From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.87.14 with SMTP id k14cs682012agb; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:13:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.40.200 with SMTP id l8mr3316488qce.104.1261419238049; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:13:58 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 4si9551085qyk.42.2009.12.21.10.13.57; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:13:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19EC1D78862; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:13:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B59167830A for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:13:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NMmlN-0007AC-S2 for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:13:45 -0800 From: William Morgan To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1261414540-sup-87@tangerine.lanl.gov> References: <1261249910-sup-9552@masanjin.net> <1261272023-sup-2671@cammunism.org> <1261414540-sup-87@tangerine.lanl.gov> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:13:45 -0800 Message-Id: <1261419192-sup-3957@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Sent mail in inbox view X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from John Bent's message of 2009-12-21: > +1. But I wish forwarded emails would be part of the thread instead of > a new one. Me too! > I often just reply and change the to: field in order to get this > behavior. If joining worked, that would also be fine. I thought joining worked in recent Sups. -- William _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk