From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.79.9 with SMTP id c9cs32500agb; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:12:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.116.133 with SMTP id m5mr93903qaq.214.1257264745366; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:12:25 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 31si268898qyk.121.2009.11.03.08.12.25; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:12:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFED159807E; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:12:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from pion.club.cc.cmu.edu (PION.CLUB.CC.cmu.edu [128.237.157.88]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B12718582AC for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:12:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from rlane by pion.club.cc.cmu.edu with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N5LzP-00086b-QE; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:12:11 -0500 From: Rich Lane To: Nicolas Pouillard In-reply-to: <1257237468-sup-5663@peray> References: <1257118189-sup-7392@zyrg.net> <1257163403-sup-9032@masanjin.net> <1257196293-sup-6882@zyrg.net> <1257237468-sup-5663@peray> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:12:11 -0500 Message-Id: <1257263951-sup-6837@zyrg.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Cc: sup-talk Subject: Re: [sup-talk] updated xapian experimental branch X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Excerpts from Nicolas Pouillard's message of Tue Nov 03 03:39:48 -0500 2009: > What are non simple queries which would cause 'red X's to appear? My guess > is that since we cannot change other attributes than the labels, we can > statically know if the thread is still relevant without the label. No? is:inbox OR foo We have to use xapian to check relevance here because of the fulltext term 'foo'. _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk