From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.87.14 with SMTP id k14cs565870agb; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:10:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.36.103 with SMTP id s39mr3056335qad.74.1261249820793; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:10:20 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 16si3665665qyk.15.2009.12.19.11.10.20; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:10:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D826185831C; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:10:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8338718582CE for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:10:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NM4gz-000142-8w for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:10:17 -0800 From: William Morgan To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1260822912-sup-2952@zion> References: <1260809732-sup-4895@zion> <1260810592-sup-4853@nixos> <1260822912-sup-2952@zion> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:10:17 -0800 Message-Id: <1261249723-sup-5051@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Sorting X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from Michael McDermott's message of 2009-12-14: > At least at my current version, the messages were not in a > chronological order. There were messages from the last couple of days > interleaved for the first few pages. That's a bug, then. Messages should always be in chronological order. If this behavior persists with Sup 0.9.1, please submit a bug report to http://masanjin.net/sup-bugs/ > That said, I am sure that arbitrary sorting would be useful. Heck, > even Thunderbird and Outlook (much less powerful though they be) allow > messages to be sorted by fields other than date received. Sorting by other fields is not so useful when you have a good full-text search. I doubt I will spend energy working on this, though as always, patches are welcome. -- William _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk