From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.87.14 with SMTP id k14cs1199994agb; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:56:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.44.2 with SMTP id y2mr7218642qce.76.1262130989521; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:56:29 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 27si19681619qyk.89.2009.12.29.15.56.29; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:56:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4735E167831C; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:56:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAAF16782B6 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:54:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NPltw-0000Na-5m for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:54:56 -0800 From: William Morgan To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1262130179-sup-8306@zyrg.net> References: <1262098048-sup-7303@tw> <1262127103-sup-307@masanjin.net> <1262128268-sup-2780@tw> <1262128724-sup-1138@tilus.net> <1262130179-sup-8306@zyrg.net> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:54:54 -0800 Message-Id: <1262130868-sup-2032@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] unread status X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from Rich Lane's message of 2009-12-29: > I should dust it off and resubmit. It will cause a UI-responsiveness > regression for ferret users, but if ferret is going to be deprecated > in the next release then I don't care too much. Please do. Encouraging Ferret users to switch is fine. :) -- William _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk