From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.87.14 with SMTP id k14cs1099794agb; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:12:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.87.197 with SMTP id x5mr7537144qal.272.1262013152704; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:12:32 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 42si11217202qyk.108.2009.12.28.07.12.32; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:12:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734C518582CB; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:12:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30404167830B for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:12:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NPHGW-0000uC-TI for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:12:12 -0800 From: William Morgan To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <4B384745.7080207@exys.org> References: <4B384745.7080207@exys.org> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:12:12 -0800 Message-Id: <1262013098-sup-6005@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] sup with 120K mail X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from Arvid Picciani's message of 2009-12-27: > are there any plans to support large amounts of mails? > It doesn't appear to me much changed during the last months. > Last time i tried it was unusable slow. Can you be more specific about what's slow? I used Sup with a 160k index for a long time without trouble. -- William _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk