2010: > Reformatted excerpts from Steve Goldman's message of 2010-01-25: > > Tried running sup-config from scratch last night. No dice. sup-sync > > failed after about ten minutes. > > > > What info can I supply that would help debug this? > > Is it still a segfault? Presumably. I run it through sup-config, which outputs "Rats, that didn't work" when the return code is non-zero. But sup-sync outputs nothing. > If so, what does gem list --local say the version is of the "xapian" or > "xapian-full" gem? It's installed with our Fedora release, but my guy tells me this is the version info: xapian-bindings-ruby-1.0.17-2.fc11.x86_64 > > ruby version 1.8.6 > > How difficult would it be to try with 1.9.1, or at least 1.8.7? He says the Fedora release will likely get there soon, but we could try to get it in advance if you think this will help. Thanks. -- Steve Goldman sgoldman@tower-research.com T: 212.219.6014 F: 212.219.6007 Tower Research Capital, LLC 377 Broadway, 11th Fl. New York, NY 10013 _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk