From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.87.14 with SMTP id k14cs1414972agb; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 13:24:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.22.4 with SMTP id l4mr4661325fab.37.1262467453147; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:24:13 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 2si24055726fks.13.2010.01.02.13.24.12; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:24:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A8D1D78878; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:24:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A4C18582C1 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:24:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NRBS8-0002qi-Mp for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:24:04 -0800 From: William Morgan To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1262460996-sup-1383@home.mrtheplague.net> References: <1262460996-sup-1383@home.mrtheplague.net> Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:24:04 -0800 Message-Id: <1262467343-sup-9565@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Ferret to Xapian conversion X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from Anthony Martinez's message of 2010-01-02: > A quick glance over the recent patches doesn't suggest anything that would break > the procedure on the Wiki, and I assume that Rich Lane and others are running on > Xapian without excessive trouble, so the only difference from the Wiki is that > we can run sup without -o and rm -rf ~/.sup/ferret nowadays. I'm just about to start work on a coversion script, so if you want to wait a few hours, it should be easy to have an automated version of this. > Is that an accurate assessment? Yes. -- William _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk