From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.87.14 with SMTP id k14cs1200593agb; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:06:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.100.2 with SMTP id w2mr7938858qan.357.1262131590864; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:06:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 16si19767933qyk.117.2009.12.29.16.06.30; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:06:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921B81D78883; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:06:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD5B167830A for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:06:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NPm53-0000Zh-RI for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:06:25 -0800 From: William Morgan To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1262127725-sup-1052@zyrg.net> References: <1262035134-sup-4921@zyrg.net> <1262127243-sup-4569@masanjin.net> <1262127725-sup-1052@zyrg.net> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:06:25 -0800 Message-Id: <1262131461-sup-3945@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] xapian-full and ncursesw gems X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from Rich Lane's message of 2009-12-29: > Renaming the files seems like the most logical thing to do so I'll > push an update to the gem and send in a Sup patch to try ncursesw > first. Agreed. Sounds great. Thanks! -- William _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk