From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.87.14 with SMTP id k14cs1106334agb; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:51:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.31.206 with SMTP id z14mr3117290qcc.79.1262019094325; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:51:34 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 28si18391431qyk.98.2009.12.28.08.51.34; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:51:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18CE619782F8; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:51:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-yx0-f187.google.com (mail-yx0-f187.google.com [209.85.210.187]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9339A15B802E for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:51:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by yxe17 with SMTP id 17so9425939yxe.33 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:51:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:subject:from:to :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:user-agent :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xh+UJtTLkD0Oxk5JH4pt+2slZ3gj0HkbYf4zePuJLEE=; b=QDdO2iEwSjGLkRZEO2ATXNACsHnUNnN8/w1LxhM5eLCGCHqc+3jYccxNtbiZn7GrTD 2RoosUsBYpkm7c0APOTVPhxSrRgziTdvcq5gepneCixgDGKnZP9aQWVgl5BfHD1bAv1Q 1l4dpj9dTjQrQYKkw2bG4ubIZXVENBmPiLMgE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :user-agent:content-transfer-encoding; b=wWIlTcfKIEP8Zd1QsD8WWKzh7FWoWdNWv7bs10Z14Hm1VMvN7+NZcTRZwhLQvETQDT ZakXy+7W+ZZwSvw2XJrnrGKSupT7f5l8bUhGgSklYnfuDePORAPOmIkRn52syc1I7NFJ RSGgKw27GtBW+4OZcR97UhKjMm4B5hUdlBymM= Received: by 10.151.89.31 with SMTP id r31mr23199643ybl.99.1262018703973; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:45:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (c-76-98-110-216.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [76.98.110.216]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm4099404ywh.45.2009.12.28.08.45.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:45:03 -0800 (PST) From: Eric Sherman To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <4B386D1D.4000609@exys.org> References: <4B384745.7080207@exys.org> <1262013098-sup-6005@masanjin.net> <4B386D1D.4000609@exys.org> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:45:01 -0500 Message-Id: <1262018249-sup-4764@changeling.local> User-Agent: Sup/0.9.1 Subject: Re: [sup-talk] sup with 120K mail X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Excerpts from Arvid Picciani's message of Mon Dec 28 03:32:29 -0500 2009: > On 12/28/2009 04:12 PM, William Morgan wrote: > > Reformatted excerpts from Arvid Picciani's message of 2009-12-27: > >> are there any plans to support large amounts of mails? > >> It doesn't appear to me much changed during the last months. > >> Last time i tried it was unusable slow. > > > > Can you be more specific about what's slow? I used Sup with a 160k > > index for a long time without trouble. > > "everything" sums it up. it takes forever to start, to quit, to show > the index, to show a single message, etc.. I imagine [offlineimap][1] will make your life easier. sup is speedy on my index of 35000 emails in maildir, while it was relatively unusable with raw imap. [1]:http://software.complete.org/software/projects/show/offlineimap _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk