Re: [sup-talk] Choosing a bug tracker for Sup

From: Michael Stapelberg <michael+sup@stapelberg.de>
To: sup-talk <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>
Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Choosing a bug tracker for Sup
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:00:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1257328487-sup-8593@midna.zekjur.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1257327692-sup-7174@elly>

Hi,

Excerpts from Israel Herraiz's message of Mi Nov 04 10:44:02 +0100 2009:
> I have been using Trac since a couple of years now, and it is sensible
> to spam, ok, but you can always delete comments, tickets, or anything
I am referring to trac 0.11.5, which does not have a possibility to delete
comments or tickets without installing a third-party plugin (which is
hard to use because you have to use ticket IDs). If I am wrong, please tell me
where they hid the possibility, so I don’t need the plugin anymore.

> in general, and force people to register to post comments or tickets,
> to fight against spam.
I consider forcing people to register to post comments/tickets as the end of
bug reports for my project. I personally would only register at a bugtracker if
the bug was *really* important and there would be *no* other possibility to
contact the author of the software. However, I want to get every bugreport for
my software and thus lower the requirements for users to actually help me
improve my software by submitting bugreports.

Best regards,
Michael
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk