From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.87.14 with SMTP id k14cs563601agb; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:12:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.79.225 with SMTP id q33mr2994053qak.332.1261246337635; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:12:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 30si7154420qyk.135.2009.12.19.10.12.17; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:12:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B654185828D; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:12:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF24F185828D for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:12:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NM3mm-00006V-Hy for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:12:12 -0800 From: William Morgan To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1261167840-sup-592@orion> References: <1261167840-sup-592@orion> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:12:12 -0800 Message-Id: <1261246208-sup-2909@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] AM/PM display X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from Jay Mendoza's message of 2009-12-18: > In inbox-mode, Sup seems to display all of my message as if they were > received in the PM hours. Is this a known defect, or just a > misconfiguration on my part? Weird. Are the times otherwise correct? -- William _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk